此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Line Dancing With Blood Flow Restriction for Balance and Gait of Older Women (In-Person vs Online)

2026年9月30日 更新者:Concordia University, Montreal

Fall Risk and Fatiguability Following Community Line Dancing Classes for Older Women

Falls are a leading cause of injury-related hospitalization among older women. Age-related declines in gait speed and postural stability are known risk-factors for falls. While exercise is well-known to help maintain or improve these losses, only 24.4% of older Canadian women are considered physically active.

Dance can act as a fun and social way to engage older women in exercise. Line dancing in particular has been shown to improve gait speed, knee extensor strength and endurance; however high doses are needed to achieve gains. Clifford and colleagues found that program lengths of 24 hours are needed to effect change, while Merome and colleagues recommend 3 hours per week. These high training doses may not be feasible for participants or community centres who offer programming. The time to commute to classes, find parking and caregiver roles at home are all cited as barriers to physical activity. We also propose that BFR could be a novel addition to increase the physiologic strain of online dance classes, which we hypothesize have a lower intensity and thereby lead to less fitness adaptations. Online classes are of interest as they can serve to reduce barriers to physical activity often experienced by older adults in Canada.

  • We propose online dance classes have reduced efficacy in stimulating adaptations to gait speed, strength and endurance when compared to in-person classes.
  • We propose blood flow restriction (BFR) as a novel addition to dance classes in order to aid in reaching physiological overload in more efficient time-frame.

BFR works by partially reducing blood flowing in and out of working muscles, thereby reducing oxygen availability, promoting anaerobic energy pathways and keeping metabolites in the muscles for a longer time period. Numerous studies have confirmed that when combined with low-intensity exercise BFR is capable of producing similar strength gains as high-intensity exercise. Additionally, BFR is safe and has been widely used among older adults and individuals with various medical conditions, including cardiovascular conditions.

While the benefits of BFR for muscle strength and hypertrophy have been greatly studied, there is limited research on its effects on gait and postural stability. Additionally, there is minimal research on potential combinations of BFR with dance-based activity.

  • This study will examine the differences between online and in-person delivery of 90 minute line dance classes on the postural stability and gait of older females over 10-weeks.
  • This study will then investigate the effects of combining BFR with 10-weeks of 90 minute line dancing classes for the postural stability and gait of older females.

Finally, muscle oxygenation and kinematic analysis will be conducted to help provide insight into any potential changes in gait and postural stability.

The intervention will consist of 10-weeks of line dancing classes, during which half the groups will be randomized to wear elasticized BFR bands pulled tight to a 7/10 of perceived pressure. Classes will be once per week for 90 minutes and will include a warm-up, 4 pre-set choreographies and a cool down. Breaks will be provided throughout the class.

Assessments will occur at pre, mid and post.

Gait will be assessed during a 6-minute walk test. During the test, participants will be filmed from a sagittal view to obtain kinematics. They will also be asked to wear a heart-rate monitor and muscle oxygenation sensors on their lower limbs.

Postural stability will be assessed via 30-seconds of quiet standing on force plates in conditions of eyes open, eyes closed and foam. Participants will also be asked to wear an accelerometer on their upper back during the assessment to obtain correlation to force plate data.

Functional strength will be assessed using 30-second sit to stand (with a secondary timer to obtain 5 time sit to stand length) and the Calf-Raise Senior test. Dynamic balance and mobility will be evaluated using the Functional Reach Test, and the Timed Up and Go in both single and dual-tasks. Aerobic capacity will be measured using a 3 minute Step Test while the participant wears a heart-rate monitor and muscle oxygenation sensors.

Finally scales of fears of falling, social connectedness, and overall mental health will be collected.

