A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following 4 Cycles of Platinum-based Chemotherapy Without Disease Progression

March 24, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Multi-centre, Open-label, Phase IV, Interventional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) Following 4 Cycles of Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Experienced Disease Progression or Unacceptable Toxicity During Chemotherapy

This open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tarceva (erlotinib) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who have completed 4 cycles of standard platinum-based chemotherapy without progression. Patients will receive Tarceva at a dose of 150 mg orally daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangalore, India, 560027
      • Chennai, India, 600035
      • Delhi, India, 110085
      • Hyderabad, India, 500 034
      • Jaipur, India, 302 017
      • Kolkata, India, 700026
      • Nasik, India, 422005

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Histologically documented non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • Locally advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) disease.
  • Completion of 4 cycles of an acceptable, standard, platinum-based chemotherapy doublet without progression.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1.
  • Patients of reproductive potential must agree to use effective contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) axis (eg, gefitinib, cetuximab, trastuzumab).
  • Prior treatment with any monoclonal antibody therapy.
  • Any other malignancies within the previous 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous cell skin cancer.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, or metabolic disease or active infection
  • Pre-existing interstitial lung disease.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once a day for 48 weeks.
Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.
Other Names:
  • Tarceva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at Week 52
Time Frame: From the date of enrolment in the study until the date of disease progression or death from any cause (up to 2 years, 6 months).
A participant had progression-free survival if they did not have disease progression and were alive. Tumor assessments were done by magnetic resonance imaging according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter.
From the date of enrolment in the study until the date of disease progression or death from any cause (up to 2 years, 6 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
PFS was defined as the time from the date of enrolment to the date of disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurred first. Tumor assessments were done by magnetic resonance imaging according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (TL), taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as TLs at Baseline. TLs should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter.
From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of enrolment to the date of death from any cause.
From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR)
Time Frame: From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-target lesions. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter. Tumor assessments were done by magnetic resonance imaging according to RECIST v1.1.
From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Time Frame: From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).
A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD. Tumor assessments were done by magnetic resonance imaging according to RECIST v1.1.
From the date of enrolment until the end of the study (up to 2 years, 6 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Erlotinib

Subscribe