- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01146665
Pilot Study of a Computer-Based Intervention for Alcohol Misuse in the Emergency Department
October 31, 2018 updated by: Mandi Newton, University of Alberta
Alcohol misuse amongst youth is a significant clinical and public health problem.
The Emergency Department (ED) is an important setting for the treatment of alcohol-related problems as it is often the first point of contact between youth, their families, and the healthcare system.
This pilot study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of a computer-based intervention in the ED for youth with alcohol-related presentations.
The investigators research team will: (1) evaluate the methodological and operational processes involved in study recruitment and intervention implementation, (2) determine recruitment and retention rates, and (3) obtain preliminary data on the difference in alcohol consumption at different time points.
The clinical and health service implications of this research will be used to plan further investigations designed to improve the standard of ED care among youth aged 12 to 16 with alcohol-related presentations.
This research will also help optimize the planning and development of a full-scale randomized controlled clinical trial of a computer-based intervention designed to reduce higher-risk alcohol consumption and alcohol-related health and social problems in this target population.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
- Stollery Children's Hospital Emergency Department
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8
- IWK Health Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Study Inclusion Criteria:
- Youth aged 12 to 17 years who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with an alcohol-related problem.
- Medically stable
Alcohol involvement will be determined by youth self-report of drinking alcohol prior to event necessitating a visit to the ED and/or a positive Blood Alcohol Content (BAC).
Study Exclusion Criteria:
- Youth who require hospital admission
- Youth whose ED presentation is linked to drugs aside from alcohol
- Youth who report other drug use within the last 24 hours prior to ED presentation
- Youth who do not speak or understand English
- Youth who are currently enrolled in a treatment program for alcohol use
- Youth who are accompanied by a non-guardianship adult but are not considered Mature Minors
- Youth who do not have the capacity to give informed consent as determined by their attending ED physician
- Youth do not have regular access to their own telephone
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Computer-based PAF
Standard medical care followed by computer-based personalized assessment feedback (PAF).
|
This intervention includes standard medical care followed by receipt of computer-based Personalized Assessment Feedback (PAF).
PAF is a type of brief intervention that targets norm misperceptions, for example summarizing a person's drinking in comparison to the average male or female in the general population.
Theoretically, such normative feedback corrects norm misperceptions and motivates drinkers to re-evaluate their consumption patterns.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Computer-based sham
Standard medical care followed by a computer-based sham.
|
This intervention includes standard medical care followed by receipt of a computer-based sham.
The sham is similar in format and duration as the computer-based Personalized Assessment Feedback but will engage youth in nutrition and exercise-related questions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Youth Alcohol Use
Time Frame: baseline, 1 and 3 months post-intervention
|
AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption subscale): 1 item regarding frequency of alcohol consumption, 1 item regarding the amount of alcohol consumption, and 1 item regarding the frequency of binge drinking.
Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores reflecting more consumption.
The change in alcohol use report below reflects the change in AUDIT-C scores with negative values indicating a reduction in score and positive values indicating an increase in score.
|
baseline, 1 and 3 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: 18 months
|
To be calculated following active recruitment (18 months from study start date of patient enrolment).
The recruitment rate relates to recruitment into the study, and not recruitment per arm as randomization and allocation occurred after enrolment.
|
18 months
|
|
Retention Rates
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-intervention
|
1 and 3 months post-intervention
|
|
|
Knowledge of Treatment Allocation
Time Frame: post-intervention (day 1)
|
post-intervention (day 1)
|
|
|
PAF Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: youth: post-intervention (day 1)
|
The acceptability of the Personalized Assessment Feedback (PAF) intervention will be assessed by youth post-intervention (only youth allocated to the PAF intervention).
Measure assessed acceptability (satisfaction with the intervention, perceptions of the helpfulness, credibility of the personalized assessment feedback) and feasibility (time to completion, user friendliness).
|
youth: post-intervention (day 1)
|
|
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services.
We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
|
Baseline
|
|
Receptivity to Receiving Services: Seeking Help/Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
|
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents were asked two additional questions on receptivity to receiving services.
The data below reflects the first question: On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is it's definitely a bad idea and 5 it's definitely a good idea, do you think that if someone you knew had an alcohol use problem they should get help or seek treatment?
|
Baseline
|
|
Perceived Barriers to Services
Time Frame: Baseline
|
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents answered 8 additional questions on perceived barriers to services: 1) Do you have any feelings such as dislike, distrust or fear about talking with doctors, counselors or other professionals?
2) Do you have any feelings about what other people would think if you sought help?
3) Do you find there is a lack of information that affected health services sought?
4) Do you have any concerns about the amount of time it takes to get help?
5) Were the health services you sought just not readily available?
6) Did you feel you just didn't want to talk to anyone about such a sensitive problem?
7) Was there a problem with registration, setting up appointments or contacting professionals?
8) Was there a problem getting to where treatment was available?
|
Baseline
|
|
Receptivity to Services: Doctors/Counselors Can Help
Time Frame: Baseline
|
As part of CASA measure (secondary outcome measure to measure health and social services utilization) adolescents were asked two additional questions on receptivity to receiving services.
The data below reflects the second question: On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is it's definitely cannot help and 5 it definitely can help, do you think that doctors or counselors can help with alcohol use problems in general?
|
Baseline
|
|
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: 1-month post-intervention
|
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services.
We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
|
1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Health Care System Utilization by Youth
Time Frame: 3-months post-intervention
|
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the use of community- and hospital-based health and social services.
We focused each question so that we collected service use for an alcohol use problem.
|
3-months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amanda Newton, PhD, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
- Principal Investigator: Kathryn Dong, MD, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 16, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
June 17, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 29, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2018
Last Verified
October 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00011650
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.