Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Line Dancing With Blood Flow Restriction for Balance and Gait of Older Women (In-Person vs Online)

30. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Concordia University, Montreal

Fall Risk and Fatiguability Following Community Line Dancing Classes for Older Women

Falls are a leading cause of injury-related hospitalization among older women. Age-related declines in gait speed and postural stability are known risk-factors for falls. While exercise is well-known to help maintain or improve these losses, only 24.4% of older Canadian women are considered physically active.

Dance can act as a fun and social way to engage older women in exercise. Line dancing in particular has been shown to improve gait speed, knee extensor strength and endurance; however high doses are needed to achieve gains. Clifford and colleagues found that program lengths of 24 hours are needed to effect change, while Merome and colleagues recommend 3 hours per week. These high training doses may not be feasible for participants or community centres who offer programming. The time to commute to classes, find parking and caregiver roles at home are all cited as barriers to physical activity. We also propose that BFR could be a novel addition to increase the physiologic strain of online dance classes, which we hypothesize have a lower intensity and thereby lead to less fitness adaptations. Online classes are of interest as they can serve to reduce barriers to physical activity often experienced by older adults in Canada.

  • We propose online dance classes have reduced efficacy in stimulating adaptations to gait speed, strength and endurance when compared to in-person classes.
  • We propose blood flow restriction (BFR) as a novel addition to dance classes in order to aid in reaching physiological overload in more efficient time-frame.

BFR works by partially reducing blood flowing in and out of working muscles, thereby reducing oxygen availability, promoting anaerobic energy pathways and keeping metabolites in the muscles for a longer time period. Numerous studies have confirmed that when combined with low-intensity exercise BFR is capable of producing similar strength gains as high-intensity exercise. Additionally, BFR is safe and has been widely used among older adults and individuals with various medical conditions, including cardiovascular conditions.

While the benefits of BFR for muscle strength and hypertrophy have been greatly studied, there is limited research on its effects on gait and postural stability. Additionally, there is minimal research on potential combinations of BFR with dance-based activity.

  • This study will examine the differences between online and in-person delivery of 90 minute line dance classes on the postural stability and gait of older females over 10-weeks.
  • This study will then investigate the effects of combining BFR with 10-weeks of 90 minute line dancing classes for the postural stability and gait of older females.

Finally, muscle oxygenation and kinematic analysis will be conducted to help provide insight into any potential changes in gait and postural stability.

The intervention will consist of 10-weeks of line dancing classes, during which half the groups will be randomized to wear elasticized BFR bands pulled tight to a 7/10 of perceived pressure. Classes will be once per week for 90 minutes and will include a warm-up, 4 pre-set choreographies and a cool down. Breaks will be provided throughout the class.

Assessments will occur at pre, mid and post.

Gait will be assessed during a 6-minute walk test. During the test, participants will be filmed from a sagittal view to obtain kinematics. They will also be asked to wear a heart-rate monitor and muscle oxygenation sensors on their lower limbs.

Postural stability will be assessed via 30-seconds of quiet standing on force plates in conditions of eyes open, eyes closed and foam. Participants will also be asked to wear an accelerometer on their upper back during the assessment to obtain correlation to force plate data.

Functional strength will be assessed using 30-second sit to stand (with a secondary timer to obtain 5 time sit to stand length) and the Calf-Raise Senior test. Dynamic balance and mobility will be evaluated using the Functional Reach Test, and the Timed Up and Go in both single and dual-tasks. Aerobic capacity will be measured using a 3 minute Step Test while the participant wears a heart-rate monitor and muscle oxygenation sensors.

Finally scales of fears of falling, social connectedness, and overall mental health will be collected.

It is expected that this study will have great practical implications as the accessibility of this program can provide opportunities to older adults from various remote locations to increase their levels of physical activity in a safe manner. The affordability may also aid in adoption by community health and recreation centers as an easy-to-implement program that helps to improve the postural stability and gait of older women, thereby promoting independence and quality of life.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Kanada, H3G 1M8
        • Rekrutierung
        • Concordia University
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Emma H Chen
        • Unterermittler:
          • Rudy Grief

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

60 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Weiblich

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Healthy older adults (60+ years old)
  • Comprehension of spoken English
  • Able to visit Concordia University for all testing sessions
  • No contraindication for physical activity from their physician
  • For online arm: Access to a device with a webcam, Zoom and stable internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Occurrence/onset of a stroke, vertigo, concussion or lower-extremity injury during the 10-week intervention period
  • Presence of venous thromboembolism, peripheral vascular disease or sickle cell anemia
  • Vacations during the study period

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Fakultätszuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Online dance classes without BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes on Zoom. Classes are structured with a 10 minute warm-up that reviews basic line-dancing steps, 4 dances of choreography (32 counts that repeat throughout the whole song, no tags, primarily facing forward), followed by cool-down stretches.

