此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability & Clinical Applications Consortium (CNTRACS): Study 1 (CNTRACS)

2026年9月28日 更新者：Deanna Barch、Washington University School of Medicine

Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability & Clinical Applications Consortium

In Study 1, investigators will test the ability of each of the seven paradigms to differentiate between schizophrenia (SZ)/schizoaffective disorder (SZA) and matched healthy control subjects (HC) and to predict individual differences in clinical measures of hallucinations and delusions (as well as measures of function). Investigators will also directly compare the tasks in terms of predictive ability and psychometric properties and determine whether the tasks share variance or explain unique variance. This will include determining whether hallucinations and delusions are best explained by separate underlying processes or by a single process. Investigators will also test whether the model-based parameters from these studies are more precise and sensitive than standard behavioral methods for assessing deficits across psychotic disorders and for predicting hallucinations and delusions (Aim 1). Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) [HC, N=125]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder [SZ/SZA, N=200]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a ~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups. Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) [HC, N=125]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder [SZ/SZA, N=200]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a ~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups.

研究概览

地位

招聘中

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Each participant will complete 4 sessions (~3 hours each) within 3 weeks, as in our prior studies. The first session includes clinical, self-report, proxy function, and community function assessments. Sessions 2-4 are for task and electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements. Each participant will complete 7 tasks across these sessions, while EEG is recorded. Task order will be counterbalanced across sessions. Clinical Assessment and Self-Report: A trained assessor will diagnose participants using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-5) for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Text Revision 59 (TR59). Clinicians will rate hallucination and delusion symptom severity with the Chicago Hallucinations Assessment Tool (CHAT) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Investigators will use the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) to evaluate the degree of preoccupation, conviction, distress, and life disruption associated with hallucinations and delusions elicited on the BPRS and CHAT. To address specificity, investigators will administer the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS). For self-report, investigators will use the Beliefs about Voices Scale, which assesses attributions about the origin and power of voices, and the Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) scale, which evaluates the extent to which people feel they can exert control over their voices. Investigators also will use the Peters Delusion Inventory to assess the extent of delusional thinking, supplemented by the Green Paranoia Scale to provide additional coverage of persecutory beliefs. To assess specificity, investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess depression, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) to assess anxiety, and the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) to assess anhedonia and motivation. Investigators will conduct a principal components analysis (PCA) on measures of the same construct (e.g., delusions) and perform primary analyses using the first principal component, followed by secondary analyses of specific measures False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction. Community Function: Patients will complete the Specific Levels of Functioning (SLOF) scale, a validated scale of work and community function. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Common Data Elements: Investigators will acquire the additional NIMH Tier 1 Common Data elements (e.g., World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0) & DSM-5 Symptom Measure). General Cognitive Ability. Investigators will include standard general cognitive measures to assess the specificity of effects beyond general cognitive impairment. Specifically, investigators will include validated online measures from TestMyBrain (https://www.testmybrain.org/using-tmb/research.html; Digit Symbol Coding, Vocabulary, and Matrix Reasoning), as in our prior work in both clinical and healthy populations. Electroencephalogram (EEG) Procedures: During the above tasks, 64-channel EEG will be recorded from Direct Current (DC)-130 Hertz (Hz) using a 500 Hz sampling rate. Offline data preprocessing will be conducted using Matlab toolboxes EEGLAB and ERPLAB, including segmenting, baseline correction, Independent Component Analysis (ICA)-based artifact correction, artifact rejection, and filtering.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

325

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名：Deanna Barch, Ph.D.
  • 电话号码：314-935-8729
  • 邮箱：dbarch@wustl.edu

研究联系人备份

  • 姓名：Clinical Coordinator
  • 电话号码：314-747-2160
  • 邮箱：ingram@wustl.edu

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • Irvine、California、美国、92868
        • 招聘中
        • University of California, Irvine
        • 接触：
    • Illinois
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21201
        • 招聘中
        • University of Maryland, Baltimore
        • 接触：
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis、Minnesota、美国、55455
        • 招聘中
        • University of Minnesota
        • 接触：
          • Angus Macdonald III, Ph.D.
          • 电话号码：612-624-3813
          • 邮箱：angus@umn.edu
        • 接触：
    • Missouri
      • St Louis、Missouri、美国、63108
        • 招聘中
        • Washington University
        • 接触：
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 59年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion

  1. age 18 to 59
  2. no substance disorder in past six months (confirmed with urine drug screens and breathalyzers);
  3. no clinically significant head injury or neurological disease. 4. Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) score =16+.

Group Specific Criteria: Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Disorder (SZ):

  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective;
  2. no medication changes in prior month or anticipated in the next month or not taking medications
  3. outpatient or partial hospital if unmedicated

Healthy Controls (HC):

  1. no Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder;
  2. no family history of psychosis or bipolar

Exclusion Criteria:

Healthy Controls (HC):

  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder diagnosis
  2. Family history of psychosis or bipolar

Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Disorder (SZ/SZA): additional exclusion criteria for the unmedicated individuals are:

  1. not in acute exacerbation requiring immediate hospitalization or treatment
  2. self-reported medication non-compliance for at least the four previous weeks 3)never having started medications

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：基础科学
  • 分配：不适用
  • 介入模型：单组作业
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Motion Perception Task Performance
大体时间：1 hour

With 15 degrees of initial or changed direction vs. the probability of failing to update.
1 hour
Sine Wave Speech Task Performance
大体时间：1 hour

Percentage of trials coded as speech or not vs Dprime
1 hour
Volatility Task Performance
大体时间：1 hour

Percent correct bag captures during periods of stability vs. instability - patients worse in both, but particularly impaired in instability vs. Environmental volatility belief parameter
1 hour
Choice Probabilistic Reversal Performance Task
大体时间：1 hour

in-switch rate - higher in patients, particularly paranoid patients vs. prior on volatility belief updating in response to volatility
1 hour
Kamin Blocking Task Performance
大体时间：1 hour

number of times they predict allergy following blocked cue vs. prediction errors and learning rates
1 hour
Minnesota Trust Game Performance
大体时间：1 hour

Percent of trusting choices depending on decision-agent and temptation vs. spite-guilt beliefs estimate
1 hour
Dynamic Trust Game Performance
大体时间：1 hour

Trust indexed by mean investment versus learning rates
1 hour

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Washington University School of Medicine

合作者

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of Chicago
University of Minnesota
University of California, Irvine
University of Maryland, Baltimore County

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Deanna Barch, Ph.D.、Washington University School of Medicine

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年10月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2031年6月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2031年6月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年9月11日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月28日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年10月2日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年10月2日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月28日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 201904012: Study 1
  • 2R01MH084840 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

Our plan is to share de-identified participant data through the National Data Archive (NDA) as required by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