Transcranial Direct Stimulation in Chronic Pelvic Pain

April 22, 2020 updated by: Felipe Fregni, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Investigation and Treatment of Central Nervous System Dysfunction in Chronic Pelvic Pain.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in reducing pain in subjects with chronic pelvic pain. Our hypothesis is that tDCS will decrease pain significantly when compared to sham stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study encompasses two experiments: The first one involves patients with chronic pain, receiving 10 sessions of stimulation, active or sham (parallel design).

The second experiment involves involves healthy subjects, receiving active or sham tDCS over the primary motor cortex (crossover design).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Providing informed consent to participate in the study
  2. 18 to 64 years old
  3. Having symptoms of pelvic pain for more than 6 months with an average of 3 on a 0-10 VAS scale (for pelvic pain subjects only)
  4. No history of or current genitourinary tuberculosis as self reported
  5. No history of urethral cancer as self reported
  6. No history or current bladder malignancy, high grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ as self reported
  7. No occurrence of ovarian, vaginal or cervical cancer in the previous 3 years as self reported
  8. No current vaginal infection as self reported
  9. No active herpes in previous 3 months as self reported
  10. No antimicrobials for urinary tract infections in previous 3 months as self reported
  11. Never treated with cyclophosphamide as self reported
  12. No radiation cystitis as self reported
  13. No neurogenic bladder dysfunction (due to a spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida or diabetic cystopathy) as self reported
  14. Absence of bladder, ureteral or urethral calculi for previous 3 months as self reported
  15. No urethritis for previous 3 months as self reported
  16. No urethral dilatation, cystometrogram, bladder cystoscopy with full anesthesia or bladder biopsy in previous 3 months as self reported
  17. Must not be pregnant
  18. Eligible to MRI according to MRI screening checklist
  19. No contraindications to tDCS:
  20. No history of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months as self reported
  21. No use of carbamazepine as self reported
  22. Does not have severe depression (with a score of >30 in the Beck Depression Inventory)
  23. No history of neurological disorders as self reported
  24. No history of unexplained fainting spells as self reported,
  25. No history of head injury resulting in more than a momentary loss of consciousness as self reported
  26. Have had no neurosurgery as self reported
  27. No history of psychological disorders as self reported
  28. Must have the ability to feel pain as self reported

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Active tDCS - pelvic pain patients
ACTIVE tDCS: Subjects will receive a total of 10 consecutive sessions of active tDCS over a two-week period (administered Monday - Friday). During each session, the anode electrode will be placed over the primary motor cortex of the predominantly painful side.
Chronic pain subjects will be randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation for the duration of the trial. The subject will receive 10 consecutive sessions at an intensity of 2mA with each session lasting 20 minutes. If the subject receives active stimulation the current will be applied for the full 20 minutes, while in the sham group current will only be applied for 30 seconds. In the healthy cohort, subjects will receive one session of active stimulation and one session of sham stimulation. The parameters will be the same as the pain subjects, at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS, electrical stimulation
Experimental: Sham tDCS - pelvic pain patients
SHAM tDCS: Subjects will receive a total of 10 consecutive sessions of sham tDCS over a two-week period (administered Mon-Fri). During each session, the anode will be placed over the primary motor cortex of the predominantly painful side.
Chronic pain subjects will be randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation for the duration of the trial. The subject will receive 10 consecutive sessions at an intensity of 2mA with each session lasting 20 minutes. If the subject receives active stimulation the current will be applied for the full 20 minutes, while in the sham group current will only be applied for 30 seconds. In the healthy cohort, subjects will receive one session of active stimulation and one session of sham stimulation. The parameters will be the same as the pain subjects, at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS, electrical stimulation
Experimental: Active tDCS - healthy
The healthy controls will undergo one day of treatment with active tDCS. All participants will receive both active and sham stimulation in a randomized order.
Chronic pain subjects will be randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation for the duration of the trial. The subject will receive 10 consecutive sessions at an intensity of 2mA with each session lasting 20 minutes. If the subject receives active stimulation the current will be applied for the full 20 minutes, while in the sham group current will only be applied for 30 seconds. In the healthy cohort, subjects will receive one session of active stimulation and one session of sham stimulation. The parameters will be the same as the pain subjects, at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS, electrical stimulation
Experimental: Sham tDCS - healthy
The healthy controls will undergo one day of treatment with sham tDCS. All participants will receive both active and sham stimulation in a randomized order.
Chronic pain subjects will be randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation for the duration of the trial. The subject will receive 10 consecutive sessions at an intensity of 2mA with each session lasting 20 minutes. If the subject receives active stimulation the current will be applied for the full 20 minutes, while in the sham group current will only be applied for 30 seconds. In the healthy cohort, subjects will receive one session of active stimulation and one session of sham stimulation. The parameters will be the same as the pain subjects, at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS, electrical stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: baseline and at 2 weeks
We use the Visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure pain. The VAS is ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 reffering to no pain and 10 reffering the the worst possible pain. We used the difference between post treatment minus baseline to compare the two treatments (active versus sham tDCS).
baseline and at 2 weeks
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: baseline and at 2 weeks

Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain.

The change in pressure pain threshold (post minus pre intervention) is use for the analysis.

baseline and at 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The questionnaire on quality of life was performed at the end of the treatment session and compared between the two groups (active and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1). The QOLS has 16 items (total scores ranging from 16 to 112) the highest scores corresponding the best QOL.
2 weeks
Clinical Global Impression - CGI
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This scale measures illness severity and was performed on patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1). The scale was performed at end of the treatment and compared between the two groups (real and sham). The scale is divided in 3 sub-scales: Severity of illness (0-7), global improvement (0-7) and efficacy index (0-16), total scores ranging from 0 to 30. The highest scores corresponding to lowest clinical improvement.
2 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale - Anxiety.This Scale Measures Patients' Level of Anxiety on a Scale (0-no Anxiety to 10-worst Anxiety Ever). It Was Performed at the End of the Treatment and Compared Between the 2 Groups (Real and Sham) in Patients With Pelvic Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The scale was performed at the end of the treatment and compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1).
2 weeks
Mini Mental Scale - MMS
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This scale measures patients cognitive impairment. It was performed at the end of the treatment and compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1). It is a 30 points scale (total scores ranging from 0 to 30), the highest score corresponds to the highest cognitive status.
2 weeks
Beck Depression Inventory - BDI.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
BDI is a questionnaire used for detecting depression. It was performed at the end of the treatment and compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1). It is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory (scores ranging from 0 to 63 - 0 corresponds to no symptom of depression).
2 weeks
Patient Global Assessment - PGA
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This scale measures patient's assessment of general health. It was performed at the end of the treatment and compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp 1). The patient has to answer the question "how is your health overall" on a scale going from 0 to 10 (0 being the worst, 10 being the best).
2 weeks
Von Frey
Time Frame: baseline and at 2 weeks
This test is used to test subjects' sensitivity to a mechanical stimulus. It was performed before and and after the treatment and the difference (post minus pre) was compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1). A set of filaments, typically from 0.008 grams force up to 300 grams force, is applied on the patients' skin. The mechanical threshold is defined as the moment when the patient detects the stimulus.
baseline and at 2 weeks
Pain Pressure Threshold Test - PPT
Time Frame: baseline and at 2 weeks
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain.This test was applied before and after the treatment and the difference (post minus pre) was compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp 1).
baseline and at 2 weeks
Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls - DNIC.
Time Frame: baseline and at 2 weeks
DNIC occurs when response from a painful stimulus (pain pressure threshold - PPT) is inhibited by another noxious stimulus (cold water). The difference between baseline and post treatment was compared between the 2 groups (real and sham) in patients with pelvic pain (Exp. 1).
baseline and at 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2009-P-002048

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe