此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effects of Sensory Integration Training on Static Standing Balance in Older Adults

2026年7月16日 更新者:Foundation University Islamabad

Balance impairment is a common problem among adults aged 60 years and older due to age-related decline in the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems. These impairments increase the risk of falls, reduce mobility, and compromise functional independence and quality of life. Conventional balance training is commonly used to improve postural stability; however, the additional benefits of sensory integration training remain unclear.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training on static standing balance in older adults with a moderate risk of falls. Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years and above will be recruited and randomly allocated into an experimental group (n=14) and a control group (n=14). Experimental group will receive sesnory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training three times per week for six weeks.

Balance performance will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). Data will be analyzed using paired-sample t-tests for within-group comparisons and independent-sample t-tests for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.

研究概览

详细说明

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Experimental groups will receive sensory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Both groups will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week. In addition, the experimental group will receive sensory integration training consisting of progressively challenging balance exercises performed under altered visual, vestibular, and somatosensory conditions.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics. Data normality will be assessed prior to inferential analysis. Paired-sample t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes within each group, while independent-sample t-tests will compare changes between groups. Statistical significance will be established at a p-value of less than 0.05.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

28

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Islamabad、巴基斯坦、44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 60.
  • Both Genders.
  • Able to understand and follow command.
  • Berg balance score lies between 21-40.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed vestibular and neurological conditions.
  • Orthopedic Conditions i.e., Recent fractures or surgeries, cervical spine issues or severe OA
  • Severe visual or auditory deficit

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Sensory Integration Training

Participants completed three supervised sessions per week following the same static balance progression: standing on both feet, feet side by side, tandem stance, and single-leg stance.

Week 1: Static balance exercises on a firm surface. Week 2: Session 1: standard training; Session 2: auditory deprivation; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues.

Week 3: Static balance on a sandy surface while wearing comfortable footwear with normal visual and auditory input.

Week 4: Session 1: standard training; Session 2: combined auditory and visual deprivation; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues.

Week 5: Session 1: standard training; Sessions 2-3: progressive shoulder-tap somatosensory perturbations with safety monitoring.

Week 6: Static balance on sand with comfortable footwear. Session 1: visual and auditory deprivation; Session 2: auditory deprivation with picture cues and shoulder taps; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues and shoulder taps

The experimental group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of sensory integration training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.
其他:Conventional Balance training

Conventional Balance Training (6 Weeks): Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included sitting, standing, weight-shifting, gait, and functional balance activities with progressive difficulty.

Week 1: Sitting with legs uncrossed, stepping forward/backward/sideways, and ball control while sitting then standing.

Week 2: Sitting with legs crossed, marching in place, and head rotations (up/down) during standing and walking.

Week 3: Normal standing, reaching tasks in sitting and standing, and trunk rotations during sitting, standing, and walking.

Week 4: Tandem stance, picking up objects from a table, stool, and floor, and walking forward, backward, and sideways.

Weeks 5-6: Single-leg stance, standing on foam, and dual-task training, including standing while holding a ball over a book and catching a ball, to improve postural control, coordination, and functional balance.

The control group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of conventional balance training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Balance
大体时间:6 weeks

The Berg balance scale serves to objectively evaluate a patient's capacity to maintain safe equilibrium throughout a sequence of standardized activities. It comprises 14 components, with each component featuring five levels of scoring ranging from 0 to 4.

Score range between 0-56. 0-20 means significant balance problems 21-40 moderate balance problem 41-56 independent with good balance

6 weeks
Balance
大体时间:6 weeks

The balance error scoring system was used. Score ranges:

  • 0-10 Excellent
  • 11-15 Good
  • 16-20 Average
  • 21-30 Below Average
  • >30 Significant Balance Impairments
6 weeks
Balance
大体时间:6 weeks

Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance was used

Score Ranges:

  • 120 Seconds (Normal Balance Performance)
  • 100-119 Seconds (Mild Balance Impairment)
  • 80-99 Seconds (Moderate Balance Impairment, Increased Risk of Instability and Falls)
  • < 80 Seconds (Significant Balance Impairment, High Risk of Falls)
6 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年1月10日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年4月20日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年6月10日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年1月19日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月16日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月21日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月21日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月16日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