Single-dose Study to Assess Efficacy of Canakinumab (ACZ885) in Patients With Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) (β-SPECIFIC 1)

February 28, 2017 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Single-dose Study to Assess the Initial Efficacy of Canakinumab (ACZ885) With Respect to the Adapted ACR Pediatric 30 Criteria in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) and Active Systemic Manifestations

This study assessed the initial efficacy and safety of canakinumab over a 4 week period in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) having a flare. Response to treatment will be according to the adapted American College of Rheumatology(ACR)Pediatric 30 criteria at Day 15.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Capital Federal, Argentina
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • La Plata, Argentina
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gent, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Laeken, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Porto Alegre, Brazil
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Calgary, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Arhus N, Denmark
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lyon, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Strassbourg, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bad Bamstedt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bremen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Garmisch-Partenkirch, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Geissen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Krefeld, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mainz, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Saint Augustin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tubingen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Thessaloniki, Greece
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Haifa, Israel
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kfar Saba, Israel
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Petach-Tikva, Israel
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ramat Gan, Israel
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rehovot, Israel
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bologna, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Firenze, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Genova, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Milano, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Napoli, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Padova, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rome, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Scafati, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Torino, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lima, Peru
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pretoria, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Durban
      • Berea, Durban, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mayville, Durban, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zurich, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New Castle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Norwich, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72202
        • Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Inst
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University Of Chicago Medical Center
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts New England Medical Center-Dept. of Allergy
    • New Jersey
      • Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 07039
        • St. Barnabas Ambulatory Care Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Children's Hospital Medical Center
      • Cinncinati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Children's Hospital/Neurology
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97227
        • Legacy Emanuel Hospital
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97232
        • Legacy Emanual Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78723
        • Specially For Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis as per ILAR definition that must have occurred at least 2 months prior to enrollment with onset of disease < 16 years of age:

    • Arthritis in one or more joints with or preceded by fever of at least 2 weeks duration that is documented to be daily/quotidian for at least 3 days and accompanied by one or more of the following:
    • evanescent nonfixed erythematous rash,
    • generalized lymph node enlargement,
    • hepatomegaly and/ or splenomegaly,
    • serositis
  2. Parent's or legal guardian's written informed consent and child's assent, if appropriate, or patient's informed consent for ≥ 18 years of age
  3. Male and female patients aged ≥ 2 to < 20 years of age
  4. Active disease at the time of enrollment defined as follows:

    • At least 2 joints with active arthritis
    • Documented spiking, intermittent fever (body temperature > 38°C) for at least 1 day during the screening period within 1 week before first canakinumab/placebo dose
    • C-reactive protein (CRP) > 30 mg/L (normal range < 10 mg/L)
  5. Naïve to canakinumab
  6. Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who fulfilled one or more of the following criteria were not eligible for inclusion in this study:

  1. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) female patients
  2. Female patients having reached sexual maturity unless their career, lifestyle, or sexual orientation precluded intercourse with a male partner and/or they were using an acceptable method of contraception
  3. History of hypersensitivity to study drug or to biologics.
  4. Diagnosis of active macrophage-activation syndrome (MAS) (Ravelli, Magni-Manzoni and Pistorio 2005) within the last 6 months
  5. With active or recurrent bacterial, fungal or viral infection, including patients with evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection
  6. Other protocol defined exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Canakinumab
Patients received a single dose of subcutaneous(sc) injection of canakinumab (4 mg/kg) on Day 1. Maximal total single dose of canakinumab allowed was 300 mg. Any patient who required a dose greater than 150 mg (patients>37.5 kg) received two sc injections.
Canakinumab was supplied in individual 6 mL glass vials each containing 150 mg canakinumab powder as a lyophilized cake. Each reconstituted vial provided 150mg of canakinumab per 1 mL.
Other Names:
  • ACZ885
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients received a single dose matching placebo of canakinumab on day 1.
Placebo was provided in individual 6 mL glass vials each containing 150 mg placebo powder matching canakinumab as a lyophilized cake. Each reconstitued vial provided 150mg of placebo per 1 mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Who Meet the Adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Adapted ACR Pediatric 30 criteria determined responders (improved from baseline of at least 30% in at least 3 response variables 1-6 and no intermittent fever in preceding week [variable 7], with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening > 30% ) 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity: 0-100 mm VAS 2.Parent/Patient's Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing: 0-100mmVAS in Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) 3. Functional ability: CHAQ 4.Number of joints with active arthritis 5. Number of joints with limited of motion 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation CRP (mg/L)
Baseline, Day 15, Day 29

