此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Role-play Video Demonstrations in Teaching Communication Skills

2026年7月21日 更新者:Ain Shams University

Effectiveness of Introducing Role-play Video Demonstrations in Teaching "Doctor-Team Communication" Online Course for 5th Year Students in Ain Eshams Medical School

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of role-play video demonstrations in teaching Doctor-Team Communication skills to fifth-year medical students at Ain Shams University. The study compares students who learn through online courses supplemented with role-play videos with students who received the traditional online course. Outcomes include student satisfaction and academic performance. The findings may help improve communication skills training in undergraduate medical education.

研究概览

详细说明

This educational intervention study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating role-play video demonstrations into an online Doctor-Team Communication course for fifth-year medical students at Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine. Effective communication and teamwork are essential competencies for healthcare professionals and contribute to patient safety and quality of care.

The intervention consists of a series of recorded role-play videos demonstrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication. These videos are integrated into the existing online course delivered through the university learning management system.

The study compares an intervention cohort exposed to the role-play videos with a comparison cohort that completed the traditional online course without the video demonstrations. Outcomes include student satisfaction with the course and academic performance as measured by course assessments and examination results.

The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the value of role-play video demonstrations in enhancing communication skills education in undergraduate medical training and may inform future curriculum development in health professions education.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

847

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Abbasya
      • Cairo、Abbasya、埃及、11511
        • Faculty of medicine ain shams university

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fifth-year medical students enrolled in the Doctor-Team Communication course.
  • Taking the course for the first time.
  • Willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria :

  • Students who had previously completed the Doctor-Team Communication course.
  • Students who declined participation.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Intervention group
Participants received the online Doctor-Team Communication course supplemented with recorded role-play video demonstrations illustrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, and interprofessional communication scenarios
A series of recorded role-play video demonstrations was integrated into the online Doctor-Team Communication course. The videos illustrated key communication and teamwork competencies in realistic healthcare scenarios, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication
无干预:Control group
Participants received the standard online Doctor-Team Communication course delivered through the learning management system without the additional role-play video demonstrations

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean Total Course Score (0-25 Marks) in the Doctor-Team Communication Course ( academic performance )
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks) at course completion
Student academic performance: Student marks were recorded as an objective indicator of students' achievement. Total course marks were 25 marks, including: 17 marks for end of course exam which was in the form of single best answer questions and the remaining 8 marks were allocated for continuous assessment, with students' progress tracked on their learning management system.
Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks) at course completion

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean Student Satisfaction Score on a Structured Course Evaluation survey ( student satisfaction )
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks)at course compltion

Student satisfaction will be assessed using a structured course evaluation surevy consisting of Likert-scale items evaluating instructor performance, course design, course structure, assessment and feedback, and overall satisfaction. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

The Survey was delivered online immediately after the end of the course. It was derived from a previous survey by Strachota (2006)7, titled The Use of Survey Research to Measure Student Satisfaction in Online Courses, presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The survey was designed using closed-ended questions on a 5-point Likert scale as well as one open-ended question.

Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks)at course compltion

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2022年2月22日

初级完成 (实际的)

2024年1月12日

研究完成 (实际的)

2024年4月22日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月15日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月21日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月23日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月23日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月21日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • MS126/2024

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

IPD 计划说明

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to confidentiality and privacy considerations. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form only

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