Aktiver Komparator: In-person dance classes without BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes at a local community centre. Classes will follow the same structure as the online program.

Experimental: Online dancing with BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes on Zoom. Classes are structured with a 10 minute warm-up that reviews basic line-dancing steps, 4 dances of choreography (32 counts that repeat throughout the whole song, no tags, primarily facing forward), followed by cool-down stretches.

Participants in the BFR group will be asked to wear 5 centimetre elasticized BFR bands on their proximal thighs at a 7/10 of perceived tightness during the dance classes.

Experimental: In-person dancing with BFR

Participants will complete 10 weeks of beginner level line dancing classes, once per week for 90-minutes at a local community centre. Classes will follow the same structure as the online program.

Participants in the BFR group will be asked to wear 5 centimetre elasticized BFR bands on their proximal thighs at a 7/10 of perceived tightness during the dance classes.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Gait Speed
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in gait speed during a 6 Minute Walk Test reported as m/s.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Postural Stability
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Change postural stability during 30 second trials of quiet standing (conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, foam). Forceplate data will be processed according to recommendations by Quijoux and colleagues (2021) postural sway will be reported in cm.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Functional Strength - Sit to Stand
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in repetitions on 30 second Sit-to-Stand.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Functional Strength - Calf Strength
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes repetitions on the Calf Raise Senior Test.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Aerobic Capacity - Muscle Oxygenation
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's muscle oxygenation monitors during a 3 minute aerobic step test and 1 minute recovery period. The monitors will be worn on the participants gastrocnemius muscles and their vastus lateralis. Reported as %SmO2.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Muscle Oxygenation
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's muscle oxygenation monitors during the 6 Minute Walk Test. The monitors will be worn on the participants gastrocnemius muscles and their vastus lateralis to gait insight into oxygen delivery and consumption during walking. Reported as %SmO2.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Aerobic Capacity - Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's heart rate during a 3 minute aerobic step test and 1 minute recovery period. Participants will also be wearing muscle oxygenation monitors on their gastrocnemius muscles and on their vastus lateralis.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in the slope, peaks and plateaus of participant's heart rate during the 6 Minute Walk Test. The monitors will be worn around the participant's chest while walking.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Gait - Kinematics
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Changes in participant's step length and cadence during the 6 Minute Walk Test will be reported. The parameters will come from a camera placed sagittally during the 6 Minute-Walk Test.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Mobility
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Timed Up and Go test in 3 conditions (single task, cognitive dual-task counting backwards by 3s, mobility dual-task holding water). The time to do each will be reported.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Dynamic Balance
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete a standing Functional Reach Test and the distance in cm will be recorded.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Number of Falls
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to report any falls during the intervention period. The number of falls experienced will be reported.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Fear of Falls
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Falls Efficacy Scale-International scale. Min score = 16, max score = 64. A higher score of 64 indicates a severe concern about falling.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Survey - Balance Confidence
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Min score = 0, Max score = 100. 100 indicates complete confidence in the ability to maintain balance.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) to mid-testing (week 5) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Social Participation
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Self-efficacy for Social Participation scale (12-item). A total score of 0 indicates not confident at all, while a maximum score of 36 indicates complete confidence.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Social Support
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Duke Social Support Index (11-item). Minimum score of 11 indicates low connectedness while a maximum of 33 indicates greater perceived social support.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Depression
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Geriatric Depression Scale: Short Form. Min score = 0, max score = 15. A higher score indicates greater likelihood of depression.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).
Surveys - Anxiety
Zeitfenster: Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Participants will be asked to complete the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. Min score = 0, Max score = 20. I higher score indicates greater feelings of worry or anxiety.

Comparing pre-testing (week 0) and post-testing (week 10).

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. September 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juni 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

26. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

30. September 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. Oktober 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. Oktober 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

30. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren