A Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise Training Among Men With Type 2-diabetes

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strength Versus Aerobic Exercise Training to Improve Glycemic Control in Men With Type 2-diabetes

To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in change in HbA1C among men with type 2-diabetes after an exercise intervention with strength versus endurance training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Exercise training is well documented as part of effective treatment for type 2-diabetes patients. Endurance training has been suggested as the most suitable form of exercise. There are reasons to believe that strength training also has a positive effect. However, comparisons of endurance training and strength training regimes are limited.

Therefore we randomized 26 men with type 2-diabetes to either an endurance training group or a strength training group. Both groups exercised three sessions per week for three months. The training was supervised.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • NTNU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with type 2-diabetes
  • Male, 35-71 years
  • Managing their diabetes through a lifestyle and/or the drug metformin only
  • Able to participate in either of the exercise groups

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic cardiovascular disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Physical or cognitive disabilities that will interfere with participating in the exercise regimes.
  • Trained consistently during the last six months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: endurance training
supervised endurance training
supervised endurance training. Three sessions per week in three months.
Other Names:
  • Aerobic training
Experimental: strength training
Supervised strength training
Supervised strength training. Three sessions per week in three months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
HbA1C
Time Frame: 12.01.08
12.01.08

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
body composition, C-peptid, BP, Cholesterol (LDL, HDL), Triglycerides
Time Frame: 12.01.08
12.01.08

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Liv B Augestad, PhD, National Taiwan Normal University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Moe B, Augestad LB, Åsvold BO, Flanders WD. Effects of aerobic versus resistance training on glycaemic control in men with type 2 diabetes. European Journal of Sports Science 11(5): 365-374, 2011

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe