Pilot Study of a Computer-Based Intervention for Alcohol Misuse in the Emergency Department

October 31, 2018 updated by: Mandi Newton, University of Alberta
Alcohol misuse amongst youth is a significant clinical and public health problem. The Emergency Department (ED) is an important setting for the treatment of alcohol-related problems as it is often the first point of contact between youth, their families, and the healthcare system. This pilot study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of a computer-based intervention in the ED for youth with alcohol-related presentations. The investigators research team will: (1) evaluate the methodological and operational processes involved in study recruitment and intervention implementation, (2) determine recruitment and retention rates, and (3) obtain preliminary data on the difference in alcohol consumption at different time points. The clinical and health service implications of this research will be used to plan further investigations designed to improve the standard of ED care among youth aged 12 to 16 with alcohol-related presentations. This research will also help optimize the planning and development of a full-scale randomized controlled clinical trial of a computer-based intervention designed to reduce higher-risk alcohol consumption and alcohol-related health and social problems in this target population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
        • Stollery Children's Hospital Emergency Department
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8
        • IWK Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Study Inclusion Criteria:

  • Youth aged 12 to 17 years who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with an alcohol-related problem.
  • Medically stable

Alcohol involvement will be determined by youth self-report of drinking alcohol prior to event necessitating a visit to the ED and/or a positive Blood Alcohol Content (BAC).

Study Exclusion Criteria:

  • Youth who require hospital admission
  • Youth whose ED presentation is linked to drugs aside from alcohol
  • Youth who report other drug use within the last 24 hours prior to ED presentation
  • Youth who do not speak or understand English
  • Youth who are currently enrolled in a treatment program for alcohol use
  • Youth who are accompanied by a non-guardianship adult but are not considered Mature Minors
  • Youth who do not have the capacity to give informed consent as determined by their attending ED physician
  • Youth do not have regular access to their own telephone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer-based PAF
Standard medical care followed by computer-based personalized assessment feedback (PAF).
This intervention includes standard medical care followed by receipt of computer-based Personalized Assessment Feedback (PAF). PAF is a type of brief intervention that targets norm misperceptions, for example summarizing a person's drinking in comparison to the average male or female in the general population. Theoretically, such normative feedback corrects norm misperceptions and motivates drinkers to re-evaluate their consumption patterns.
Sham Comparator: Computer-based sham
Standard medical care followed by a computer-based sham.
This intervention includes standard medical care followed by receipt of a computer-based sham. The sham is similar in format and duration as the computer-based Personalized Assessment Feedback but will engage youth in nutrition and exercise-related questions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Youth Alcohol Use
Time Frame: baseline, 1 and 3 months post-intervention
AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption subscale): 1 item regarding frequency of alcohol consumption, 1 item regarding the amount of alcohol consumption, and 1 item regarding the frequency of binge drinking. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores reflecting more consumption. The change in alcohol use report below reflects the change in AUDIT-C scores with negative values indicating a reduction in score and positive values indicating an increase in score.
baseline, 1 and 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: 18 months
To be calculated following active recruitment (18 months from study start date of patient enrolment). The recruitment rate relates to recruitment into the study, and not recruitment per arm as randomization and allocation occurred after enrolment.
18 months
Retention Rates
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-intervention
1 and 3 months post-intervention
Knowledge of Treatment Allocation
Time Frame: post-intervention (day 1)
post-intervention (day 1)
PAF Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: youth: post-intervention (day 1)
The acceptability of the Personalized Assessment Feedback (PAF) intervention will be assessed by youth post-intervention (only youth allocated to the PAF intervention). Measure assessed acceptability (satisfaction with the intervention, perceptions of the helpfulness, credibility of the personalized assessment feedback) and feasibility (time to completion, user friendliness).
youth: post-intervention (day 1)
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: Baseline
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services. We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
Baseline
Receptivity to Receiving Services: Seeking Help/Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents were asked two additional questions on receptivity to receiving services. The data below reflects the first question: On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is it's definitely a bad idea and 5 it's definitely a good idea, do you think that if someone you knew had an alcohol use problem they should get help or seek treatment?
Baseline
Perceived Barriers to Services
Time Frame: Baseline
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents answered 8 additional questions on perceived barriers to services: 1) Do you have any feelings such as dislike, distrust or fear about talking with doctors, counselors or other professionals? 2) Do you have any feelings about what other people would think if you sought help? 3) Do you find there is a lack of information that affected health services sought? 4) Do you have any concerns about the amount of time it takes to get help? 5) Were the health services you sought just not readily available? 6) Did you feel you just didn't want to talk to anyone about such a sensitive problem? 7) Was there a problem with registration, setting up appointments or contacting professionals? 8) Was there a problem getting to where treatment was available?
Baseline
Receptivity to Services: Doctors/Counselors Can Help
Time Frame: Baseline
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents were asked two additional questions on receptivity to receiving services. The data below reflects the second question: On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is it's definitely cannot help and 5 it definitely can help, do you think that doctors or counselors can help with alcohol use problems in general?
Baseline
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: 1-month post-intervention
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services. We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
1-month post-intervention
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: 3-months post-intervention
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services. We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
3-months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amanda Newton, PhD, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn Dong, MD, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe