Trial to Incentivise Adherence for Diabetes (TRIAD)

January 22, 2019 updated by: Marcel Bilger, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Diabetes Outcomes Through Financial Incentives

Type II diabetes is associated with a host of adverse and costly complications, including heart attacks, strokes, blindness, kidney failure, and severe neuropathy that may result in amputations. For those with diabetes, glycemic control is essential to minimize complications but many fail at being sufficiently adherent to their treatment. The investigators propose to test two incentive-based intervention strategies aimed at improving diabetes outcomes amongst patients with uncontrolled glycemic levels. The incentives are tied either to processes aimed at improving blood sugar levels (glucose testing, physical activity and medication adherence) or directly to the intermediary outcome (blood glucose in the acceptable range). While process incentives are likely to provide more motivation for treatment adherence, as these goals may be comparably easier to meet, these incentives only reward intermediary outcomes and it might be more effective to reward successfully achieving a health outcome directly.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Type II diabetes is associated with a host of adverse and costly complications, including heart attacks, strokes, blindness, kidney failure, and severe neuropathy that may result in amputations. For those with diabetes, intensive glycemic control is essential to minimize complications. Medication adherence, weight loss, increased exercise and improved diet have all been shown to significantly improve glycemic control, resulting in improved health outcomes and lower medical costs, including a reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Yet, despite the significant health benefits associated with adherence to diet and exercise regimes and taking diabetes medications as prescribed, non-adherence to all three is a significant problem. One strategy to improve adherence and thus long term health outcomes is to provide a clearer short term benefit. For example, those with consistent evidence of adherence to an exercise or medication regimen could receive subsidies or incentives.

Therefore, the investigators propose to test three theory-based intervention strategies aimed at improving diabetes outcomes amongst a population of uncontrolled patients (Haemoglobin A1c, HbA1c, levels of 8.0 or greater at baseline). The proposed 6-month study will randomise 240 participants, 60 in the control arm and 90 in each incentivized arm from the Geylang Polyclinic. The first strategy does not involve incentives but includes a Diabetes Educational Program (DEP) to help the patient manage their condition. Included in the program are text messages to encourage participants to take their medications as prescribed and prompt good dietary and exercise practices. Subsequent strategies incorporate incentives as core components. The incentives are tied either to processes aimed at improving blood sugar levels (glucose testing, physical activity and medication adherence) or directly to the intermediary outcome (blood glucose in the acceptable range). While process incentives are likely to provide more motivation for treatment adherence, as these goals may be comparably easier to meet, these incentives only reward intermediary outcomes and it might be more effective to reward successfully achieving a health outcome directly. The investigators see this as an important empirical question that will be answered by our proposed trial. Another advantage of outcome incentives is that they are likely to be more cost-effective than process incentives as these incentives are only spent on results.

Aims and hypotheses that will be tested:

  • Aim 1A: To determine if adding financial incentives for diabetes management to a Diabetes Educational Program (DEP), which comprises text messaging and use of study devices to encourage patient medical adherence and prompt good dietary as well as exercise practices, is more effective at improving diabetes health outcomes compared to the DEP alone.
  • Hypothesis 1A: The average reduction in HbA1c levels at 6 months will be greater for participants in the incentive arms compared to participants in the DEP arm.
  • Aim 1B: To determine whether incentivising health outcome (self-monitored blood sugar within acceptable range) is more effective at improving diabetes health outcomes than incentivising intermediate processes (blood glucose testing, physical activity and medical adherence) aimed at improving the primary outcome.
  • Hypothesis 1B: The average reduction in HbA1c levels at 6 months will be greater for participants in the health outcome incentive arm compared to participants in the processes incentive arm.
  • Aim 2: To determine which intervention (i.e. incentivising processes or outcome) is more cost effective (incrementally) at achieving reductions in HbA1c levels at 6 months.
  • Hypothesis 2: The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of the intervention incentivising health outcome will be greater than that of the intervention incentivising processes.
  • Aim 3A: To determine whether adding financial incentives for diabetes management is more effective at improving treatment adherence (assessed based on whether self-monitored blood sugar falls within acceptable range) than incentivizing intermediate processes aimed at improving the primary outcome.
  • Hypothesis 3A: The average increase in the proportion of medications and blood tests taken as prescribed and average number of daily steps at 6 months will be greater for participants in the incentive arms compared to participants in the DEP arm.
  • Aim 3B: To determine whether incentivising treatment adherence (through assessing if self-monitored blood sugar falls within acceptable range) is more effective at improving treatment adherence than incentivising intermediate processes aimed at improving the primary outcome.
  • Hypothesis 3B: The average increase in the proportion of medications and blood tests taken as prescribed and average number of daily steps at 6 months will be greater for participants in the outcome incentive arms compared to participants in the processes incentive arms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 389707
        • SingHealth Polyclinics (Geylang)
      • Singapore, Singapore, 469662
        • SingHealth Polyclinic (Bedok)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants need to be uncontrolled diabetics at Baseline. Uncontrolled diabetes is defined by a HbA1c level 8.0 or greater. Participants will be required to have at least 1 of 2 HbA1c readings 8.0 or greater in the past 6 months.
  • Be prescribed at least one diabetic medication for at least three months and be willing to have this verified by a physician.
  • Be Singaporean citizens or Permanent Residents.
  • Be able to converse in English or Mandarin.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals on inject-able insulin therapy.
  • Individuals with significant co-morbid conditions such that they are unlikely to be able to take their medications without assistance from a third party.
  • Individuals who are pregnant.
  • Individuals who fail the PARQ and do not obtain doctor's consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Diabetes Educational Program (DEP) only
Participants will receive the Diabetes Educational Program, as required, which is part of usual care at the Polyclinic. They will receive the Fitbit ™, the eCAP, and a glucometer (if they do not already have one).
Behavioral: Diabetes Educational Program (DEP)

Participants in this Arm will receive the Diabetes Educational Program (DEP), as required, which is part of usual care at the Polyclinic. It is delivered by a Health Counsellor at the point of diagnosis and focused education is provided during doctor visits for medication. The program at the Polyclinic comprises information on a series of diabetes-related issues.

