Azacitidine and Entinostat in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Been Removed By Surgery

January 14, 2019 updated by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Randomized Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Combined Epigenetic Therapy With 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat in Resected Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Versus Standard Care

This study combines the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-azacitidine (5-AZA), with an orally bioavailable histone deacetylase inhibitor, entinostat (SNDX-275), for the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the effect of 5-azacitidine and entinostat on the hazard of 3 year progression-free survival in patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the safety, tolerability and toxicity of entinostat and 5-azacitidine in patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

II. To explore the effect of entinostat and 5-azacitidine on median disease-free and overall survival in patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

III. To assess the pharmacodynamic effects of 5-azacitidine and entinostat on DNA methylation and gene re-expression in patients with resected stage I NSCLC through analysis of sputum.

IV. To estimate the effect of entinostat and 5-azacitidine on progression free survival comparing patients with N2 lymph nodes categorized as methylated pre-treatment with those who are categorized as unmethylated.

V. To establish factors that predict clinical outcome in patients treated with combination epigenetic therapy by performing genome-wide analyses on pre-treatment tumor DNA.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive azacitidine subcutaneously (SC) on days 1-5 and 8-10 and entinostat orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 3 and 10. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM II: Patients receive standard of care.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Moffitt Cancer Center
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, United States, 21401
        • Anne Arundel Medical Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21204
        • Greater Baltimore Medical Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be status post complete (R0) surgical resection of pathologically-proven NSCLC (stage IA-IB according to AJCC version 7)
  • Patients must be at least 4 weeks out from completion of surgery
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,000/mcL
  • Platelets >= 100,000/mcL
  • Total bilirubin =< 1.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) =< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • Creatinine =< 1.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • The effects of entinostat and 5-azacitidine on the developing human fetus at the recommended therapeutic dose are unknown; for this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be within 8 weeks of completing surgery
  • Patients who have received prior chemotherapy or radiation for treatment of their current diagnosis of lung cancer
  • Patients with sub-lobar resections (ie: wedge resection or segmentectomy)
  • Patients without mediastinal lymph node specimens from mediastinoscopy or surgery (at least level R4 or 7 for right sided tumors OR at least level 5, 6 or 7 for left sided tumors)
  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to entinostat, 5-azacitidine or other agents used in the study
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because entinostat and 5-azacitidine are agents with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects; because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with entinostat or 5-azacitidine, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated on this protocol; these potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with entinostat or 5-azacitidine; in addition, these patients are at increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (azacitidine, entinostat)
Patients receive azacitidine SC on days 1-5 and 8-10 and entinostat PO QD on days 3 and 10. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Correlative studies
Given PO
Other Names:
  • HDAC inhibitor SNDX-275
  • MS 27-275
  • MS-275
  • SNDX-275
Given SC
Other Names:
  • 5 AZC
  • 5-AC
  • 5-Azacytidine
  • 5-AZC
  • Azacytidine
  • Azacytidine, 5-
  • Ladakamycin
  • Mylosar
  • U-18496
  • Vidaza
No Intervention: Arm II (standard of care)
Patients receive standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The DFS hazard rate and 95% confidence interval will be reported. At this time, event time distributions for disease-free survival in the two arms will be estimated with the method of Kaplan and Meier and compared using a stratified Cox-proportional hazards model (stratified for stage IA vs IB) with a two-sided alpha of 10%.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factors That Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated With Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Terms of Epigenomic Data Generated From the Illumina Platform
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
The study was terminated early due to poor accrual since the requirement of clinic administration of the 5AZA daily and post-operative patients not wanting 6 months of treatment. For this reason, 13 pts were enrolled and data was not analyzed, for which we are unable to make any conclusions or report results.
Up to 2 years
Median Disease-free Survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Determined by the method determined by Kaplan and Meier. Estimated with 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazard modeling will be used for multivariate analysis.
Up to 5 years
Number of Relapses and Deaths Per Total Time of Follow-up Comparing Patients With N2 Lymph Nodes in Terms of Methylated and Unmethylated
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Kaplan Meier curves will be used.
Up to 5 years
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Determined by the method determined by Kaplan and Meier. Estimated with 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazard modeling will be used for multivariate analysis.
Up to 5 years
Presence of Methylation Patterns
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
McNemar's test will be used to compare the change in methylation after treatment in sputum.
Up to 2 years
Toxicities Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Simple descriptive statistics will be utilized to display the data.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles Rudin, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NCI-2012-02901 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • P30CA006973 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NA_00038631
  • J1037 (Other Identifier: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital)
  • 8311 (Other Identifier: CTEP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe