S9031-S9333-S0112-S0301-A Biomarkers Associated With Response to Cytarabine in Samples From Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

March 5, 2015 updated by: Southwest Oncology Group

Proteomic Signature Associated With Clinical Response to Cytarabine Based Induction Therapy in Patients With AML 56 Years and Older

RATIONALE: Studying samples of blood and tissue from patients with cancer treated with cytarabine in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about the effects of cytarabine on cells. It may also help doctors understand how well patients respond to treatment.

PURPOSE: This research trial studies biomarkers associated with response to cytarabine in samples from older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Refinement and testing of a multiparameter flow cytometry-based cell-signaling signature (FC classifier) associated with in vivo likelihood of complete response (CR) to cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy in elderly patients (56 years and older) newly diagnosed with non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
  • Identification of cell-signaling signature(s) associated with continuous CR to cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy at one year (CCR1) in adult patients 56 years and older with a newly diagnosed non-M3 AML.
  • Identification of cell-signaling signature(s) associated with relapse-free survival at one year (RFS1) in adult patients 56 years and older with a newly diagnosed non-M3 AML who received cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy and achieved CR.
  • To investigate changes in cell-signaling signature(s) between matched pre- and post-treatment specimens of relapsed/refractory patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Cryopreserved specimens are incubated with cytokines (e.g., interleukins), growth factors (e.g., sargramostim or filgrastim), and chemotherapeutic agent (e.g., cytarabine, etoposide) and other modulators. Cells are then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with antibodies that recognize extracellular markers (for example, surface phenotypic markers such as clusters of differentiation, drug transporters, and receptors) in conjunction with intracellular activation-state-specific epitopes of designated signaling molecules. Subsequently, cell are analyzed by phospho-flow cytometry (FC) in a random manner (without knowledge of clinical variables and outcomes) to a training set (complete pre-specified FC) versus a testing set. Cells are also analyzed by proteomic assays. Results are then compared with individual patient scores, including predicted clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

290

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients enrolled on S9031, S9333, S0112 or S0301 consenting to use of specimens for future research

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Newly diagnosed with non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
  • Pretreatment and relapse/refractory cryopreserved marrow and circulating mononuclear cells (MC) from patients who meet the following criteria:

    • Eligible and evaluable patients on study SWOG-9031, SWOG-9333 (Ara-C/DNR induction arm only), SWOG-S0112, or SWOG-S0301
    • Did not refuse consent for this use of specimens
    • Have 2+ vials of pretreatment marrow cells and/or 2+ vials of pretreatment peripheral blood cells in the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) AML/MDS Repository

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • See Disease Characteristics

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Response to induction chemotherapy: complete response (CR) vs non-complete response (NR)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete continuous response at one year (CCR1)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Relapse-free survival at one year (RFS1)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jerry Radich, MD, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia

Clinical Trials on gene expression analysis

3
Subscribe