Role-play Video Demonstrations in Teaching Communication Skills
Effectiveness of Introducing Role-play Video Demonstrations in Teaching "Doctor-Team Communication" Online Course for 5th Year Students in Ain Eshams Medical School
Przegląd badań
Status
Warunki
Interwencja / Leczenie
Szczegółowy opis
This educational intervention study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating role-play video demonstrations into an online Doctor-Team Communication course for fifth-year medical students at Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine. Effective communication and teamwork are essential competencies for healthcare professionals and contribute to patient safety and quality of care.
The intervention consists of a series of recorded role-play videos demonstrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication. These videos are integrated into the existing online course delivered through the university learning management system.
The study compares an intervention cohort exposed to the role-play videos with a comparison cohort that completed the traditional online course without the video demonstrations. Outcomes include student satisfaction with the course and academic performance as measured by course assessments and examination results.
The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the value of role-play video demonstrations in enhancing communication skills education in undergraduate medical training and may inform future curriculum development in health professions education.
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
Abbasya
-
Cairo, Abbasya, Egipt, 11511
- Faculty of medicine ain shams university
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
- Dziecko
- Dorosły
- Starszy dorosły
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fifth-year medical students enrolled in the Doctor-Team Communication course.
- Taking the course for the first time.
- Willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria :
- Students who had previously completed the Doctor-Team Communication course.
- Students who declined participation.
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Inny
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: Intervention group
Participants received the online Doctor-Team Communication course supplemented with recorded role-play video demonstrations illustrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, and interprofessional communication scenarios
|
A series of recorded role-play video demonstrations was integrated into the online Doctor-Team Communication course.
The videos illustrated key communication and teamwork competencies in realistic healthcare scenarios, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication
|
|
Brak interwencji: Control group
Participants received the standard online Doctor-Team Communication course delivered through the learning management system without the additional role-play video demonstrations
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Total Course Score (0-25 Marks) in the Doctor-Team Communication Course ( academic performance )
Ramy czasowe: Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks) at course completion
|
Student academic performance: Student marks were recorded as an objective indicator of students' achievement.
Total course marks were 25 marks, including: 17 marks for end of course exam which was in the form of single best answer questions and the remaining 8 marks were allocated for continuous assessment, with students' progress tracked on their learning management system.
|
Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks) at course completion
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Student Satisfaction Score on a Structured Course Evaluation survey ( student satisfaction )
Ramy czasowe: Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks)at course compltion
|
Student satisfaction will be assessed using a structured course evaluation surevy consisting of Likert-scale items evaluating instructor performance, course design, course structure, assessment and feedback, and overall satisfaction. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The Survey was delivered online immediately after the end of the course. It was derived from a previous survey by Strachota (2006)7, titled The Use of Survey Research to Measure Student Satisfaction in Online Courses, presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The survey was designed using closed-ended questions on a 5-point Likert scale as well as one open-ended question. |
Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks)at course compltion
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Sponsor
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)
Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- MS126/2024
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Opis planu IPD
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .