Feasibility of the Implementation of the SPARKLe Nurse-led Integrated Transitional Care Model for Children With Complex Care Needs (SPARKLe)
研究概览
详细说明
Children with complex care needs (CCN) often require coordinated care across multiple healthcare providers and settings. Transitions from hospital to home represent particularly vulnerable periods and are frequently characterized by fragmented care, communication gaps, and unclear responsibilities. These challenges can result in unmet needs, duplication of services, increased burden on families, and preventable hospital readmissions.
To address these challenges, the SPARKLe project developed a nurse-led integrated transitional care model designed to improve coordination and continuity of care for children with complex care needs. The model was informed by contextual analysis and stakeholder engagement and is aligned with international frameworks on integrated care as well as national healthcare strategies in Switzerland.
This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing the SPARKLe model in a real-world hospital setting at the University Children's Hospital Zurich. The model includes key components such as early identification of eligible patients, structured needs assessment, active family engagement, standardized information transfer, and follow-up care coordination across settings.
A mixed-methods design was used to assess implementation outcomes, including feasibility, acceptability, adoption, and fidelity. Quantitative data were collected through medical chart reviews, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews with families, focus groups with healthcare professionals, and surveys among community care providers.
The study aims to generate insights into the implementation process, identify barriers and facilitators, and inform further refinement and potential scale-up of the SPARKLe model.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Zurich、瑞士、8008
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged 0 to 16 years with complex care needs
- Admitted to a general pediatric unit at the University Children's Hospital Zurich for more than 24 hours
- Families of eligible children willing to participate in study procedures
- Hospital healthcare professionals involved in the care of included children
- Community healthcare providers involved in post-discharge care of included children
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children receiving care within an already established specialized care program at the hospital (e.g., palliative care or oncology care programs) Families declining participation Hospital professionals not directly involved in the care of included children Community providers not involved in the child's post-discharge care
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:不适用
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:SPARKLe intervention
Participants receive the SPARKLe nurse-led integrated transitional care model designed to improve coordination and continuity of care for children with complex care needs during the transition from hospital to home.
|
The SPARKLe model is a nurse-led integrated transitional care intervention for children with complex care needs.
It includes key components such as early identification of eligible patients, structured needs assessment, active family engagement, standardized information transfer, and coordination of follow-up care across healthcare settings.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the SPARKLe care model among community providers
大体时间:Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Feasibility of the SPARKLe care model from the perspective of community providers was assessed using four survey items adapted from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), together with selected items informed by the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) instrument.
NoMAD-informed items assessed coherence, cognitive participation, and collective action related to implementation and integration of the SPARKLe care model into routine practice.
Survey items were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
|
Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative perceptions of feasibility of the SPARKLe care model
大体时间:During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Feasibility was explored among family caregivers and hospital health professionals through semi-structured individual interviews and interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions examined the practicality of implementing individual SPARKLe care model components, including identification of children with complex care needs, needs assessment and transition planning, family engagement, communication with community providers, and post-discharge follow-up.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to perceived feasibility.
|
During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
|
Acceptability of the SPARKLe care model among community providers
大体时间:Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge
|
Acceptability of the SPARKLe care model from the perspective of community providers was assessed using four survey items adapted from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
Survey items were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
|
Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge
|
|
Qualitative perceptions of acceptability of the SPARKLe care model
大体时间:During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Acceptability was explored among family caregivers and hospital health professionals through semi-structured individual interviews and interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions examined satisfaction with and perceptions of the usefulness, appropriateness, and overall experience of the SPARKLe care model.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to perceived acceptability.
|
During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
|
Early adoption of the SPARKLe care model assessed through healthcare professional focus group interviews
大体时间:During the 4-month implementation period
|
Early adoption was explored among hospital health professionals through semi-structured interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions adapted from the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) examined initial uptake, engagement with the intervention, willingness to use the SPARKLe care model, perceived value of the intervention, and intentions to continue SPARKLe-related care coordination activities in routine practice.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to early adoption.
|
During the 4-month implementation period
|
|
Proportion of SPARKLe intervention components implemented as intended
大体时间:From hospital admission through 48 hours after discharge
|
Implementation fidelity was assessed using a structured fidelity assessment evaluating whether individual SPARKLe intervention components were implemented as intended for each participating child with complex care needs.
The assessment covered the five core components of the SPARKLe care model: (1) identification of children with complex care needs, (2) needs assessment and individualized transition planning, (3) family engagement, (4) structured information transfer to community providers, and (5) post-discharge follow-up within 48 hours.
Implementation of each component was assessed and summarized descriptively as the number and proportion of participating cases in which the respective component was implemented as intended.
|
From hospital admission through 48 hours after discharge
|
|
Implementation barriers and facilitators identified through qualitative interviews and focus groups
大体时间:During hospitalization through approximately 3 weeks after discharge
|
Implementation barriers and facilitators related to the SPARKLe care model were explored qualitatively through semi-structured individual interviews with family caregivers and interprofessional focus group interviews with hospital health professionals.
Questions addressed experiences with individual SPARKLe intervention components, interdisciplinary collaboration, communication across care settings, family involvement, care coordination processes, and organizational factors influencing implementation.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis to identify barriers and facilitators relevant to implementation and intervention refinement.
|
During hospitalization through approximately 3 weeks after discharge
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Suzanne Dhaini, PhD, RN、University Children's Hospital, Zurich
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- SPARKLe_2024_Feasibility
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.