- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02163798
Evaluation of Energy Expenditure and Cardiovascular Health Effects From Tai Chi and Walking Exercise
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
An influential medical report released in 1996 confirmed that daily accumulation of 30 minutes of moderate physical activity would significantly lower the risks of many chronic diseases (Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. 1996). The report also recommended walking as one of the best forms of exercise that suitable for both healthy and patient population in all ages. To meet the daily 30 minutes exercise guidelines, a popular health promotion campaign -- 10,000 steps of walking per day, has been widely implemented in western countries, and has been recently promoted by the Health Info-World of HK Hospital Authority. Some studies demonstrated various health benefits from regular walking. The most recent study by Murphy et al. (Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002) provided an excellent example that, in a 6-week walking program (5 days per week), one single bout of continuous 30 minutes of walking per day yielded similar health benefits as three 10-minute walks per day. The exercise intensity for both walking exercises was 70-80% of maximal heart rate, and resulted in significant increase in HDL-cholesterol, and decreases in triglycerides and total cholesterol. Both walking exercises improved body composition significantly. Moreover, tension/anxiety were also decreases significantly. Similar health benefits were also noted by several other studies (Moreau KL, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001. Wullink M et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001. O'Hara RB et al. ACSM's Health Fitness J 2000). In these studies, the walking intervention periods varied from 6 weeks to 24 weeks, and daily walking times varied from 20 minutes to 50 minutes. Exercise intensities varied from 50% to 70% of VO2max. However, the energy cost of a typical walking bout of HK adults is not clear. Since body composition of HK Chinese is different from those reported for westerners, it is reasonably believe that the energy expenditure of walking for HK Chinese is different from those found in the literature. The CVD benefits result from walking have not been reported for the Chinese population. These outcome measures derived from walking and Tai Chi have not been compared.
Tai Chi is an ancient form of Chinese fitness exercise. A number of studies have investigated the positive health improvement effects from Tai Chi for patients (Channer KS et al. Postgrad Med J 1996. Fontana JA et al. Nurs Clin North Am 2000. Lan C et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999), as well as for healthy individuals (Lan C et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998. Zhuo D et al. Can J Appl sport Sci 1984). These health benefits include an improvement of aerobic fitness (Lai JS et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995. Hong YL et al. Br J Sport Med 2000) and energy metabolism (Zhuo D et al. Can J Appl sport Sci 1984. Schneider D et al. Int J Sport Med 1991), muscular strength and balance (Hong YL et al. Br J Sport Med 2000. Chan WW et al. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2000. Schaller KJ et al. J Gerontol Nurs 1996), as well as mental control (Jin P. J Psycho-som Res 1992. Fasko Jr D et al. Clin Kinesiol 2001). Compared to walking, it is intuitively perceived that Tai Chi is characterized by lower exercise intensity and metabolic cost. But surprisingly, Lan et al. reported that the exercise intensity of a typical session of Tai Chi (24 minutes Yang style) exceeded 70% of maximal heart rate (Lan C et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996). However, the energy cost of this single bout of Tai Chi has not been investigated. Tai Chi and walking seem to provide similar benefits but has not been compared simultaneously except in one study. Jin reported that heart rate, blood pressure, and urinary catecholamine changes for Tai Chi were similar to walking at a speed of 6 km/h (Jin P. J Psycho-som Res 1992). However, the energy cost and CVD risk measures were not investigated in this study. Although both walking and Tai Chi are believe to have positive health benefits, the extents to which these exercises contribute to raising the energy metabolism as well as CV health improvement have not been documented. Which form of exercise would elicit higher energy demand and produce greater CV health effects? Currently no scientific data available to report such results for HK Chinese. Results from this study will be valuable for practitioners to provide quantifiable prescriptions for obese individuals for weight control, as well as for those who need to improve CV health.
