Long Term Evaluation of Activity Levels Post Pulmonary Rehabilitation

February 9, 2012 updated by: Professor Richard Costello, Beaumont Hospital

Long Term Evaluation of Activity Levels Post Pulmonary Rehabilitation: 1 Year Follow-up

Sustained improvement after pulmonary rehabilitation in activity levels as measured by an activity armband.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is utilized to improve exercise capacity, quality of life and prognosis for patients who suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There is also strong evidence that supports the use of pulmonary rehabilitation to decrease hospital admissions thereby reducing cost of care. Recent studies suggest that the significant benefits achieved through rehabilitation fade with time and that in order to improve activities of daily living; for example, average daily number of steps, programmes of longer duration are required.

The primary aim of this study is to identify objective sustained improved in activity levels using the SenseWear activity armband after a short-term pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Secondary aims are to determine antibiotic and steroid use pre and post rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation and by both systemic and airway inflammation. Together these features lead to decreased physical activity which in turn worsens the patient's dyspnoea. In patients with COPD, physical activity levels are low compared to healthy controls and indeed lower than in patients with other chronic conditions such as arthritis and diabetes. For patients with COPD, decreased physical activity and breathlessness are significant predictors of mortality and morbidity. By reversing deconditioning pulmonary rehabilitation using supervised and home exercise programs leads to increased exercise capacity and health quality of life scores. In order for the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation to be sustained in the long-term it is essential that there is a change in the patient's physical activity in their home life. While practice guidelines recommend that there is transference of exercise to the home setting it is unknown if this happens in reality. Addressing whether there is an increase in physical activity at home after pulmonary rehabilitation is the focus of this study.

Physical activity can be measured in a number of ways, including direct observation, patient diaries and questionnaires, but one of the most successful are the performance based motion sensors such as pedometers and accelerometers. One such performance based motion sensor is the SenseWear accelerometer. The SenseWear has previously been used in patients with COPD, has been shown to be a reliable measure of physical activity performed in this population, other than those using rolators and it is objectively more accurate than questionnaires and diaries. The hypothesis of this study was that pulmonary rehabilitation leads to a sustained improvement in physical activity in patients with COPD. Physical activity was measured by the daily averaged activity recorded with a SenseWear armband at several time points in the year after a course of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dublin
      • Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland, 9
        • Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of COPD based on the GOLD staging of the disease
  • Referred to pulmonary rehabilitation by a respiratory consultant or member of the COPD Team
  • Modified Medical Research Council Score of 3 or above
  • Ability to mobilize independently
  • Motivated to exercise independently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No evidence of COPD on spirometry
  • Acute exacerbation within the last 4-6 weeks
  • Evidence of ischemic heart disease/acute changes on ECG
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Inability to exercise independently or musculoskeletal/neurological conditions which would prevent completion of the course
  • Lung cancer previous attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients are randomized to the control group and are assessed pre rehabilitation and post rehabilitation after which they proceed to the intervention group.
Experimental: Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Patients undergo an active seven week pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Assessments occur pre rehabilitation, post rehabilitation, at three months and at one year.
Patients undergo pulmonary rehabilitation for two hours twice a week for seven weeks. The first hour comprises of an individualized exercise programme and the second hour consists of an educational component. Patients are also required to undergo inspiratory muscle training five days a week for thirty minutes and exercise for an additional three days a week for thirty minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained improvement in free-living activities, measured as the average daily METs
Time Frame: At the end of 1 year compared to baseline
Using an accelerometer, which will be worn by patients for seven consecutive days at each time frame, daily average measurements of the number of steps per day, total energy expenditure and METs that will be broken down into sedentary, moderate and vigorous, plus sleep time and efficiency.
At the end of 1 year compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
Two quality of life questionnaires will be utilized, 1) the St. Georges Disease Questionnaire; a disease specific questionnaire, 2)The generic EuroQol questionnaire
baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test
Time Frame: baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
This is a validated field exercise test used to prescribe exercise intensity and determine functional capacity
baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
The Modified Medical Research Council Scale
Time Frame: baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
This questionnaire measures breathlessness on activity
baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
Pulmonary Function Tests
Time Frame: baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
Measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, Forced Vital Capacity, Inspiratory Capacity and peak inspiratory muscle pressure will all be measured
baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
Borg Score
Time Frame: baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up
A 10 point scale measurement of breathlessness
baseline will be compared to that at 1 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Richard W Costello, Professor, Beaumont Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Brenda M Deering, MSc Physio, Beaumont Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Claire Egan, MSc Physio, Beaumont Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Niamh M McCormack, MSc Nursing, Beaumont Hosptial

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Subscribe