Atherosclerosis Prevention in Pediatric Lupus Erythematosus (APPLE)

July 15, 2013 updated by: Laura Schanberg

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Lipitor (Atorvastatin) in Reducing the Progression of Carotid IMT in Early Childhood SLE

The purpose of this study is:

  1. To assess the efficacy of a lipid-lowering agent (atorvastatin) on the development of atherosclerosis that predisposes children with SLE to cardiovascular events in adulthood.
  2. To assess the safety of intermediate-term (36 months) treatment of children and young adults with atorvastatin.
  3. To further characterize the course of SLE in children and young adults, by establishing a cohort of pediatric SLE patients to be followed prospectively.
  4. To establish a mechanism for conducting clinical trials in rare pediatric rheumatic diseases using the Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Children and adolescents with SLE represent 15% of all SLE patients. Children with SLE suffer high morbidity that affects many organ systems, reduces their quality of life, and shortens their lifespan. As more children with SLE survive into adulthood, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has emerged as a major concern. SLE is a significant risk factor for myocardial infarction and death in young premenopausal women with SLE, even after controlling for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Acceleration of atherogenesis in SLE most likely reflects SLE-associated vascular immune and inflammatory changes.

Although limited, the data on cardiovascular and lipid abnormalities in children with SLE implicate atherosclerosis as an important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality. The 3-hydroxy-3-methlglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, reduce mortality and morbidity from atherosclerosis in adults and have intrinsic anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory properties. These anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory activities may have particular benefit in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis in SLE. This trial will evaluate atorvastatin in children with SLE in the largest cohort of pediatric SLE patients ever studied prospectively.

Children in this study will be randomized to receive either atorvastatin or a placebo. All children will be followed for 3 years, during which they will have 15 study visits. Study visits will generally last 2 hours and will include medical interview, medication review and pill count, physical examination, and blood and urine tests. Cardiovascular-specific outcome measures will include assessments of high sensitivity CRP; fasting lipid profile; homocysteine level; apolipoprotein A, B1, and Lp(a); carotid intima media thickness (IMT); and tensor diffusion/MRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

221

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27715
        • Duke Medical Center / Duke Clinical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised diagnostic guidelines for SLE
  • Weight of 25 kg (55 lbs) or more
  • Outpatient
  • Ability to complete self-report questionnaires in either English or Spanish
  • Willingness to comply with recommended diet
  • Acceptable methods of contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Drug-induced lupus
  • Liver disease (ALT or aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2 X normal value)
  • Myositis (CK greater than 3 X normal value)
  • Inability to obtain adequate-quality IMT images
  • Current use of oral or parenteral tacrolimus or cyclosporine
  • Dialysis or serum creatinine reater than 2.5 mg/dL
  • Active nephrotic syndrome (urinary protein greater than 3 g/24 h and serum albumin less than 2.3 g/dl)
  • Total cholesterol greater than 350 mg/dL
  • Xanthoma
  • Familial hypercholesterolemia
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Use of estrogen-containing contraceptives (e.g., Lo-Ovral)
  • Unable to adhere to study regimen
  • Life-threatening non-SLE illness that would interfere with ability to complete the study
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • Anticipated poor compliance
  • Participation in another drug intervention study within 30 days of study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Patients will be treated with dietary intervention (AHA Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes [TLC] diet, [http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/cgi-bin/chd/step2intro.cgi]), cardiovascular risk factor reduction counseling, hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, a multivitamin containing folate, plus atorvastatin at 10 mg or 20 mg depending on the patient's weight. Patients weighing more than 50 kg will receive 10 mg qd atorvastatin for the first month, which will be increased to 20 mg qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.
Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of atorvastatin po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.
Other Names:
  • Lipitor
  • Atorvastatin Calcium
Placebo Comparator: 2
Patients will be treated with dietary intervention (AHA Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes [TLC] diet, [http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/cgi-bin/chd/step2intro.cgi]), cardiovascular risk factor reduction counseling, hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, a multivitamin containing folate, plus placebo at 10 mg or 20 mg depending on the patient's weight. Patients weighing more than 50 kg will receive 10 mg qd placebo for the first month, which will be increased to 20 mg qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.
Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of placebo po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean-Mean Common Carotid IMT (CIMT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the common carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, left common near wall mean and left common far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean common CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean-Max CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For each side, segment and wall, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left common near wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Mean CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For each side, segment and wall, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common near wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Common CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For each side and wall of the common carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, left common near wall max and left common far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max common CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Internal CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For each side and wall of the internal carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max internal CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Mean Internal CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the internal carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean internal CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Bifurcation CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For each side and wall of the bifurcation arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max and left bifurcation far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Mean Bifurcation CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the bifurcation arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean and left bifurcation far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Far Wall CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the far wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal far wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, and left internal far wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Mean Far Wall CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the far wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Near Wall CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the near wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right internal near wall max, left common near wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, and left internal near wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max near wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Mean Near Wall CIMT
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
For the near wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right internal near wall mean, left common near wall mean, left bifurcation wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Natural Log of mg/L for hsCRP
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Triglycerides
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Lipoprotein A
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months
Change in Homocysteine
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 36 months
Change from baseline to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura E. Schanberg, MD, Duke Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2003

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2003

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2003

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Clinical Trials on Atorvastatin

Subscribe