It is expected that this study will have great practical implications as the accessibility of this program can provide opportunities to older adults from various remote locations to increase their levels of physical activity in a safe manner. The affordability may also aid in adoption by community health and recreation centers as an easy-to-implement program that helps to improve the postural stability and gait of older women, thereby promoting independence and quality of life.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

60

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

    • Quebec
      • Montreal、Quebec、加拿大、H3G 1M8
        • 招聘中
        • Concordia University
        • 接触:
        • 首席研究员:
          • Emma H Chen
        • 副研究员:
          • Rudy Grief

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

60年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

女性

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Healthy older adults (60+ years old)
  • Comprehension of spoken English
  • Able to visit Concordia University for all testing sessions
  • No contraindication for physical activity from their physician
  • For online arm: Access to a device with a webcam, Zoom and stable internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Occurrence/onset of a stroke, vertigo, concussion or lower-extremity injury during the 10-week intervention period
  • Presence of venous thromboembolism, peripheral vascular disease or sickle cell anemia
  • Vacations during the study period

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:阶乘赋值
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Online dance classes without BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes on Zoom. Classes are structured with a 10 minute warm-up that reviews basic line-dancing steps, 4 dances of choreography (32 counts that repeat throughout the whole song, no tags, primarily facing forward), followed by cool-down stretches.

有源比较器:In-person dance classes without BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes at a local community centre. Classes will follow the same structure as the online program.

实验性的:Online dancing with BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes on Zoom. Classes are structured with a 10 minute warm-up that reviews basic line-dancing steps, 4 dances of choreography (32 counts that repeat throughout the whole song, no tags, primarily facing forward), followed by cool-down stretches.

Participants in the BFR group will be asked to wear 5 centimetre elasticized BFR bands on their proximal thighs at a 7/10 of perceived tightness during the dance classes.

实验性的:In-person dancing with BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes at a local community centre. Classes will follow the same structure as the online program.

Participants in the BFR group will be asked to wear 5 centimetre elasticized BFR bands on their proximal thighs at a 7/10 of perceived tightness during the dance classes.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Gait Speed
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in gait speed during a 6 Minute Walk Test reported as m/s.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Postural Stability
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Change postural stability during 30 second trials of quiet standing (conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, foam). Forceplate data will be processed according to recommendations by Quijoux and colleagues (2021) postural sway will be reported in cm.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Functional Strength - Sit to Stand
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in repetitions on 30 second Sit-to-Stand.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Functional Strength - Calf Strength
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes repetitions on the Calf Raise Senior Test.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Aerobic Capacity - Muscle Oxygenation
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's muscle oxygenation monitors during a 3 minute aerobic step test and 1 minute recovery period. The monitors will be worn on the participants gastrocnemius muscles and their vastus lateralis. Reported as %SmO2.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Muscle Oxygenation
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's muscle oxygenation monitors during the 6 Minute Walk Test. The monitors will be worn on the participants gastrocnemius muscles and their vastus lateralis to gait insight into oxygen delivery and consumption during walking. Reported as %SmO2.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Aerobic Capacity - Heart Rate
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's heart rate during a 3 minute aerobic step test and 1 minute recovery period. Participants will also be wearing muscle oxygenation monitors on their gastrocnemius muscles and on their vastus lateralis.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Heart Rate
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's heart rate during the 6 Minute Walk Test. The monitors will be worn around the participant's chest while walking.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Kinematics
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in participant's step length and cadence during the 6 Minute Walk Test will be reported. The parameters will come from a camera placed sagittally during the 6 Minute-Walk Test.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Mobility
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Timed Up and Go test in 3 conditions (single task, cognitive dual-task counting backwards by 3s, mobility dual-task holding water). The time to do each will be reported.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Dynamic Balance
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete a standing Functional Reach Test and the distance in cm will be recorded.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Number of Falls
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to report any falls during the intervention period. The number of falls experienced will be reported.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Fear of Falls
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Falls Efficacy Scale-International scale. Min score = 16, max score = 64. A higher score of 64 indicates a severe concern about falling.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Balance Confidence
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Min score = 0, Max score = 100. 100 indicates complete confidence in the ability to maintain balance.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Social Participation
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Self-efficacy for Social Participation scale (12-item). A total score of 0 indicates not confident at all, while a maximum score of 36 indicates complete confidence.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Social Support
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Duke Social Support Index (11-item). Minimum score of 11 indicates low connectedness while a maximum of 33 indicates greater perceived social support.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Depression
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Geriatric Depression Scale: Short Form. Min score = 0, max score = 15. A higher score indicates greater likelihood of depression.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Anxiety
大体时间:Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. Min score = 0, Max score = 20. I higher score indicates greater feelings of worry or anxiety.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年9月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年6月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月30日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年10月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年10月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月30日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 30020985

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