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Adapted ACR Pediatric 50 Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Adapted ACR Pediatric 50 criteria determined responders (improved from baseline of at least 50% in at least 3 response variables 1-6 and no intermittent fever in preceding week [variable 7], with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening > 30%) 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity: 0-100 mm VAS 2. Parent/Patient's Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing: 0-100mmVAS in Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) 3. Functional ability: CHAQ 4. Number of joints with active arthritis 5. Number of joints with limited of motion 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation CRP (mg/L)
Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Adapted ACR Pediatric 70
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Adapted ACR Pediatric 70 criteria determined responders (improved from baseline of at least 70% in at least 3 response variables 1-6 and no intermittent fever in preceding week [variable 7], with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening > 30% ) 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity: 0-100 mm VAS 2. Parent/Patient's Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing: 0-100mmVAS in Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) 3. Functional ability: CHAQ 4. Number of joints with active arthritis 5. Number of joints with limited of motion 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation CRP(mg/L)
Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Adapted ACR Pediatric 90
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Adapted ACR Pediatric 90 criteria determined responders (improved from baseline of at least 90% in at least 3 response variables 1-6 and no intermittent fever in preceding week [variable 7], with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening > 30% ) 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity: 0-100 mm VAS 2. Parent/Patient's Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing: 0-100mmVAS in Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) 3. Functional ability: CHAQ 4. Number of joints with active arthritis 5. Number of joints with limited of motion 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation CRP(mg/L)
Baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Adapted ACR Pediatric 100
Time Frame: baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Adapted ACR Pediatric 100 criteria determined responders (ie improved from baseline of at least 100% in at least 3 response variables 1-6 and no intermittent fever in preceding week [variable 7], with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening > 30% ) 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity: 0-100 mm VAS 2. Parent/Patient's Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing: 0-100mmVAS in Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) 3. Functional ability: CHAQ 4. Number of joints with active arthritis 5. Number of joints with limited of motion 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation
baseline, Day 15, Day 29
Change in Patient's Pain Intensity as Assessed on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)as Part of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire(CHAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15
CHAQ assessed physical ability and functional status of patients as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items about difficulty in doing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Four response categories range from 'without any difficulty' (0) to 'unable to do' (3). The parent's or patient's pain assessment was on VAS that was part of CHAQ. The VAS scale ranges from no pain (0 mm) to very severe pain (100 mm). Negative change indicates improvement.
Baseline, Day 15
Change in Patient's Pain Intensity as Assessed on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as Part of CHAQ
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 29
CHAQ, assessed physical ability and functional status of patients as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items about difficulty in doing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Four response categories range from 'without any difficulty'(0) to 'unable to do' (3). The parent's or patient's pain assessment was on VAS that was part of CHAQ. The VAS scale ranges from no pain (0 mm) to very severe pain (100 mm). Negative change indicates improvement.
Baseline, Day 29
Percentage of Patients Who Had Body Temperature ≤ 38°C
Time Frame: Day 3
Body temperature was derived from vital signs evaluation. No conversion of body temperature was performed, no matter how it was measured.
Day 3
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Over Time by Use of the Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50)
Time Frame: Over 4 week study period (Baseline, Day 15, Day 29)
CHQ-PF50 measures HRQoL in children 5-18 years old from parent's perspective. Questionnaire completed by parent without input from patient. Total score ranges from 0-100. Increases in scores represent improved well-being in subjects as assessed by their parents. Mixed linear model on change from baseline in CHQ-PF50 score with treatment group, stratification factors, day of assessment and interaction between group and day as covariates. Covariance analysis used a repeated measures approach, so all timepoints over time were taken into account.
Over 4 week study period (Baseline, Day 15, Day 29)
Change in Disability Score Over Time by Use of the CHAQ
Time Frame: At 4 week study period
The disability dimension of CHAQ consisted of 20 multiple choice items about difficulty in doing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Four response categories range from 'without any difficulty'(0) to 'unable to do' (3). Mixed linear model on change from baseline in CHAQ score included treatment group, stratification factors, day of assessment and interaction between group and day as covariates. Negative change indicates improvement.
At 4 week study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe