Bariatric Surgery and HDL-cholesterol

October 15, 2012 updated by: Geltrude Mingrone, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Effect of Gastric Bypass Versus Diet on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Objective: to assess the effect of gastric bypass on HDL-cholesterol concentration and its Apolipoprotein A4 content at 1 year following bariatric surgery in comparison with a hypocaloric diet. Secondary aim was to measure total cholesterol and triglycerides levels as well as insulin sensitivity after interventions.

Summary Background Data: Very few prospective uncontrolled studies have investigated the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on cardiovascular risk factors. No controlled studies had as primary goal the changes in HDL-cholesterol after gastric bypass.

Methods: Forty subjects with a BMI>40 or ≥35 kg/m2 in the presence of diabetes were enrolled.

Twenty of them were operated of RYGB while 20 received lifestyle modification suggestions and medical therapy for obesity complications (diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design The study was an unblinded, prospective, non randomized clinical trial. Participants were recruited from referrals for treatment of morbid obesity between September 2008 and July 2009. One year follow-up was completed in September 2011.

The aim of the study related to the changes in HDL-cholesterol at 1 year after the intervention. Secondary aims were the changes in Apolipoprotein 4 (Apo4) and insulin sensitivity after the interventions.

Twenty morbidly-obese subjects (11 women and 9 men), whose 14 with normal glucose tolerance and 6 with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have been studied before and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after bariatric surgery.

Twenty morbidly-obese subjects (12 women and 8 men), 15 with normal glucose tolerance and 5 with T2DM, in the waiting list for bariatric surgery were enrolled in the protocol and underwent medical therapy for obesity complications (diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia) and lifestyle modification suggestions.

Participants were eligible for inclusion if they had a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or >35 kg/m2 in presence of type 2 diabetes, were aged 30 to 60 years, and had not sustained weight loss in the previous 1 year. Exclusion criteria were a history of major abdominal or bariatric surgery, disabling cardiac or pulmonary diseases, cancer, long-term treatment with oral corticosteroids, and mental illness.

Roux-&-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) involves the use of a surgical stapler to create a small and vertically oriented gastric pouch with a volume usually < 30 ml. The upper pouch is completely divided by the gastric remnant and is anastomosed to the jejunum, 75 cm distally to the Treitz's ligament , through a narrow gastrojejunal anastomosis in a Roux-en-Y fashion. Bowel continuity is restored by an entero-entero anastomosis, between the excluded biliary limb and the alimentary limb, performed at 150 cm from the gastrojejunostomy.

Lifestyle modifications A hypocaloric diet (15 kcal/kgbw containing 55% carbohydrates, 30% lipids and 15% proteins) was prescribed together with the indications to perform 30 minutes brisk walk each day. Patients had open access to a diabetologist every 3 months. Medical therapies, including pharmaceutical agents, were assigned on an individual basis.

Anthropometric measures Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a beam scale and height to the nearest 0.5 cm using a stadiometer (Holatin, Crosswell, Wales, U.K.).

Blood pressure Blood pressure was measured 3 times with an appropriately sized cuff after the participant had rested for 5 minutes, and the last 2 measurements were averaged.

Oral glucose tolerance test A standard 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed after an overnight fasting with blood sampling at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min. Samples were placed in chilled tubes, and plasma was separated within 20 min and stored at -80°C.

Analytical methods Blood was drawn in the morning after an overnight fast. The sera and plasma were immediately separated by centrifugation at 4°C and stored at -80°C until assay.

Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose-oxidase method (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Plasma insulin was assayed by microparticle-enzyme immunoassay (Abbott, Pasadena, CA) with a sensitivity of 1 μU/ml and an intra-assay CV of 6.6%.

Total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured enzymatically. HDL-cholesterol was measured after precipitating apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins with dextran sulfate and magnesium chloride.

HbA1c serum levels were measured by high-performance liquid-chromatography (normal range 3.5-6.5%) Apo A4 was assessed by ELISA (Cusabio Biotech, Wuhan, Hubei, China); the detection range is from 15.62 μg/l to 1000 μg/l and the minimum detectable concentration is 4 μg/l.

Insulin Sensitivity Models

The OGTT and fasting plasma glucose and insulin were used to compute the insulin sensitivity. Insulin resistance was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) originally described by Mathew et al. HOMA-IR was calculated using the following equation:

HOMA-IR(μU/ml∙mg/dl)=fasting insulin(μU/ml)∙(fasting glucose (mg/dl))/405 Peripheral insulin sensitivity was assessed by the Oral Glucose Insulin Sensitivity (OGIS) model. OGIS is an index of insulin sensitivity calculated in this case from the 3 hours OGTT and it is an estimate of the glucose clearance during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp expressed in ml/min per square meter of body surface area.

Statistics All of the data are expressed as means ± SD unless otherwise specified. The Wilcoxon paired-sample test was used for intragroup comparisons. Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. Nonparametric Spearman correlations were used to assess linear relationships between single variables.

We calculated that a total of 30 participants would give 80% power to detect a significant (P < 0.05) difference between the groups. To allow for possible dropouts and add power for analysis of secondary outcomes, we decided to enroll 40 participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy
        • Catholic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI =/> 35 kg/m2,
  • age 30-60 years,
  • both sexes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of major abdominal or bariatric surgery,
  • disabling cardiac or pulmonary diseases,
  • cancer,
  • long-term treatment with oral corticosteroids, and
  • mental illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Both sexes, age between 30 and 60 years, BMI =/> 35 kg/m2
Active Comparator: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Active Comparator: diet and lifestyle modifications
Both sexes, age between 30 and 60 years, BMI =/> 35 kg/m2
Active Comparator: diet and lifestyle modifications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
changes in HDL-cholesterol Baseline to 1 year HDL-cholesterol changes: baseline to 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
changes in Apolipoprotein 4 (Apo4) and insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Geltrude Mingrone, MD, Catholic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HDL-2008

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Morbid Obesity

Clinical Trials on Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Subscribe