AIMS
Increasing energy expenditure has been considered a crucial role for reducing obesity. Raising the level of energy expenditure has also been found to produce improvement in cardio-respiratory fitness and lowering CVD risks. However, the energy cost from Tai Chi and walking have not been fully studied and their training effects on CVD risks have not been compared. The purpose of the present study was to examine the level of energy expenditure of Tai Chi and walking, and to compare the training effects from Tai Chi and walking in terms of lowering CVD risks. Specific aims of the project were as follows:
- To evaluate the changes of energy expenditure, aerobic fitness, body composition, SF-12, blood serum lipid profiles (total, LDL, and HDL-cholesterols), fasting blood glucose, dietary habits and physical fitness after the 12 weeks of Tai Chi and walking training, respectively.
- to compare the effects of Tai Chi and walking exercises on improving energy expenditure, aerobic fitness, body composition, SF-12, blood serum lipid profiles (total, LDL, and HDL-cholesterols), fasting blood glucose, dietary habits and physical fitness after the 12 weeks of Tai Chi and walking training.
- compare the energy metabolism during these two exercises at similar practice intensity (approximately at 50-70% of age-predicted maximal heart rate, and 30 minutes of exercise bout).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- residents of large housing estates in the Shatin district
- physical inactivity
- no exercise habits
Exclusion Criteria:
- cardiovascular diseases
- pulmonary diseases
- neurological disorder
- musculoskeletal disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tai Chi Group
Participants in this group received a 12-week instructor-led Tai Chi training program.
|
A 12-week (45 min per day, 5 days per week) instructor-led Tai Chi training program was conducted in the Tai Chi group.
Of the 5 days of exercise, 3 days were led by qualified instructors, and 2 other days for self-practice.
Each session consisted of a 10-min standard warm-up, 30-min of Tai Chi exercise, and 5-min cool down stretching.
The modified 32 Yang-style Tai Chi Chuan was used, because it could be learned within a relatively short time, and has been widely promoted in HK community.
An exercise log was used to record the actual implementation of the training (instructor-led & self-practice).
|
Experimental: Walking Group
Participants in this group received a 12-week instructor-led brisk walking training program.
|
A 12-week (45 min per day, 5 days per week) instructor-led brisk walking training program was conducted in the walking group.
Of the 5 days of exercise, 3 days were led by qualified instructors, and 2 other days for self-practice.
Each session consisted of a 10-min standard warm-up, 30-min of walking exercise, and 5-min cool down stretching.
An exercise log was used to record the actual implementation of the training (instructor-led & self-practice).
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in the control group did not receive intervention during the 12 weeks, and were told that they would be provided two sessions of free health and fitness evaluation with an interval of three months (12 weeks).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes of aerobic fitness after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
The aerobic fitness, in terms of maximal oxygen intake (VO2max in ml/min/kg), was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention VO2max minus the post-intervention VO2max was the "Changes of aerobic fitness after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of resting VO2 (ml/min/kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Resting VO2 (ml/min/kg) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention REE-VO2 minus the post-intervention REE-VO2 was the "Changes of resting VO2 after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of body mass index (BMI) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
BMI was an indicator of body composition in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention BMI minus the post-intervention BMI was the "Changes of BMI after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of waist circumference (WC) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
WC was an indicator of body composition in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention WC minus the post-intervention WC was the "Changes of WC after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes of resting heart rate (HR in beats/min) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Resting heart rate (HR in beats/min) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention REE-HR minus the post-intervention REE-HR was the "Changes of resting HR after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of resting kilocalorie expenditure (KCal in KCal/min) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Resting KCal (KCal/min) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention REE-KCal minus the post-intervention REE-KCal was the "Changes of resting Kilocalorie expenditure after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of hip circumference (HC) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
HC was an indicator of body composition in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention HC minus the post-intervention HC was the "Changes of HC after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of waist hip ratio (WHR) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
WHR was an indicator of body composition in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The pre-intervention WHR minus the post-intervention WHR was the "Changes of WHR after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of body fat percentage after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Body fat percentage was an indicator of body composition in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention body fat percentage minus the pre-intervention body fat percentage was the "Changes of body fat percentage after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of skinfold thickness after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Skinfold thickness was an indicator of body composition in our study.
