Tape Versus Semirigid Versus Lace-up Ankle Support in the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury.

February 12, 2016 updated by: Michel P. J. van den Bekerom, Gelre Hospitals

The objective of this study is to compare tape versus semi rigid support versus lace up brace treatment for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries with regard to clinical outcome and cost effectiveness.

There is a difference of 10 in functional outcome (Karlsson Score) between non-elastic adhesive taping and semi-rigid and lace-up ankle support, in favour of the last, for the treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament injury at 6 months follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a single blind prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the difference in functional outcome after treatment with tape versus semi-rigid versus lace-up ankle support (brace) for grade II and III acute lateral ankle ligament injuries. The patients will be randomly allocated into one of the three groups. Randomization will be performed by computer. Blinding of patients is not possible, but the observer will be blinded at eight weeks and six months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands, 7300 DS
        • Gelre Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years
  • Grade II or III ankle sprains
  • Presentation < 72 hours after the acute injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of chronic instability
  • Who had a fracture on X-ray investigation
  • Other injuries or disabilities on the same limb
  • Alcoholism, serious psychiatric and neurological illness
  • Patients with bilaterally sprained ankles
  • Patients with previous surgery on the lateral ankle ligaments
  • Skin diseases where taping is not practicable
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent
  • Patients who are unable to fill out questionnaires
  • Neuromuscular disorders of the lower extremities
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis
  • Gait disturbances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tape
Group I will be treated with non-elastic adhesive tape around the affected ankle, applied by the 'van Unen-technique'. This technique is an alternative for the 'Coumans- technique'. The rationale of taping is to take the load off the injured tissue, to correct the biomechanics, to protect the injured part and to enhance proprioception and awareness of the injured tissue. Different materials can be used alone or in combination. The bandage material must have an adhesive layer which allows it to adhere to the skin and to itself. Since the direct stabilizing effect of a bandage lasts no longer than about half an hour, the positive effect is presumed to occur primarily through traction on the skin which stimulates muscular activity. Taping is a treatment that involves no loss of time, requires no crutches and is not attended with any ultimate impairment of function.
Group I will be treated with non-elastic adhesive tape (Leukotape® Classic) around the affected ankle, applied by the 'van Unen-technique'.18 This technique is an alternative for the 'Coumans- technique'.15 The rationale of taping is to take the load off the injured tissue, to correct the biomechanics, to protect the injured part and to enhance proprioception and awareness of the injured tissue. Different materials can be used alone or in combination. The bandage material must have an adhesive layer which allows it to adhere to the skin and to itself. Since the direct stabilizing effect of a bandage lasts no longer than about half an hour, the positive effect is presumed to occur primarily through traction on the skin which stimulates muscular activity.
Group II will be treated by application of a semi-rigid brace, the M-step® from Medi®. The foam gel in the pads continuously adapts to give an uninterrupted optimal fit to the constantly changing anatomical conditions, which therefore ensures a uniform compression. The ability of the foam gel pad to adapt allows one orthosis to be used for both the left and the right ankle. The pads are very light and have a soft fleecy surface. Even the edges of the outer moldings are generously padded. The M-step ankle orthosis can be quickly and securely applied by means of two Velcro fasteners; the Velcro fasteners can be detached from the outer shells and fixed individually.
Group III will be treated by application of a lace-up brace, the ASO brace. The ASO (Ankle Stabilizing Orthosis) fits into an athletic or street shoe. The ASO is made of thin, durable ballistic nylon - the same protective material used by law enforcement and military personnel. Support is achieved through exclusive non-stretch nylon stabilizing straps that mirror the stirrup technique of an athletic taping application. The calcaneus is captured, effectively locking the heel. The ASO ankle brace holds the ankle in a biomechanical neutral position, reducing either inversion or eversion type injuries or re-injuries.
Active Comparator: Lace-up brace
The ASO (Ankle Stabilizing Orthosis) fits into an athletic or street shoe. The ASO is made of thin, durable ballistic nylon - the same protective material used by law enforcement and military personnel. Support is achieved through exclusive non-stretch nylon stabilizing straps that mirror the stirrup technique of an athletic taping application. The calcaneus is captured, effectively locking the heel. The ASO ankle brace holds the ankle in a biomechanical neutral position, reducing either inversion or eversion type injuries or re-injuries.
Group I will be treated with non-elastic adhesive tape (Leukotape® Classic) around the affected ankle, applied by the 'van Unen-technique'.18 This technique is an alternative for the 'Coumans- technique'.15 The rationale of taping is to take the load off the injured tissue, to correct the biomechanics, to protect the injured part and to enhance proprioception and awareness of the injured tissue. Different materials can be used alone or in combination. The bandage material must have an adhesive layer which allows it to adhere to the skin and to itself. Since the direct stabilizing effect of a bandage lasts no longer than about half an hour, the positive effect is presumed to occur primarily through traction on the skin which stimulates muscular activity.
Group II will be treated by application of a semi-rigid brace, the M-step® from Medi®. The foam gel in the pads continuously adapts to give an uninterrupted optimal fit to the constantly changing anatomical conditions, which therefore ensures a uniform compression. The ability of the foam gel pad to adapt allows one orthosis to be used for both the left and the right ankle. The pads are very light and have a soft fleecy surface. Even the edges of the outer moldings are generously padded. The M-step ankle orthosis can be quickly and securely applied by means of two Velcro fasteners; the Velcro fasteners can be detached from the outer shells and fixed individually.
Group III will be treated by application of a lace-up brace, the ASO brace. The ASO (Ankle Stabilizing Orthosis) fits into an athletic or street shoe. The ASO is made of thin, durable ballistic nylon - the same protective material used by law enforcement and military personnel. Support is achieved through exclusive non-stretch nylon stabilizing straps that mirror the stirrup technique of an athletic taping application. The calcaneus is captured, effectively locking the heel. The ASO ankle brace holds the ankle in a biomechanical neutral position, reducing either inversion or eversion type injuries or re-injuries.
Active Comparator: Semi rigid brace
A semi-rigid brace, the M-step® from Medi®, will be applied. The foam gel in the pads continuously adapts to give an uninterrupted optimal fit to the constantly changing anatomical conditions, which therefore ensures a uniform compression. The ability of the foam gel pad to adapt allows one orthosis to be used for both the left and the right ankle. The pads are very light and have a soft fleecy surface. Even the edges of the outer moldings are generously padded. The M-step ankle orthosis can be quickly and securely applied by means of two Velcro fasteners; the Velcro fasteners can be detached from the outer shells and fixed individually.
Group I will be treated with non-elastic adhesive tape (Leukotape® Classic) around the affected ankle, applied by the 'van Unen-technique'.18 This technique is an alternative for the 'Coumans- technique'.15 The rationale of taping is to take the load off the injured tissue, to correct the biomechanics, to protect the injured part and to enhance proprioception and awareness of the injured tissue. Different materials can be used alone or in combination. The bandage material must have an adhesive layer which allows it to adhere to the skin and to itself. Since the direct stabilizing effect of a bandage lasts no longer than about half an hour, the positive effect is presumed to occur primarily through traction on the skin which stimulates muscular activity.
Group II will be treated by application of a semi-rigid brace, the M-step® from Medi®. The foam gel in the pads continuously adapts to give an uninterrupted optimal fit to the constantly changing anatomical conditions, which therefore ensures a uniform compression. The ability of the foam gel pad to adapt allows one orthosis to be used for both the left and the right ankle. The pads are very light and have a soft fleecy surface. Even the edges of the outer moldings are generously padded. The M-step ankle orthosis can be quickly and securely applied by means of two Velcro fasteners; the Velcro fasteners can be detached from the outer shells and fixed individually.
Group III will be treated by application of a lace-up brace, the ASO brace. The ASO (Ankle Stabilizing Orthosis) fits into an athletic or street shoe. The ASO is made of thin, durable ballistic nylon - the same protective material used by law enforcement and military personnel. Support is achieved through exclusive non-stretch nylon stabilizing straps that mirror the stirrup technique of an athletic taping application. The calcaneus is captured, effectively locking the heel. The ASO ankle brace holds the ankle in a biomechanical neutral position, reducing either inversion or eversion type injuries or re-injuries.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Karlsson score
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding the function of the ankle joint. The score includes eight items based on a subjective evaluation of stability, pain, swelling and stiffness in relation to activities of everyday life, sports and recreational activities, running, stair climbing and working ability. The maximum score is 100 points.
up to 6 months FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to work
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Time to return to work Work at level / below level / no return to work
up to 6 months FU
Return to sports
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Time to return to sports Sports at level / below level /no return to sports
up to 6 months FU
Pain VAS
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
VAS score 0-10: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain
up to 6 months FU
Objective stability
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU

