Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Incentives on Physical Activity Behavior in a Health Insured Population (PAIS)

July 25, 2012 updated by: Estelle Victoria Lambert, University of Cape Town

A Prospective, Randomized, Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Types of Incentives in Increasing Physical Activity Behaviour on the Vitality Health Promotion Programme

Background: Physical inactivity and increased sedentary activity are major lifestyle factors that contribute to increasing burden of disease globally. There is evidence that the rise in prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) was largely responsible for growth in private insurance spending between 1987 and 2002 in the USA. There is renewed interest by health plans to implement incentivized health promotion programs, in an effort to change health behavior and thereby reduce health care costs related to NCDs. However, the literature on the role of incentives and rewards in influencing physical activity behavior, specifically, is relatively sparse, and the field of behavioral economics applied to health behavior is relatively new.

Most studies that have been conducted typically report findings with limited, well-defined incentives that are offered for a short period. These studies generally have shown a moderation in health care costs compared to non-participants. In a cross-sectional study of approximately 940,000 members of a national private health insurance, Discovery Health, the investigators have previously demonstrated a significant and inverse relationship between levels of participation in fitness-related activities and medical claims associated with hospital admissions. More recently, in a retrospective, longitudinal analysis over 5 yrs, amongst more than 300,000 members, the investigators found that participation in fitness-related activities increased over a 5-yr period and was associated with a significantly lower probability of hospital admissions and inpatient claims costs.

Aim: The current study primarily aims to prospectively compare the effectiveness of diverse incentives on physical activity behavior, monthly over a 12 month period following registration, in a cohort of newly-enrolled, adult members of the Vitality health promotion program.

Study sample and random allocation to groups: Newly enrolled adult members of the Discovery Health medical plan and who have, themselves, prospectively registered for the Vitality health promotion program, will be eligible for the study, and will be invited to participate by Discovery Health. This recruitment, enrollment and random allocation to groups will be initiated via a web-based email communication, from Discovery Health, over a period of 5 months. A final sample of 9000 adult members will be randomly allocated by Discovery Vitality (with replacement) to one of six study (incentive) groups (n=1500 per group) and followed each month for a period of 12 months.

The intervention arms include a Control group, in which members will be offered no additional incentives, other than the existing incentives, to engage in all points-earning physical activity. There will also be a Communication Group, in which members will be offered the base program and, in addition, will be sent bi-weekly communications by alternating email and text messaging which included information on the importance of physical activity, tips on accumulating "fitness points" on the base program, a status update of points earned and information on benefits and rewards offered.

The incentive arms are comprised of a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. In each case, members will be offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals will be offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment will be over a period of 5 months, and the intervention will take place over a period of 12 months, following registration, with a monthly pay-out for the incentive arms of the trial.

The following outcomes of interest will be measured:

  • Number of new participants (registration) in the fitness programs of Vitality
  • Points earned, as a proxy for levels of participation, for engaging in physical activity (gym visits)
  • Self-reported measures of physical activity levels, smoking and healthy eating behaviors
  • Health care claims (de-personalized) for the 12 month period following the 12 months intervention
  • Survey of attitudes to incentives and rewards in the post-study questionnaire

Ethical considerations: Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Cape Town/ University of Pennsylvania Research Ethics committees. Consent will be obtained from each subject, who agree to participate or 'opt out' and agree that their medical claims and utilization data may be examined in a de-personalised manner according to their group, and level of participation. Further, should a member choose to drop out in the course of the study, or refuse to participate, there will be no adverse impact on their medical plan coverage and they are free to withdraw without prejudice at any time during the course of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10907

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly enrolled adult members of the Discovery Health medical plan who voluntarily registered and paid a monthly subscription for the health promotion program (Vitality) were eligible for the study. The recruitment, enrollment and random allocation to intervention arms were initiated via a web-based email communication. Initially, an opt-in design was used but because of an exceedingly low enrollment rate in the first three months of the study (less than 10%), with permission from the governing IRB, an opt-out strategy was employed for the remaining 5 months of the recruitment window, resulting in an enrollment rate of 90% during this time period. Altogether, 12121 eligible persons were recruited electronically, 1046 had invalid email addresses, 163 opted out and there was no information concerning age for 5 subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Members who opted out. All members were voluntarily screened for participation in physical activity, and this is also done on site by participating gyms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitality Wellness program Direct Payment
In addition to the base program and supplementary communication, members of the Direct Payment group received a gift voucher, corresponding to their level of engagement. Members received payouts at the end of each month of registration, for 5 different levels of engagement. The payout for the lowest level of engagement corresponded to about 25% of the monthly subscription for the wellness program. The payout for the highest level of engagement was 3 times more than the monthly subscription for the wellness program. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

Experimental: Vitality Wellness Program Lottery Incentive
Members of the Lottery Incentive group were entered into a cash-prize draw at the end of each month following registration, if they achieved physical activity targets. The chance of winning was set at one in fifty with an expected value identical to the direct payment group. Four lottery payouts corresponding to the member's levels of engagement were made at the end of each month following registration. Enrollment took place over a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

Experimental: Vitality Wellness Program Charity Incentive
Members of the Charity Incentive Group were offered a selection of charities to which earned rewards could be donated. Nominated charities received the payouts at the end of each month of registration, for 5 different levels of engagement of the individual members. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

Experimental: Vitality Wellness Program Choice Incentive
Members of the Choice Incentive Group were asked to choose one of the three aforementioned incentive options on enrollment to the study. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

Other: Vitality Wellness Program Standard of Care
The Vitality Wellness program is the incentive-based wellness initiative of Discovery Health Medical Aid Scheme, a national private health insurer in South Africa. The standard program includes membership to three national gym chains, which is subsidized to 80% of the normal monthly subscription cost. Members have the opportunity to earn points by attending gyms, which contribute, together with points earned from engagement in other wellness and preventive activities, to tier status (Blue, Bronze, Silver, Gold and Diamond). Tier status allows members to receive increasing discounts on a range of goods and services from commercial partners. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

Active Comparator: Vitality Wellness Program Enhanced Communication
In this group, members were offered the base program and, in addition, were sent bi-weekly communications by alternating email and text messaging which included information on the importance of physical activity, tips on accumulating "fitness points" on the base program, a status update of points earned and information on benefits and rewards offered on the program. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

The incentive arms comprised a Direct Payment Group, a Charity Incentive Group, a Lottery Pay-out Group, and a Choice Group. Members were offered the base program and supplementary communication described above. In addition, individuals were offered the equivalent of one of four possible incentive amounts depending on the level of participation in fitness-related activities. Enrollment into the trial took place for a period of 5 months, and the intervention took place over a period of 12 months following registration.

Level 1: <150 fitness points per month - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month - no reward, up to Level 5, which was >3000 fitness points/month - equivalent to >20 gym visits/month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fitness points
Time Frame: Accrual of fitness points each month for a period of 12 months, following enrollment.
Members accrue 'fitness points' on the basis of documented gym attendance or participation other fitness-related activities. The levels of this variable are described below. • less than 150 fitness points - equivalent to < 1 gym visit per month, 150 to 749 fitness points - equivalent to 1-4 gym visits per month, 750 to 1499 fitness points - equivalent to between 5 and 9 gym visits per month, 1500 to 2999 fitness points - equivalent to between 10 and 19 gym visits per month and > 3000 fitness points - equivalent to 20 or more gym visits per month
Accrual of fitness points each month for a period of 12 months, following enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Estelle V Lambert, PhD, University of Cape Town

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC REF 061/2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wellness Programs

Clinical Trials on Financial incentives

3
Subscribe