Feasibility of the Implementation of the SPARKLe Nurse-led Integrated Transitional Care Model for Children With Complex Care Needs (SPARKLe)
31 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Children with complex care needs often experience fragmented care during transitions from hospital to home, leading to unmet needs and increased burden on families.
The SPARKLe project aims to address this gap through a nurse-led integrated transitional care model.
This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing the SPARKLe model in a real-world hospital setting using a mixed-methods design, focusing on implementation outcomes including feasibility, acceptability, adoption, and fidelity.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Children with complex care needs (CCN) often require coordinated care across multiple healthcare providers and settings. Transitions from hospital to home represent particularly vulnerable periods and are frequently characterized by fragmented care, communication gaps, and unclear responsibilities. These challenges can result in unmet needs, duplication of services, increased burden on families, and preventable hospital readmissions.
To address these challenges, the SPARKLe project developed a nurse-led integrated transitional care model designed to improve coordination and continuity of care for children with complex care needs. The model was informed by contextual analysis and stakeholder engagement and is aligned with international frameworks on integrated care as well as national healthcare strategies in Switzerland.
This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing the SPARKLe model in a real-world hospital setting at the University Children's Hospital Zurich. The model includes key components such as early identification of eligible patients, structured needs assessment, active family engagement, standardized information transfer, and follow-up care coordination across settings.
A mixed-methods design was used to assess implementation outcomes, including feasibility, acceptability, adoption, and fidelity. Quantitative data were collected through medical chart reviews, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews with families, focus groups with healthcare professionals, and surveys among community care providers.
The study aims to generate insights into the implementation process, identify barriers and facilitators, and inform further refinement and potential scale-up of the SPARKLe model.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
6
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Zurich, Suiza, 8008
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged 0 to 16 years with complex care needs
- Admitted to a general pediatric unit at the University Children's Hospital Zurich for more than 24 hours
- Families of eligible children willing to participate in study procedures
- Hospital healthcare professionals involved in the care of included children
- Community healthcare providers involved in post-discharge care of included children
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children receiving care within an already established specialized care program at the hospital (e.g., palliative care or oncology care programs) Families declining participation Hospital professionals not directly involved in the care of included children Community providers not involved in the child's post-discharge care
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SPARKLe intervention
Participants receive the SPARKLe nurse-led integrated transitional care model designed to improve coordination and continuity of care for children with complex care needs during the transition from hospital to home.
|
The SPARKLe model is a nurse-led integrated transitional care intervention for children with complex care needs.
It includes key components such as early identification of eligible patients, structured needs assessment, active family engagement, standardized information transfer, and coordination of follow-up care across healthcare settings.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the SPARKLe care model among community providers
Periodo de tiempo: Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Feasibility of the SPARKLe care model from the perspective of community providers was assessed using four survey items adapted from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), together with selected items informed by the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) instrument.
NoMAD-informed items assessed coherence, cognitive participation, and collective action related to implementation and integration of the SPARKLe care model into routine practice.
Survey items were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
|
Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative perceptions of feasibility of the SPARKLe care model
Periodo de tiempo: During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Feasibility was explored among family caregivers and hospital health professionals through semi-structured individual interviews and interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions examined the practicality of implementing individual SPARKLe care model components, including identification of children with complex care needs, needs assessment and transition planning, family engagement, communication with community providers, and post-discharge follow-up.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to perceived feasibility.
|
During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
|
Acceptability of the SPARKLe care model among community providers
Periodo de tiempo: Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge
|
Acceptability of the SPARKLe care model from the perspective of community providers was assessed using four survey items adapted from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
Survey items were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
|
Approximately 2-3 weeks after hospital discharge
|
|
Qualitative perceptions of acceptability of the SPARKLe care model
Periodo de tiempo: During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
Acceptability was explored among family caregivers and hospital health professionals through semi-structured individual interviews and interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions examined satisfaction with and perceptions of the usefulness, appropriateness, and overall experience of the SPARKLe care model.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to perceived acceptability.
|
During the 4-month feasibility evaluation period, with family caregiver interviews conducted approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
|
|
Early adoption of the SPARKLe care model assessed through healthcare professional focus group interviews
Periodo de tiempo: During the 4-month implementation period
|
Early adoption was explored among hospital health professionals through semi-structured interprofessional focus group interviews.
Questions adapted from the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) examined initial uptake, engagement with the intervention, willingness to use the SPARKLe care model, perceived value of the intervention, and intentions to continue SPARKLe-related care coordination activities in routine practice.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and summarized as themes related to early adoption.
|
During the 4-month implementation period
|
|
Proportion of SPARKLe intervention components implemented as intended
Periodo de tiempo: From hospital admission through 48 hours after discharge
|
Implementation fidelity was assessed using a structured fidelity assessment evaluating whether individual SPARKLe intervention components were implemented as intended for each participating child with complex care needs.
The assessment covered the five core components of the SPARKLe care model: (1) identification of children with complex care needs, (2) needs assessment and individualized transition planning, (3) family engagement, (4) structured information transfer to community providers, and (5) post-discharge follow-up within 48 hours.
Implementation of each component was assessed and summarized descriptively as the number and proportion of participating cases in which the respective component was implemented as intended.
|
From hospital admission through 48 hours after discharge
|
|
Implementation barriers and facilitators identified through qualitative interviews and focus groups
Periodo de tiempo: During hospitalization through approximately 3 weeks after discharge
|
Implementation barriers and facilitators related to the SPARKLe care model were explored qualitatively through semi-structured individual interviews with family caregivers and interprofessional focus group interviews with hospital health professionals.
Questions addressed experiences with individual SPARKLe intervention components, interdisciplinary collaboration, communication across care settings, family involvement, care coordination processes, and organizational factors influencing implementation.
Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis to identify barriers and facilitators relevant to implementation and intervention refinement.
|
During hospitalization through approximately 3 weeks after discharge
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Suzanne Dhaini, PhD, RN, University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de abril de 2024
Finalización primaria (Actual)
31 de julio de 2024
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
31 de diciembre de 2024
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
16 de abril de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
31 de agosto de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
3 de septiembre de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
3 de septiembre de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
31 de agosto de 2026
Última verificación
1 de abril de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- SPARKLe_2024_Feasibility
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .