Effectiveness of a Brain-Computer Interface Based System for Cognitive Enhancement in the Normal Elderly (3ECog)

July 24, 2014 updated by: Lee Tih Shih, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
The primary objective is to examine the efficacy of 8-weeks of a locally developed brain-computer interface based system (BrainpalTM)intervention for improving attention and memory in normal elderly. We hypothesize that elderly who have completed the training program will have significant improvement in their attention and memory compared to the controls, based on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The world population has reached an unprecedented seven billion, with global population ageing increasing at a greater rate than total population growth. Between 1998 and 2030, the proportion of persons aged 65 years and over in Singapore will grow by about 3% annually compared to 1.0-1.3% in some developed nations. Specific cognitive deficits like inattention, dysexecutive functioning, and processing speed decline may affect a number of quality of life domains. Concurrent with these statistics, the maintenance of the highest possible level of cognitive functioning for as long as possible has become an important goal of aging successfully.

To contribute to the realization of this goal we propose to conduct a wait-list control pilot trial to examine the efficacy and safety of BrainpalTM for cognitive enhancement in the normal elderly. BrainpalTM uses a technology which analyzes brain waves captured through an electroencephalogram to determine the participants' state of attention. The training program developed using this patented technology may be useful for individuals who experience difficulty with memory and sustaining their attention.

BrainpalTM may represent one alternative means to enhance cognitive abilities and to slow down cognitive decline in the normal elderly. If demonstrated to be efficacious, this therapy may even help to delay the onset of dementia.

In addition, the rate of cognitive decline during the course of AD is possibly influenced by not only environmental but also genetic factors. To date, several genes, such as apolipoprotein E (APOE) and TOMM40 (translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 homologue), have been identified to be probable genetic risk markers for AD. These genes have been shown to play a role in disease onset as well as rates of cognitive decline. For instance, studies have shown APOEε4 allele carriers to be associated with earlier and faster cognitive decline.

Therefore, we propose to analyse if there is any relationship between the genetic profiles of our participants and their performance in the BrainpalTM training program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169857
        • Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age range between 60-70 years old
  2. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5*
  3. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) of 9 and below
  4. Mini-Mental State Examination of 24 and above*
  5. Chinese ethnicity
  6. Literate in English and/or Chinese
  7. Able to travel to study site independently

    • In the case of conflicting CDR and MMSE scores, MMSE scores will supersede CDR scores.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any known neuropsychiatric disorders (such as epilepsy or mental retardation)
  2. Involvement in another research study (aside from SLAS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention
Subjects will undergo the BrainpalTM intervention for 24 sessions over the span of 8 weeks. Each session will take 30-minute to complete. The intervention group will undergo the BrainpalTM treatment in the first 8 weeks of the trial.
Brain-computer Interface (BCI) is a direct communication pathway between a human brain and an external device. It is a technology that enables people to interact with computers through their thoughts. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the best studied non-invasive interface facilitating such communication. The BCI system will take EEG recordings from the prefrontal cortex to determine the participants' state of attention with high specificity. The training program developed using this patented technology may be useful for individuals who experience difficulty with memory and sustaining their attention.
Other Names:
  • Brain-Computer Interface
No Intervention: Wait-List Control
The waitlist control will start their 8 week treatment after the completion of the intervention group from week 9 onwards. They will undergo the BCI intervention for 24 sessions over the span of 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Score on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
Time Frame: Comparison in the change of RBANS total score from baseline (Week 1) to post-treatment (Week 8) in Intervention Group versus Wait-List Control group
The Total Score on RBANS reflects the neurocognitive status of the participant by summing five index/domain scores. The domains are Immediate Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional, Language, Attention, and Delayed Memory.
Comparison in the change of RBANS total score from baseline (Week 1) to post-treatment (Week 8) in Intervention Group versus Wait-List Control group

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Adverse Events reported by participants on the Safety Measurement Form
Time Frame: The duration of 8 weeks of intensive BCI intervention sessions
The Safety Measurement Form will be completed at the start of every BCI intervention visit (except the first visit). It will collect information on any safety concerns and/or side effects experienced by the participant since their last BCI intervention visit.
The duration of 8 weeks of intensive BCI intervention sessions
Usability Measurement
Time Frame: Before a subject exits from the study, including completion of the protocol and withdraw of consent
The usability measurement collects feedback on the acceptability and usability of the BCI intervention program to improve user satisfaction in future trials.
Before a subject exits from the study, including completion of the protocol and withdraw of consent

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship between genetic profile of participants and their performance on the BrainpalTM training program
Time Frame: After the BrainpalTM training program is completed
Blood samples will be collected from each subject for DNA extraction. The samples will be used to generate a genetic profile for each subject. The presence or absence of genes of interest (i.e. TOMM40 and APOEε4)on a subject's genetic profile will then be associated with his or her corresponding performance on BCI, as measured by his or her RBANS scores.
After the BrainpalTM training program is completed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tih Shih Lee, MD, PhD, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Subscribe