Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effects of Sensory Integration Training on Static Standing Balance in Older Adults

16. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Foundation University Islamabad

Balance impairment is a common problem among adults aged 60 years and older due to age-related decline in the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems. These impairments increase the risk of falls, reduce mobility, and compromise functional independence and quality of life. Conventional balance training is commonly used to improve postural stability; however, the additional benefits of sensory integration training remain unclear.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training on static standing balance in older adults with a moderate risk of falls. Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years and above will be recruited and randomly allocated into an experimental group (n=14) and a control group (n=14). Experimental group will receive sesnory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training three times per week for six weeks.

Balance performance will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). Data will be analyzed using paired-sample t-tests for within-group comparisons and independent-sample t-tests for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Experimental groups will receive sensory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Both groups will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week. In addition, the experimental group will receive sensory integration training consisting of progressively challenging balance exercises performed under altered visual, vestibular, and somatosensory conditions.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics. Data normality will be assessed prior to inferential analysis. Paired-sample t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes within each group, while independent-sample t-tests will compare changes between groups. Statistical significance will be established at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

28

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 60.
  • Both Genders.
  • Able to understand and follow command.
  • Berg balance score lies between 21-40.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed vestibular and neurological conditions.
  • Orthopedic Conditions i.e., Recent fractures or surgeries, cervical spine issues or severe OA
  • Severe visual or auditory deficit

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Sensory Integration Training

Participants completed three supervised sessions per week following the same static balance progression: standing on both feet, feet side by side, tandem stance, and single-leg stance.

Week 1: Static balance exercises on a firm surface. Week 2: Session 1: standard training; Session 2: auditory deprivation; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues.

Week 3: Static balance on a sandy surface while wearing comfortable footwear with normal visual and auditory input.

Week 4: Session 1: standard training; Session 2: combined auditory and visual deprivation; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues.

Week 5: Session 1: standard training; Sessions 2-3: progressive shoulder-tap somatosensory perturbations with safety monitoring.

Week 6: Static balance on sand with comfortable footwear. Session 1: visual and auditory deprivation; Session 2: auditory deprivation with picture cues and shoulder taps; Session 3: visual deprivation with verbal cues and shoulder taps

The experimental group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of sensory integration training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.
Sonstiges: Conventional Balance training

Conventional Balance Training (6 Weeks): Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included sitting, standing, weight-shifting, gait, and functional balance activities with progressive difficulty.

Week 1: Sitting with legs uncrossed, stepping forward/backward/sideways, and ball control while sitting then standing.

Week 2: Sitting with legs crossed, marching in place, and head rotations (up/down) during standing and walking.

Week 3: Normal standing, reaching tasks in sitting and standing, and trunk rotations during sitting, standing, and walking.

Week 4: Tandem stance, picking up objects from a table, stool, and floor, and walking forward, backward, and sideways.

Weeks 5-6: Single-leg stance, standing on foam, and dual-task training, including standing while holding a ball over a book and catching a ball, to improve postural control, coordination, and functional balance.

The control group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of conventional balance training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Balance
Zeitfenster: 6 weeks

The Berg balance scale serves to objectively evaluate a patient's capacity to maintain safe equilibrium throughout a sequence of standardized activities. It comprises 14 components, with each component featuring five levels of scoring ranging from 0 to 4.

Score range between 0-56. 0-20 means significant balance problems 21-40 moderate balance problem 41-56 independent with good balance

6 weeks
Balance
Zeitfenster: 6 weeks

The balance error scoring system was used. Score ranges:

  • 0-10 Excellent
  • 11-15 Good
  • 16-20 Average
  • 21-30 Below Average
  • >30 Significant Balance Impairments
6 weeks
Balance
Zeitfenster: 6 weeks

Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance was used

Score Ranges:

  • 120 Seconds (Normal Balance Performance)
  • 100-119 Seconds (Mild Balance Impairment)
  • 80-99 Seconds (Moderate Balance Impairment, Increased Risk of Instability and Falls)
  • < 80 Seconds (Significant Balance Impairment, High Risk of Falls)
6 weeks

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

10. Januar 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

20. April 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

10. Juni 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

19. Januar 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

16. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

16. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • FUI/CTR/2025/28

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Posturales Gleichgewicht

Klinische Studien zur sensory integration training with conventional balance training

3
Abonnieren