The sum of skinfold thickness was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention body fat percentage minus the pre-intervention body fat percentage was the "Changes of skinfold thickness after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of SF-12 score after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
SF-12 score was an indicator of self-perceived health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention SF-12 score minus the pre-intervention SF-12 score was the "Changes of SF-12 score after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of blood pressure (BP) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Blood pressure was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention BP minus the pre-intervention BP was the "Changes of BP after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention fasting blood glucose minus the pre-intervention fasting blood glucose was the "Changes of fasting blood glucose after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of total cholesterol (mmol/L) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention total cholesterol minus the pre-intervention total cholesterol was the "Changes of total cholesterol after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of high-density lipoprotein (HDL in mmol/L) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
High-density lipoprotein (HDL in mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention HDL minus the pre-intervention HDL was the "Changes of HDL after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of Low-density lipoprotein (LDL in mmol/L) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL in mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention LDL minus the pre-intervention LDL was the "Changes of LDL after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of triglycerides (mmol/L) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Triglycerides (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention triglycerides minus the pre-intervention triglycerides was the "Changes of triglycerides after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of dietary habits after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Dietary habits was measured by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The differences of two measurements were analyzed.
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of handgrip (kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Handgrip (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention handgrip minus the pre-intervention handgrip was the "Changes of handgrip after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of arm lift (kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Arm lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention arm lift minus the pre-intervention arm lift was the "Changes of arm lift after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of shoulder lift (kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Shoulder lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention shoulder lift minus the pre-intervention shoulder lift was the "Changes of shoulder lift after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of leg lift (kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Leg lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention leg lift minus the pre-intervention leg lift was the "Changes of leg lift after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of back lift (kg) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Back lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention back lift minus the pre-intervention back lift was the "Changes of back lift after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of balance test (sec) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Balance test (sec) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention balance test minus the pre-intervention balance test was the "Changes of balance test (sec) after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of curl-up test (reps) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Curl-up test (reps) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention curl-up test (reps) minus the pre-intervention curl-up test (reps) was the "Changes of curl-up test (reps) after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Changes of sit-and-reach (leg, cm) after intervention
Time Frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Sit-and-reach (leg, cm) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study.
It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively.
The post-intervention sit-and-reach (leg, cm) minus the pre-intervention sit-and-reach (leg, cm) was the "Changes of sit-and-reach (leg, cm) after intervention"
|
Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
|
Six-month maintenance
Time Frame: 6-month after the completion of the training sessions
|
To evaluate the adherence of the Tai Chi and walking exercise training, a questionnaire was administered at 6-month upon the completion of the training sessions to evaluate the maintenance situation of the participants.
|
6-month after the completion of the training sessions
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- HHSRF 02030511
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physical Activity
-
Istinye UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Youth | Physical Activity Barriers | Physical Activity FacilitatorsTurkey
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityWithdrawnPhysical Activity Level | Physical Activity Awareness
-
Georgetown UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedPhysical Activity | Motor ActivityUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedPhysical Activity | Physical DisabilityFrance
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical ImpairmentUnited States
-
PXL University CollegeHasselt UniversityNot yet recruitingPhysical Activity - Digital Phenotyping - Activity Tracking
-
University of ExtremaduraThe Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and UniversitiesRecruitingPhysical Activity | Cognition | Physical Fitness | AdolescentsSpain
-
AdventHealth Translational Research InstituteWake Forest UniversityRecruiting
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesMayo Clinic; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPhysical ActivityUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesMayo Clinic; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
Clinical Trials on 12-week instructor-led Tai Chi training program
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
Comenius UniversityCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompletedTotal Knee ArthroplastyHong Kong
-
Hong Kong Baptist UniversitySun Yat-sen University; Nanjing Normal UniversityCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineWithdrawnProstate Cancer | Prostatectomy
-
University of MalagaUnknownRelapsing-remitting Multiple SclerosisSpain
-
University of MichiganNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedQuality of Life | Complex Gastrointestinal SurgeryUnited States