To Compare the Octopus 311 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer 700 Series

March 2, 2012 updated by: Haag Streit USA

To Compare the Octopus 311 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer 700 Series With Respect to Reliability, Reproducibility, Test Duration, Patient Preference, Technician Preference.

To compare the Octopus 311 and the HFA 700 series

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To compare the Octopus 311 and the HFA 700 series to evaluate reliability, reproducibility, test duration, patient preference and technician preference.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Capital Eye Consultants

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All subjects

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior Visual Field

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scotopic pupil less than 3 mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Haag Streit USA

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Powers, O.D., American, Virginia and Northern Virginia Optometric Associations

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSOCT001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe