Vitamin A Supplementation at Birth and Atopy in Childhood

November 14, 2013 updated by: Bandim Health Project

The Effect of Vitamin A Supplementation at Birth on the Development of Atopy in Childhood: Long-term Follow-up of a Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION Eight trials studying the effect of providing neonatal vitamin A supplementation (NVAS) have been reported, and another four are underway to test whether NVAS should become WHO policy. Three of the four African trials were conducted by the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea-Bissau. One of them was a two-by-two factorial trial among low-birth-weight children. From 2004-2008, the children were randomly allocated to 25,000 IU vitamin A or placebo at birth, and furthermore to BCG vaccination at birth or later as is local policy. In 2011, the investigators conducted a follow-up study. A remarkably strong harmful effect of NVAS on atopy and wheezing was found (manuscript under review).

Seen in the context that NVAS may soon become a WHO policy it is obviously worrying if NVAS is associated with a higher risk of atopy and wheezing. The investigators therefore aim to conduct a similar follow-up study of participants in the first NVAS trial conducted in Guinea-Bissau from 2002-2004, among normal-birth-weight infants, to test whether NVAS is associated with an increased risk of atopy and wheezing and other allergic symptoms as well as growth.

METHODS

Study population:

From 2002-2004 BHP conducted a randomised trial of NVAS. The investigators recruited newborns when they came for BCG vaccination. Provided parental consent, they received an oral supplement of 50,000 IU vitamin A or placebo.

Study design:

This study will be a follow-up study of the cohort of children randomised to NVAS (intervention) or placebo (current policy) together with BCG vaccine at birth.

Other exposures:

The investigators will also investigate the effect of receiving an additional dose of measles vaccine and the timing of DTP vaccine on the development of atopy.

Assessment of outcomes:

The investigators will visit all children at the last known address. Height, weight and mid upper arm circumference will be measured. BCG scar will be examined and vaccination card details recorded by the field assistant. Children will be excluded from skin prick testing (SPT) if they have a history suggestive of anaphylaxis or are currently using anti-histamine medication. SPT will be performed using aero-allergens, food allergens and positive histamine and negative saline control. The mother or guardian will be interviewed by a local assistant. Symptoms of eczema and asthma as well as food allergy will be assessed.

Statistical analysis:

Effect of randomisation group and other factors on outcomes will be analysed in multivariable regression models. All analyses will be adjusted for skin prick tester. All analyses will be conducted stratified by sex.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bissau Codex
      • Bissau, Bissau Codex, Guinea-Bissau, 1004
        • Bandim Health Project

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants in a previous neonatal vitamin A supplementation trial

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled at birth in NCT00168610

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with history suggestive of anaphylaxis will be excluded from skin prick testing but included in the study population

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Atopic sensitisation
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Skin prick test positivity. A wheal >=3mm will be considered positive.
Single observation on day of recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms of asthma
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Questionnaire based on ISAAC survey for 6-7 year olds
Single observation on day of recruitment
Symptoms of eczema
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Questionnaire based on ISAAC survey for 6-7 year olds
Single observation on day of recruitment
Symptoms of food allergy
Time Frame: Single observation of day of recruitment
Questionnaire based on Health Nuts survey
Single observation of day of recruitment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Single observation on day of recruitment
Height
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Single observation on day of recruitment
Mid-upper arm circumference
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Single observation on day of recruitment
Hospitalisations
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
Single observation on day of recruitment
Infectious diseases
Time Frame: Single observation on day of recruitment
History of chickenpox or measles
Single observation on day of recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine Benn, DMSc, Statens Serum Institut

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe