Qiling Yiqi Tablets Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-responders With Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency (QLYQ-INR-pRCT)
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Qiling Yiqi Tablets Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency Syndrome
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Mei Han, phD
- 电话号码:+86 13401131731
- 邮箱:hanmeizoujin@163.com
学习地点
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100029
- Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
-
接触:
- Mei Han, phD
- 电话号码:+86 13401131731
- 邮箱:hanmeizoujin@163.com
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).
Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.
Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.
Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -
Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.
Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.
Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.
-
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART
Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
|
Qiling Yiqi Tablets: Qiling Yiqi Tablets are a marketed Chinese patent medicine (NMPA approval No. Z20050483; Sichuan Enwei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.).
The formula includes Astragalus, Codonopsis, Atractylodes macrocephala, Poria, and related components.
Dose: 6 tablets orally three times daily after meals with warm water for 48 weeks.Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
|
|
有源比较器:ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
|
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
大体时间:Week 48
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 48
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
大体时间:Week 48
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 48
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
大体时间:Week 96.
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 96.
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
大体时间:Week 96.
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 96.
|
|
CD4+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Treg proportion
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TRECs level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD3+ T-cell level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD31+ T-cell level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-2 level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-4 level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-6 level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-10 level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-17A level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TNF-alpha level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IFN-gamma level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
HIV RNA viral load
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Quality of life score
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TCM syndrome response rate
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
All-cause mortality rate
大体时间:From randomization through Week 96.
|
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
From randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Red blood cell count
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
White blood cell count
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Hemoglobin level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Platelet count
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute neutrophil count
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute lymphocyte count
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Aspartate aminotransferase level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Alanine aminotransferase level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Blood urea nitrogen level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in blood urea nitrogen level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Serum creatinine level
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary red blood cell result
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary protein result
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary white blood cell result
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary glucose result
大体时间:Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Incidence of adverse events
大体时间:Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Incidence of serious adverse events
大体时间:Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Treatment interruption rate
大体时间:Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
|
Concomitant medication use
大体时间:Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
|
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18.
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- CTCM-HIV-INR-QLYQ-2026
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.