- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01857882
Decision Support Workshop for Breast Reconstruction (DSW)
Breast Reconstruction Decision Workshop Pilot RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
- Toronto General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age: 18 - 79 years at the time of consultation
- In situ or invasive biopsy confirmed breast adenocarcinoma
- Considered for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
- First consultation for breast reconstruction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Chest wall or atypical breast malignancy (ex: angiosarcoma) or inflammatory adenocarcinoma of the breast
- Completion any phase of reconstruction, or for revision reconstruction
- Patient cannot read or write in English.
- Cognitive impairment or uncontrolled psychiatric diagnosis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Decision Support Workshop
The decision support workshop will be 2 hours in duration on the morning of the consultation and will be facilitated by a dedicated social worker from psycho-oncology.
|
Incorporates the key components of shared decision-making and decision support with the philosophy of delivering supportive care to cancer patients.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard Care
Routine pre-consultation education
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline decision self-efficacy at 1 week after surgical consultation
|
Decision self-efficacy (DSE) scale is a prospectively designed instrument to evaluate patient self-confidence in decision-making, including shared decision-making. It has been validated among women facing treatment decisions for osteoporosis and used in cancer patients. Psychometric evaluation has shown high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90). Decision self-efficacy is correlated with decision conflict subscales of feeling informed (r = 0.47) and supported (r = 0.45). This instrument has never been tested in the breast cancer or breast reconstruction population. The total score is calculated by summing the 11 items, dividing by 11 and multiplying by 25. Scores range from 0 (extremely low self-efficacy) to 100 (extremely high self-efficacy). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated at baseline and after the initial consultation. Change in score was defined as the difference in total score between baseline and after consultation. |
Change from baseline decision self-efficacy at 1 week after surgical consultation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline decision conflict at 1 week after surgical consultation
|
Decision conflict scale measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options and has been demonstrated to be valid and responsive to change.
The decisional conflict scale is a 16-item 5-response instrument that reports a score from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating more conflict (items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25).
|
Change from baseline decision conflict at 1 week after surgical consultation
|
|
Decision Preference and Decision Choice
Time Frame: baseline
|
Decision Preference and Decision Choice has been used as a primary and secondary outcome in studies of decision support interventions in cancer patients.
It demonstrates good test-retest reliability (test-retest coefficient > 0.90) and is sensitive to change when measured before and after an intervention.
|
baseline
|
|
Patient Involvement in Care Scale (PICS)
Time Frame: T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
|
PICS is a measure of patient perception of involvement with her care, and has seven 5-point Likert scale items that assess the extent to which the patient asked questions, offered opinions, and expressed concerns when meeting with the surgeon.
|
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
|
|
Satisfaction With Information (Sub-scale of BREAST-Q)
Time Frame: T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
|
The BREAST-Q is a procedure-specific and validated PRO that measures Hr-QOL and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.
The "Satisfaction with Information" Subscale specifically measures patient satisfaction with the preoperative information and care provided by the plastic surgeon and other members of the medical team.
There are 15 items that use a four-level Likert scale response format, the score is transformed on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
|
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
|
|
Qualitative Interview Assessment
Time Frame: Within three months after initial consultation
|
A subgroup of participants allocated to both the experimental and usual care groups will be asked to participate in a brief qualitative telephone interview.
Purposeful sampling will be used to recruit 5 patients from each group to achieve data saturation and variability.
Telephone interviews will be conducted by a social worker trained in qualitative methods.
All participants randomized to the workshop will additionally be asked to complete a written survey for evaluation of the intervention immediately after participation in the workshop.
|
Within three months after initial consultation
|
|
Uptake Rate of Breast Reconstruction-Service Outcome
Time Frame: Six months after initial consultation
|
The uptake rate of breast reconstruction (if patients chose breast reconstruction or no reconstruction)
|
Six months after initial consultation
|
|
Length of Consultation-service Outcome
Time Frame: Duration of initial consultation
|
The length of the initial consultation with the plastic surgeon, measured in minutes.
Consultations are expected to be between 20-60 mins.
|
Duration of initial consultation
|
|
Number of Consultations-service Outcomes
Time Frame: Six months after initial consultation
|
The number of consultations with the plastic surgeon until the patient has made a reconstruction choice (defined as signing a surgical consent form) will be recorded.
Patients can spend months considering their choices, so it is appropriate to follow them for a period of at least six months after their initial consultation.
|
Six months after initial consultation
|
|
Breast Reconstruction Knowledge Test
Time Frame: Change in baseline breast reconstruction knowledge at 1 week after initial consultation
|
This breast reconstruction knowledge test is a 12-item 3-response questionnaire that records the score on a continuous integer scale, and measured patient's knowledge regarding breast reconstruction.
|
Change in baseline breast reconstruction knowledge at 1 week after initial consultation
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Time Frame: baseline
|
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey has a series of 18 questions that measure 4 domains of social support (emotional, tangible, affectionate, and social interactions).
Responses range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all the time).
The items in each domain were summed and then transformed to yield scores ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate more support.
|
baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate-feasibility Outcome
Time Frame: Duration of recruiting, expected on average two months
|
As this is a pilot study, the feasibility of conducting the study is highly important.
The recruitment rate of participants will be measured, during the recruiting period which is expected to be on average two months.
|
Duration of recruiting, expected on average two months
|
|
Retention After Randomized Treatment Assignment (Workshop and Consultation Attendance)-Feasibility Outcome
Time Frame: Duration of treatment-8 hours on day of treatment
|
The number of participants who completed their assigned treatment (workshop and consultation vs. consultation alone) will be recorded.
This will be recorded directly after each day the treatment is delivered.
|
Duration of treatment-8 hours on day of treatment
|
|
Completion of Primary Outcome Measure-feasibility Outcome
Time Frame: 1 week after initial consultation
|
Patients are to complete the primary outcome one week after initial consultation.
However, it is expected that some patients may take longer to complete this intervention (on average 1 month after consultation), and will require reminder telephone calls.
|
1 week after initial consultation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Toni Zhong, MD, MHS, University Health Network, Toronto
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, Bagher S, Jones JM, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SO, O'Neill AC, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1365-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
- Platt J, Baxter N, Jones J, Metcalfe K, Causarano N, Hofer SO, O'Neill A, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 6;14:199. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-199.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11-1027-CE
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer
-
Northwestern UniversityEisai Inc.UnknownMale Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative...United States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer
-
Oncoliq US IncRecruitingBreast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Detection | Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3) | Breast Cancer With Low to Intermediate HER2 Expression | Breast Cancer - Female | Breast Cancer (Early Breast Cancer) | Breast Cancer - Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) | Breast Cancer - Infiltrating...Argentina
-
University of California, IrvineNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedBreast Cancer | HER2-positive Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast CancerUnited States
-
Joseph Baar, MD, PhDCompletedBreast Cancer | Stage I Breast Cancer | Inflammatory Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)CompletedCancer Survivor | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInflammatory Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreSyndax PharmaceuticalsTerminatedStage I Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Decision Support Workshop
-
Mahidol UniversityUniversity of Medical Technology, YangonCompletedCognitive ChangeMyanmar
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
University of OttawaCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleRegional Agency of Sante Nord Pas-de-Calais; OméDIT (Observatory of Medicines...CompletedAcute Renal Failure | Patient Acceptance of Health CareFrance
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaPharmig - Gesundheitsziele aus dem Rahmen-PharmavertragCompleted
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCanadian Frailty Network; The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical AssociationCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaGlaxoSmithKline; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Roche Pharma AG; AstraZeneca; Janssen... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University Psychiatric Clinics BaselCompletedCompassion | Critical Incident | Social Climate | Staff Support | Workplace WellbeingSwitzerland
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health services; University of Alberta; Covenant HealthCompletedStrategy for Uptake of Processes for Recognizing and Responding to Acute Kidney Injury (SUPPORT AKI)Acute Kidney InjuryCanada