Anterior Drawer Test (ADT). The patient sits on a bench with the legs hanging downwards. The knee joint is flexed and the foot held in 150 plantar flexion. First the healthy ankle is examined. Examination is performed according to van Dijk. 38 The examiner assigned one of the four predetermined numbers to each examined ankle joint, based on the estimated anterior displacement of the talus relative to the tibia.

0 = 0-2mm, 1 = 3-5mm, 2 = 6-10mm and 3 = 11-15mm

up to 6 months FU
Objective stability
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
DAAT. Because the manual ADT is of a subjective nature we measure the instability with the dynamic anterior ankle tester (DAAT). 39 The principle of the test is to apply a force impulse tot the calcaneus, within the muscle reflex time, and to measure anterior-posterior translation and mediolateral rotation. The highest and the lowest score were discarded and the mean of the three remaining scores counted as the result of the test.
up to 6 months FU
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Degrees maximum dorsiflexion to plantarflexion
up to 6 months FU
Recurrent inversion injury
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Yes/no Number of sprains per month
up to 6 months FU
Complications / adverse events
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU

Any event leading to discontinuation of study participation and temporary or permanent physical damage due to the treatment under investigation (Local skin irritations (contact dermatitis and folliculitis), sensory deficit, stiffness, muscle atrophy). Use of not allowed painkillers is also an adverse event.

  • Yes / no
  • Total number of complications per patient and per group
up to 6 months FU
Tegner activity level
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Mean per group
up to 6 months FU
EuroQol (EQ5D)
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
The EuroQol (EQ5D) is a health related quality of life instrument that provides a single index of an individual's quality of life. It consists of 5 dimensions resulting in 243 possible health states.
up to 6 months FU
Costeffectiveness
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
Main objective of the economic evaluation is to assess the cost effectiveness and cost-utility of brace and tape therapy of acute lateral ankle ligament injury. The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective, implying that both direct health care and direct non-health care costs, as well as indirect costs will be used as economic indicators. Firstly, relevant categories of resource utilisation were identified. Secondly, the volume of each category was measured and multiplied by the resource costs.
up to 6 months FU
Compliance
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
How many full days did you not wear the (semi rigid / lace-up) brace? Tape compliance is always 100% (except in cases of complications / adverse events)
up to 6 months FU
FAOS
Time Frame: up to 6 months FU
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The result can be plotted as an outcome profile.
up to 6 months FU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric EJ Raven, MD, Gelre Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Grade II and III Acute Lateral Ankle Ligament Injuries

Clinical Trials on Tape

Subscribe