Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Qiling Yiqi Tablets Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-responders With Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency (QLYQ-INR-pRCT)

7 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Mei Han, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Qiling Yiqi Tablets Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency Syndrome

This pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluates whether Qiling Yiqi Tablets combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) improves immune reconstitution in people with HIV who meet criteria for immune reconstitution failure and lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 60 years with HIV-1 infection, long-term viral suppression on ART, and persistently low CD4+ T-cell counts. A total of 240 participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART or ART alone. Treatment lasts 48 weeks, followed by 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcomes are absolute CD4+ T-cell count and immune reconstitution response rate. Secondary outcomes include immune homeostasis markers, T-cell activation and Treg proportion, thymic output and inflammation-related markers, HIV RNA viral load, quality of life, clinical symptom scores, all-cause mortality, and safety.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

This is a prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants will be recruited from three HIV treatment-designated hospitals in high-prevalence regions in China. Eligible participants will be randomized by center-stratified block randomization at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm or control arm. Randomization codes will be generated using SAS by personnel independent from the clinical trial. The ART regimen is not restricted and follows applicable domestic and international ART guidelines. Clinical data will be collected using a unified CRF/eCRF and managed through an EDC platform with de-identified study codes and access controls.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

240

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

  • China
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100029
        • Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).

Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.

Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.

Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -

Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.

Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.

Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.

-

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART
Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
Medicamento: Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART
Qiling Yiqi Tablets: Qiling Yiqi Tablets are a marketed Chinese patent medicine (NMPA approval No. Z20050483; Sichuan Enwei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.). The formula includes Astragalus, Codonopsis, Atractylodes macrocephala, Poria, and related components. Dose: 6 tablets orally three times daily after meals with warm water for 48 weeks.Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
Comparador Ativo: ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
Medicamento: Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Prazo: Week 48
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 48
Immune reconstitution response rate
Prazo: Week 48
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 48

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Prazo: Week 96.
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 96.
Immune reconstitution response rate
Prazo: Week 96.
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 96.
CD4+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Treg proportion
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TRECs level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD3+ T-cell level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD31+ T-cell level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-2 level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-4 level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-6 level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-10 level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-17A level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TNF-alpha level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IFN-gamma level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
HIV RNA viral load
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Quality of life score
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TCM syndrome response rate
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
All-cause mortality rate
Prazo: From randomization through Week 96.
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
From randomization through Week 96.
Red blood cell count
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
White blood cell count
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Hemoglobin level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Platelet count
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute neutrophil count
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute lymphocyte count
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Aspartate aminotransferase level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Alanine aminotransferase level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Blood urea nitrogen level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in blood urea nitrogen level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Serum creatinine level
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary red blood cell result
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary protein result
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary white blood cell result
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary glucose result
Prazo: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Incidence of adverse events
Prazo: Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events
Prazo: Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Treatment interruption rate
Prazo: Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Concomitant medication use
Prazo: Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Colaboradores

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

  • 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18.
  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识（2023版）[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南（2024版）[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de fevereiro de 2028

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de fevereiro de 2029

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

7 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

7 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

13 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

13 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

7 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • CTCM-HIV-INR-QLYQ-2026

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

The study involves HIV-related clinical data. The clinical data will be de-identified, stored in an EDC system, and exported only after written approval by the principal investigator.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever