Polygenic Embryo Selection
Prospective Observational Outcome Comparison of Morphology- Versus Polygenic-Based Selection of In Vitro Fertilization-Derived Embryos
This study will evaluate whether IVF success rates after PRS-based embryo selection differ from those after morphology-based embryo selection, and whether polygenic disease risk correlates with embryo morphology.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Conventional IVF involves the use of morphological grading, commonly using Gardner scores, to prioritize embryos for transfer. Morphological grading is a well established method to improve implantation rates, with better morphological scored embryos having a higher success than lower scoring embryos. Morphology-based selection is also employed following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), which is now used in over 60% of all IVF cycles in the United States.
More recently, polygenic scoring (PRS) of embryos has been introduced to provide additional information on disease risks and trait probabilities, allowing patients to utilize an alternative method of embryo selection. While there is no prospective study evaluating the utility of PRS, longitudinal studies on over 20,000 sibling pairs and on millions of adults have demonstrated significant disease risk reduction.
One common concern over the use of PRS in place of morphology based selection is the potential impact of implantation and delivery rates. For example, in some cases, the embryo with the lowest risk of a disease may not be the best morphology in the cohort of embryos available for transfer. The question of whether genetic based selection results in lower success rates than morphology based selection has not been evaluated in a prospective observational study. Some retrospective data exist in the context of sex selection. For example, patients using PGT-A may decide to transfer an embryo with their preferred sex (male or female) instead of choosing based on morphology alone. One such study indicated no significant difference in delivery rates between sex and morphology based selection. While this outcome remains surprising to many, one factor that is not always considered is that genetic selection does not always lead to transferring an embryo with the worst morphology. However, similar studies have not been published to corroborate these findings.
This study will evaluate whether IVF success rates after PRS based embryo selection are different from morphology based embryo selection and whether polygenic disease risk is correlated with embryo morphology.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
Cases (PRS): IVF patients/couples (intended parents) who elect to use PRS based embryo selection.
Controls (Morphology): IVF patients/couples (intended parents) who elect to use morphology based embryo selection.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Undergoing IVF and PGT at any clinic where Nucleus testing is used.
- Ability to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who decline research use of data
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 观测模型:CASE_CONTROL
- 时间观点:PROSPECTIVE
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
IVF patients using preimplantation genetic testing
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sustained Implantation Rate
大体时间:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8-12 weeks
|
Ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer at the time of discharge from IVF care |
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8-12 weeks
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Polygenic Score correlation with Embryo Morphology
大体时间:Through study completion (3 years)
|
Comparison of Disease Risk Scores According to Embryo Morphological Grades |
Through study completion (3 years)
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- Pro04078746
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.