The participant will receive the 2 or 3 study devices (patients will receive a glucometer if they do not already have one). The Site Study Coordinator will provide education on the use of the Fitbit Zip™ and the eCAP™. As part of usual care, patients who have difficulties with their glucometer will be referred to a Health Counsellor at the Polyclinic.
Other: DEP + Process Incentive Arm
Participants will receive the Diabetes Educational Program, as required. They will receive the Fitbit ™, the eCAP, and a glucometer (if they do not already have one). They will also have the opportunity to earn financial incentives for meeting specified process goals.
Behavioral: Diabetes Educational Program (DEP)

Participants in this Arm will receive the Diabetes Educational Program (DEP), as required, which is part of usual care at the Polyclinic. It is delivered by a Health Counsellor at the point of diagnosis and focused education is provided during doctor visits for medication. The program at the Polyclinic comprises information on a series of diabetes-related issues.

The participant will receive the 2 or 3 study devices (patients will receive a glucometer if they do not already have one). The Site Study Coordinator will provide education on the use of the Fitbit Zip™ and the eCAP™. As part of usual care, patients who have difficulties with their glucometer will be referred to a Health Counsellor at the Polyclinic.

Behavioral: DEP + Process Incentive

Participants will receive the DEP as required. In addition, participants will have the opportunity to earn financial incentives (in vouchers) for meeting specified goals:

  • SGD3.50 weekly for meeting Glucose testing goals: measuring blood glucose on three non-consecutive days each week.
  • SGD0.50 daily for Medication adherence: taking medications daily as prescribed, monitored by eCAP device. Assessed based on medication-taking times within specified time windows. Participants should be adherent at all specified mealtimes to be fully adherent for the day.
  • SGD1.00 daily for Regular Physical activity: taking 8,000 steps during the day as recorded by Fitbit.
Other: DEP + Outcome Incentive Arm
Participants will receive the Diabetes Educational Program, as required. They will receive the Fitbit ™, the eCAP, and a glucometer (if they do not already have one). They will also have the opportunity to earn financial incentives for meeting specified outcome goals.
Behavioral: Diabetes Educational Program (DEP)

Participants in this Arm will receive the Diabetes Educational Program (DEP), as required, which is part of usual care at the Polyclinic. It is delivered by a Health Counsellor at the point of diagnosis and focused education is provided during doctor visits for medication. The program at the Polyclinic comprises information on a series of diabetes-related issues.

The participant will receive the 2 or 3 study devices (patients will receive a glucometer if they do not already have one). The Site Study Coordinator will provide education on the use of the Fitbit Zip™ and the eCAP™. As part of usual care, patients who have difficulties with their glucometer will be referred to a Health Counsellor at the Polyclinic.

Behavioral: DEP + Outcome Incentive

Participants will receive the DEP as required. In addition, participants will have the opportunity to earn financial incentives (in vouchers) for recording glucose readings within the normal range (i.e. between 4 to 7mmols/L two before a meal) on 3 non-consecutive days within the week using the glucometer.

  • SGD 2 weekly if one glucose readings falls within the normal range,
  • SGD 7 weekly if two glucose readings fall within the normal range,
  • SGD 14 weekly if all three glucose readings fall within the normal range.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c levels
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
HbA1c levels will be the health outcome variable. HbA1c measures the metabolic control of diabetes, with normal values (well controlled blood glucose levels) below 7%. We hypothesise that participants with high adherence levels will have lower HbA1c levels and be more likely to have healthy (below 7%) HbA1c levels compared to less adherent participants, all being equal.
Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: Months 1 to 6
Fitbit data will be analysed to determine whether the average number of days that participants achieved the daily activity goal (8,000 or more steps per day) differs by intervention arm. Data will be reviewed for all time points, however the focus will be on physical activity in the final month of the study, which will provide the greatest evidence of potential long term behaviour change.
Months 1 to 6
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Months 1 to 6
Dose-rate adherence percentage for the last month of the study, as measured by the eCAP device. The dose-rate adherence percentage measures the proportion of times the participant took the medication within all specified pre-established dosing schedule. (Data will be reviewed for all time points, however the focus will be on the last month of the study).
Months 1 to 6
Glucose testing rates
Time Frame: Months 1 to 6
Glucose testing rates measure the proportion of days within the month that the participant tested their blood glucose levels where the denominator is the level of testing recommended by the clinician.
Months 1 to 6
Glucose testing within range
Time Frame: Months 1 to 6
The proportion of days within the month that the participant tested their blood glucose levels and the test results were within specified ranges.
Months 1 to 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcel Bilger, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NIHA-2013-1-005

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Educational Program (DEP)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Australia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe