Evaluation of the Patient Safety Screening Tool (PSST) for Sepsis

April 19, 2017 updated by: John Allan Barwis, Vanderbilt University

A Validation of a Patient Safety Screening Tool for Sepsis

The Patient Safety Screening Tool (PSST) for Sepsis solution is a tool to assist with the early detection of Sepsis and management of the administration of bundle packages as defined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). This web based application relies on integration with bedside medical equipment (BME) data as well as Lab and Registration data so that clinical workflow items can be automated in the fight against Sepsis.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The workflow that is automated by the PSST for Sepsis solution is tightly integrated with Registration, Bedside Monitoring Equipment (BME), and Lab data. As patients arrive in the unit, workflow activities are started with patient context. Typical implementations of the IHI guidelines for Sepsis screening dictate that patients are rescreened on regular intervals to detect Sepsis. The PSST for Sepsis solution will monitor Lab and BME data stores and continually update the screening forms for a particular patient. It will also alert clinicians when a manual screen is required in the Microsoft InfoPath form. The constant screening loop is managed by the PSST for Sepsis solution and will continue to run until the patient screens positive for Severe Sepsis, or moves to the next workflow of auditing a patient with Sever Sepsis.

When patients reach a state of "positive screen" (either manually, or through the automated data monitors) the PSST for Sepsis solution will move this patient from a screening workflow to an auditing workflow automatically. The PSST for Sepsis solution will then monitor the treatment process through Microsoft InfoPath form posts and alert clinicians when treatment goals have not been met. After a successful auditing process and completion of the 6 and 24 hour bundles, the patient will be placed back into a screening workflow. The end result is that patients will remain in a screening/auditing workflow loop until the patient is discharged from the unit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

221

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will be located in the 22 bed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Neuro Care Unit (NCU). Every patient will be screened for sepsis according to the following workflow upon admission to the NCU. The patient population of the NCU is generally bimodal; the first group consists of post-operative patients with an average length of stay of three to five days. The second group consists of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with an average length of stay of 45 days.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are hospitalized in the Neuro Care Unit (NCU)
  • Patients that are hospitalized in the Vanderbilt Burn Center
  • Patients must be > 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients < 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
Patients in the NCU at VUH

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Demonstrate a reduction in time to detection of sepsis using the PSST Alert System
Time Frame: 6 and 24 hours
6 and 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine the accuracy of the PSST Alert System
Time Frame: 6 and 24 hours
6 and 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John A Barwise, M.D., Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe