Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications Consortium: Study 3 (CNTRACS)
Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications Consortium
In Study 3, all tasks and models from Aim 1 will be evaluated in a large community sample of online participants recruited through Prolific.
Aim 3 will establish 1) requirements for testing computational algorithms in population-based samples, 2) whether task length is optimal, and 3) whether computational parameters help predict psychopathology (hallucinations and delusions in particular) in the general population, and how these predictors may be impacted by demographic variables, such as race, ethnicity, gender, age and other social determinants of health.
Participant demographics will be matched to the U.S. Census 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) data release (updated as available). MPI MacDonald has successfully recruited large online samples for over a decade.
Specifically, researchers will recruit two samples of n=2,000 to preregister hypotheses and then n=3,000 to independently confirm those hypotheses. Multiple methods will affirm the highest quality human self-report and behavioral data for online samples.
Researchers use Prolific, which is known for high quality research participation, maintaining low levels of bots through strategies such as requiring a photo ID and a waiting period. Second, inclusion criteria will require an approval rating of 90-100% from previous researchers. Participants will complete three sessions, each limited to ~60 min to avoid burnout.
研究概览
地位
详细说明
Researchers will recruit two samples of 2,000 to preregister hypotheses and then 3,000 to independently confirm those hypotheses.
Multiple methods will affirm the highest quality human self-report and behavioral data for online samples. First, researchers will use Prolific, which is known for high quality research participation, maintaining low levels of bots through strategies such as requiring a photo ID and a waiting period. Participants will complete 3 sessions, each limited to ~60 min to avoid burnout. Researchers anticipate complete data from 74% of participants, based on data completion rates in the previous online study.
General Cognitive Ability. Researchers will include standard general cognitive measures to assess the specificity of effects beyond general cognitive impairment. Specifically, researchers will include validated online measures from TestMyBrain (https://www.testmybrain.org/using-tmb/research.html; Digit Symbol Coding, Vocabulary, and Matrix Reasoning), as in our prior work in both clinical and healthy populations.
Self-Report Questionnaires: Researchers will use the Beliefs about Voices Scale which assesses attributions about the origin and power of voices, and the Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) scale, which evaluates the extent to which people feel they can exert control over their voices. Researchers will also use the Peters Delusion Inventory to assess the extent of delusional thinking, supplemented by the Green Paranoia Scale, which provides additional coverage of persecutory beliefs. To assess specificity, researchers will use the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess depression, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)78 to assess anxiety, and the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) to assess anhedonia and motivation with the addition of additional measures of psychosis (Aberrant Salience Inventory, Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief), alcohol use (AUDIT), cannabis use (Daily Sessions, Frequency, Age of Onset, and Quantity of Cannabis Use Inventory), and tobacco and other substance use (World Health Organization (WHO) Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test), as researchers will not have a Stuctured Clinical Interview (SCID) for on-line participants.
Researchers will also measure daily functioning using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0. Validity questions and procedures will be included. These measures will take 30 mins to complete, as researchers found in prior studies. Researchers will conduct a principal components analysis (PCA) on measures of the same construct (e.g., delusions) and perform primary analyses using the first principal component, followed by secondary analyses of specific measures False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Deanna Barch, PhD
- 电话号码:314-935-8729
- 邮箱:dbarch@wustl.edu
学习地点
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis、Minnesota、美国、55455
- 招聘中
- University of Minnesota
-
接触:
- Angus MacDonald III, PhD
- 电话号码:612-624-3813
- 邮箱:angus@umn.edu
-
接触:
- UMN Study Team
- 电话号码:651-558-1275
- 邮箱:CNTRACS@umn.edu
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis、Missouri、美国、63130
- 招聘中
- Washington University
-
接触:
- Deanna Barch, PhD
- 电话号码:314-935-8729
- 邮箱:dbarch@wustl.edu
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Residents of the U.S.
- between 18-59 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Resides outside of U.S.
- under 18 or over 59 years of age
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:基础科学
- 分配:不适用
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sine Wave Speech Task Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
Percentage of trials coded as speech or not vs Dprime |
1 hour
|
|
Minnesota Trust Game Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
Percent of trusting choices depending on decision-agent and temptation vs. spite-guilt beliefs estimate |
1 hour
|
|
Dynamic Trust Game Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
Trust indexed by mean investment versus learning rates |
1 hour
|
|
Motion Perception Task Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
With 15 degrees of initial or changed direction vs. the probability of failing to update |
1 hour
|
|
Volatility Task Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
Percent correct bag captures during periods of stability vs. instability - patients worse in both, but particularly impaired ininstability vs. Environmental volatility belief parameter |
1 hour
|
|
Choice Probabilistic Reversal Performance Task
大体时间:1 hour
|
Win-switch rate (higher in patients, particularly paranoid patients) vs. (prior on volatility belief updating in response tovolatility |
1 hour
|
|
Kamin Blocking Task Performance
大体时间:1 hour
|
Number of times participant predict allergy following blocked cue vs. prediction errors and learning rates |
1 hour
|
合作者和调查者
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Deanna Barch, PhD、Washington University School of Medicine
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Li C, Boudewyn MA, Barch DM, Carter CS, Frank MJ, Gold JM, MacDonald AW 3rd, Ragland JD, Silverstein SM, Yonelinas A, Luck SJ, Erickson MA. Impacted and preserved sub-domains of cognitive control in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia. 2026 Sep 9;230:109503. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109503. Epub 2026 May 25.
- MacDonald AW, Patzelt E, Kurth-Nelson Z, Barch DM, Carter CS, Gold JM, Ragland JD, Silverstein SM. Computational modeling of reversal learning impairments in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder reveals shared failure to exploit rewards. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Apr;134(3):262-271. doi: 10.1037/abn0000944. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
- Erickson MA, Boudewyn MA, Winsler K, Li C, Barch DM, Carter CS, Frank MJ, Gold JM, MacDonald AW 3rd, Ragland JD, Silverstein SM, Yonelinas A, Luck SJ. Dysfunctional Alpha Modulation as a Mechanism of Working Memory Impairment in Serious Mental Illness. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Dec;9(12):1271-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.022. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
- Boudewyn MA, Erickson MA, Winsler K, Ragland JD, Yonelinas A, Frank M, Silverstein SM, Gold J, MacDonald AW 3rd, Carter CS, Barch DM, Luck SJ. Managing EEG studies: How to prepare and what to do once data collection has begun. Psychophysiology. 2023 Nov;60(11):e14365. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14365. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
- Kwashie AN, Ma Y, Barch DM, Chafee M, Ragland JD, Silverstein SM, Carter CS, Gold JM, MacDonald AW 3rd. Comparing the functional neuroanatomy of proactive and reactive control between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):203-215. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01036-6. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
- Liu RG, Frank MJ. Hierarchical clustering optimizes the tradeoff between compositionality and expressivity of task structures for flexible reinforcement learning. Artif Intell. 2022 Nov;312:103770. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2022.103770. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
- Pratt DN, Barch DM, Carter CS, Gold JM, Ragland JD, Silverstein SM, MacDonald AW. Reliability and Replicability of Implicit and Explicit Reinforcement Learning Paradigms in People With Psychotic Disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2021 Apr 29;47(3):731-739. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa165.
- Hamid AA, Frank MJ, Moore CI. Wave-like dopamine dynamics as a mechanism for spatiotemporal credit assignment. Cell. 2021 May 13;184(10):2733-2749.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- 201904012: Study 3
- 2R01MH084840 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
Our plan is to share de-identified participant data through the National Data Archive (NDA) as required bythe National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.