Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases (SMART)
2026年8月14日 更新者：Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman、Oman Ministry of Health
The SMART Trial: A Randomised Feasibility Study Comparing Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
This prospective randomised pilot feasibility study will compare single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy × 1) with multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for the palliation of painful bone metastases.
The study will evaluate pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy, together with feasibility, treatment compliance, toxicity, pain flare, retreatment, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study will generate preliminary data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised trial.
研究概览
地位
尚未招聘
详细说明
Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) is an established standard treatment for palliation of painful bone metastases. However, multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) continues to be widely used in clinical practice because of concerns regarding durability of pain control and retreatment. With the increasing use of modern arc-based radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), there is a need to evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy can provide effective pain palliation while reducing treatment burden and improving resource utilisation.
The SMART trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group pilot feasibility study comparing VMAT-based SFRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction) with VMAT-based MFRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) in patients with painful bone metastases, including spinal metastases.
Approximately 70 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SFRT or MFRT. Both treatment schedules will be delivered using VMAT with daily image-guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance.
Stratified block randomisation will be used according to the site of metastasis (spine versus non-spine) to maintain balance between the two treatment groups. Within each stratum, computer-generated variable block randomisation using block sizes of 4 and 6 will be used. Allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale at baseline and during follow-up. Participants will be assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after radiotherapy.
The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial at the participating tertiary oncology centre. Feasibility will include recruitment, treatment completion, follow-up completion and completeness of study data.
The primary efficacy outcome will be overall pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes will include pain response at other follow-up time points, retreatment rates, pain flare, treatment-related toxicity, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study is not powered to provide a definitive non-inferiority conclusion. A non-inferiority margin of 15% has been prespecified to guide estimation of the treatment effect and inform the design and sample size of a future definitive randomised trial. The primary efficacy analysis will compare overall pain response between the two treatment groups using the intention-to-treat population.
The study will generate preliminary feasibility and clinical outcome data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating single-fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
70
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB
- 电话号码：+96871926769
- 邮箱：balaji.radonc@gmail.com
学习地点
-
-
Muḩāfaz̧at Masqaţ
-
Muscat、Muḩāfaz̧at Masqaţ、阿曼、100
- Royal Hospital
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
不
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Histologically proven malignancy
- Radiological evidence of bone or spine metastases
- Pain score ≥4 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11)
- ECOG Performance Status 0-3
- Life expectancy ≥3 months.
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spinal cord compression requiring emergency therapy
- Previous radiotherapy to same site
- Unstable pathological fracture requiring surgery
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent
- Oligometastatic bone metastases requiring Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT)
Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 8 Gy delivered in a single fraction using CBCT based imaging guidance.
|
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 8 Gy in a single fraction with CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
|
|
有源比较器：Multifraction Radiotherapy (MFRT)
Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 20Gy delivered in Five fractions using daily CBCT based imaging guidance.
|
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 20 Gy in Five fractions of 4 Gy each with daily CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of target sample recruited
大体时间：From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
|
The percentage of the planned target sample successfully recruited during the recruitment period.
Recruitment feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
|
|
Percentage of participants completing assigned radiotherapy
大体时间：From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the assigned radiotherapy treatment according to the study protocol.
Treatment completion feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants completing 3-month follow-up
大体时间：From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the required study follow-up through 3 months after radiotherapy.
Follow-up feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants with complete required study data
大体时间：From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of participants with complete required study data according to the study data collection requirements.
Data completeness will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants with major protocol deviations
大体时间：From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of participants with major protocol deviations during the study.
A major protocol deviation is a significant departure from the study protocol that may affect participant safety, treatment allocation, assessment of the primary outcome, or validity of the study results.
Protocol adherence will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green <10% major protocol deviations (feasibility achieved), Amber 10-20% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red >20% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 4 weeks.
大体时间：4 weeks after radiotherapy
|
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use.
Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use.
The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
4 weeks after radiotherapy
|
|
Percentage of participants requiring retreatment
大体时间：From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
The percentage of participants requiring repeat radiotherapy to the treated sitefor persisten or recurrence of pain will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
|
Percentage of participants experiencing pain flare
大体时间：From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
Pain flare following radiotherapy will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Pain flare is defined as increase in NRS pain score by ≥2 points without reduction in analgesic use, or Increase in analgesic requirement by ≥25% without improvement in pain score, followed by return to the baseline pain level or analgesic requirement within 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 2 weeks and 3 months
大体时间：2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use.
Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use.
The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be recorded at 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
|
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline
大体时间：At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline will be assessed using the patient's analgesic consumption and expressed as oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED).
The change in analgesic requirement will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants receiving radiotherapy to new painful metastatic sites
大体时间：From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
The number of participants who receive radiotherapy to new painful metastatic sites during the 3-month follow-up period will be recorded descriptively.
This outcome reflects the occurrence of new painful metastatic disease during follow-up and is not intended to assess the efficacy of SFRT versus MFRT.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB、Royal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Oman
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M 3rd, Suh JH, Demas WF, Movsas B, Petersen IA, Konski AA, Cleeland CS, Janjan NA, DeSilvio M. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139.
- Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
- McDonald R, Chow E, Lam H, Rowbottom L, Soliman H. International patterns of practice in radiotherapy for bone metastases: A review of the literature. J Bone Oncol. 2014 Nov 7;3(3-4):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.10.003. eCollection 2014 Nov.
- Hird A, Chow E, Zhang L, Wong R, Wu J, Sinclair E, Danjoux C, Tsao M, Barnes E, Loblaw A. Determining the incidence of pain flare following palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: results from three canadian cancer centers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.044. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
- Westhoff PG, de Graeff A, Monninkhof EM, Pomp J, van Vulpen M, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, van der Linden YM; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group. Quality of Life in Relation to Pain Response to Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
- BalajiSubramanian S, Sathiya K, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Phanikiran S, Rela M. Re-irradiation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Dec 30;26(6):1060-1065. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0098. eCollection 2021.
- Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
- Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit J, de Haes H, Martijn H, Oei B, Vonk E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Wiggenraad RG, Hoogenhout J, Warlam-Rodenhuis C, van Tienhoven G, Wanders R, Pomp J, van Reijn M, van Mierlo I, Rutten E. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00110-3.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
2026年9月1日
初级完成 (估计的)
2027年12月1日
研究完成 (估计的)
2027年12月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年8月8日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年8月14日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年8月19日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年8月19日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年8月14日
最后验证
2026年8月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- MoH/CSR/26/32133
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
IPD 计划说明
Individual participant data will not be routinely shared with other researchers.
The study is a single-center feasibility study, and the collected data will be used for the approved study objectives and institutional research purposes.
Any data sharing, if required in the future, will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval, participant confidentiality, and applicable regulations.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.