Treatment Intensity/Factors Predicting Short and Long Term Outcomes in Elderly Critically Ill Patients

August 22, 2012 updated by: Hassan Khouli, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Treatment Intensity and Factors Predicting Short and Long Term Outcomes in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units

  1. Patients greater than 90 years of age will have poorer outcomes in terms of mortality than younger patients controlling for disease and acuity
  2. Patients greater than 90 years old will consume more resources than younger patients controlling for disease and acuity
  3. Patients greater than 90 years old will show lower levels of function than younger patients controlling for disease and acuity
  4. Patients greater than 90 years old will show lower levels of HRQOL at 90-120 days post ICU discharge than younger patients controlling for disease and acuity

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Elderly patients make up between 26% and 51% of patients who are admitted to ICUs. The proportion of individuals in North America aged > 65 is projected to increase to 20% of the population by 2026. As population demographics change, and as new technologies, pharmaceuticals, and interventions prolong lives, the proportion of elderly patients admitted to ICUs and surviving ICU stay will continue to increase. Studies that have examined only ICU or hospital survival as an outcome have had variable results. Few studies have demonstrated that elderly ICU patients experience higher mortality rates, while others have demonstrated that age alone, when adjusted for other factors, is not an important prognostic indicator among elderly patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICU). However, age is still used as an important criteria for admission to ICUs. Most studies reviewed have looked at patients sixty-five to ninety years old. To our knowledge only two studies to date have addressed this issue among patients older than 90 to an ICU, both were retrospective.

With increasing age there is a parallel increase in health care costs. The use of expensive technology and procedures in the very elderly is fast becoming a major concern. Data on resource allocation and treatment intensity in the (90+) subgroup is sparse.

Beyond mortality and cost, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a fundamentally important end point of medical care. Few studies have addressed outcomes in terms of HRQOL and functional status of elderly following discharge the from critical care unit. These studies were limited by small number of subjects enrolled, retrospective design, and lack of validated tool to assess HRQOL.

We plan to prospectively collect data to look at determinants of treatment intensity, outcome, and resource allocation in elderly patients ages 65 and above admitted to the ICU with care taken to including as many patients in the age interval above 90 years of age. We will also assess HRQOL and functional status in very elderly patients who survive admission and are discharged from the hospital.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

399

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically Ill Elderly Patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 65 year an older Admitted to MICU, SICU, and CCU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to complete HRQL questionaire while hospitalized
  • Subjects refuse to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 06-171

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe