Flu/TBI in Treating Patients Not Responding to Previous Hormone Therapy

May 31, 2012 updated by: OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Pilot Trial of Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Patients With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

RATIONALE: Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine, and radiation therapy before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also stops the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after transplant may stop this from happening.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving fludarabine together with total-body irradiation works in treating patients who are undergoing a donor stem cell transplant for progressive metastatic prostate cancer that has not responded to previous hormone therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the treatment-related mortality in patients with hormone-refractory, progressive metastatic prostate cancer treated with nonmyeloablative conditioning comprising fludarabine and total-body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OUTLINE:

  • Nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen: Patients receive fludarabine IV on days -4 to -2 and total-body irradiation (TBI) on day 0.
  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT): After TBI, patients undergo AHSCT on day 0.
  • Immunosuppression: Patients receive oral cyclosporine twice daily on days -3 to 56 followed by a taper until day 81. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil twice daily on days 0-27 (if patient has a related donor) OR three times daily on days 0-29 and then twice daily on days 30-149 followed by additional tapering until day 180 (if patient has an unrelated donor).

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 10 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    • Metastatic and progressive disease
    • Refractory to hormonal therapy
  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 5 ng/mL
  • Previously treated with a docetaxel-based regimen
  • No CNS metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Performance status

  • Karnofsky 70-100%

Life expectancy

  • More than 6 months

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST and ALT < 4 times ULN

Renal

  • Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min

Cardiovascular

  • LVEF > 35%
  • No symptomatic congestive heart failure

Pulmonary

  • DLCO > 40% of predicted OR
  • Total lung capacity or FEV_1 > 30% of predicted

Other

  • HIV negative

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Chemotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics

Endocrine therapy

  • See Disease Characteristics

PATIENT AND DONOR SELECTION CRITERIA

4.1 Patient Inclusion Criteria:

4.1.1 Males aged 18-75.

4.1.2 Pathologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with metastases and progressive disease (new metastatic lesions or increase in cancer-related pain or a rising PSA defined by consensus criteria. (A rising PSA will be defined as 2 measurements higher than an initial value. The second of the 3 measurements must be at least 7 days after the first).

4.1.3 Progressive disease despite hormonal management (including antiandrogen withdrawal, 6 weeks for bicalutamide, 4 weeks for flutamide or nilutamide)

4.1.4 PSA > 5 ng/mL

4.1.5 Serum testosterone level < 50 ng/mL

4.1.6 Prior treatment with a docetaxel-based regimen.

4.1.7 Performance status: Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) 70-100%. (Appendix III).

4.1.8 Signed informed patient consent.

4.2 Patient Exclusion criteria:

4.2.1 Expected survival less than 6 months

4.2.2 Active central nervous system involvement or spinal instability

4.2.3 Organ dysfunction:

4.2.3.1 Cardiac: Ejection fraction <35% or symptomatic congestive heart failure.

4.2.3.2 Pulmonary: DLCO <40% of predicted or either TLC or FEV1 < 30% predicted.

4.2.3.3 Liver dysfunction: serum total bilirubin >2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or either ALT or AST >4x ULN

4.2.3.4 Renal dysfunction: creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min

4.2.4 HIV seropositivity

4.2 Related Donor Inclusion criteria:

4.3.1 Age 18-75

4.3.2 Related to the patient and genotypically or phenotypically HLA-identical. (Appendix IV)

4.3.3 Able to give consent to peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and apheresis collection. Bone marrow donors are not eligible.

4.3 Unrelated Donor Inclusion criteria:

4.4.1 Age 18-75.

4.4.2 Unrelated donors who are prospectively:

4.4.2.1 Matched for HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles by high resolution typing AND 4.4.2.2 Matched for all serologically recognized HLA-A or -B or -C antigens and at least five of six HLA-A or -B or -C alleles as defined by Appendix IV.

4.4.3 Able to give consent to peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and apheresis collection. Bone marrow unrelated donors are not eligible.

4.4 Related and Unrelated Donor Exclusion criteria:

4.5.1 Identical twin.

4.5.2 Any contraindication to the administration of G-CSF for mobilization.

4.5.3 Serious medical or psychological illness.

4.5.4 Prior malignancy within the preceding five years, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers.

4.5.5 HIV seropositivity.

4.5.6 The donor is pregnant, has a positive serum ßhCG or is lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fludarabine, TBI, Cyclosporine, MMF

Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day x 3, day -4 to day -2 TBI 200 cGy x 1, day 0 For related donors: cyclosporine (CSP) 5 mg/kg p.o. bid, day -3 to day +56, then taper by 20% every 5 days to be completed by day +81 For related donors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg p.o. q 12 hours, day 0 to day +27, then stop

For unrelated donors: cyclosporine (CSP) 5 mg/kg p.o. bid, day -3 to day +56, then taper by 20% every 5 days to be completed by day +81 For unrelated donors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg tid day +0 to day +29, 15 mg/kg bid day +30 to day +149, and then taper by 25% per week from day +150 to day +180. Discontinue by day +181.

Conditioning:

Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day x 3, day -4 to day -2 TBI 200 cGy x 1, day 0

Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation:

Infusion of peripheral blood stem cells, day 0

Immunosuppression:

For related donors: cyclosporine (CSP) 5 mg/kg p.o. bid, day -3 to day +56, then taper by 20% every 5 days to be completed by day +81 For related donors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg p.o. q 12 hours, day 0 to day +27, then stop

For unrelated donors: cyclosporine (CSP) 5 mg/kg p.o. bid, day -3 to day +56, then taper by 20% every 5 days to be completed by day +81 For unrelated donors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg tid day +0 to day +29, 15 mg/kg bid day +30 to day +149, and then taper by 25% per week from day +150 to day +180. Discontinue by day +181.

Other Names:
  • Mini Transplant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Treatment-related mortality as measured by Kaplan-Meier at 5 years following transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Safety by CTCAE v 3.0 at 100 days following transplant
Response rate by RECIST criteria at 5 years following transplant
Time to progression by Kaplan-Meier at 5 years following transplant
Overall survival by Kaplan-Meier at 5 years following transplant
Response as measured by a 50% reduction in the prostate-specific antigen at 5 years following transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Brandon M. Hayes-Lattin, MD, Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CDR0000447211
  • OHSU-SOL-04109-L (Other Identifier: OHSU)
  • OHSU-373 (Other Identifier: OHSU)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe