NVAMD Satellite Study

August 28, 2018 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Multi-Satellite Comparison of Standard-of-Care, Physician-Based Retinal Evaluation Versus Physician-Guided Diagnostic Evaluation in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy

Intravitreal delivery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs has revolutionized the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). However, the requirement for near monthly administration of therapy coupled with the growing number of patients needing treatment has become a universal challenge in efficient delivery of care for retina physicians. While many retina practices have both increased the size of their staffs to accommodate the growing patient population and increased efficiency with the aid of digital photography, patient encounter times in clinic continue to increase, often spanning 2-4 hours. While maintaining the highest level of patient care, a streamlined alternative in the evaluation of patients with NVAMD to determine whether intravitreal therapy with an anti-VEGF agent is indicated at a particular office visit would be desirable.

This multi-satellite, prospective, randomized pilot study will compare standard-of-care, physician- based retinal evaluation, defined as retinal examination by a physician and standard imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optional fluorescein angiography (FA), versus physician-guided diagnostic evaluation, defined as standard imaging with OCT and optional FA without retinal examination by a physician in the management of NVAMD with anti-VEGF therapy. Outcomes for this study are aimed primarily at demonstrating that the physician-guided diagnostic approach to managing patients with NVAMD is not inferior to the physician-based retinal evaluation based on measures such as a change from baseline in visual acuity and in central subfield thickness (CSF) on OCT. Other outcomes to be assessed in this study are length of visit times, numbers of intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents administered, numbers of diagnostic tests performed to determine whether treatment should be given at each visit, and frequency of retinal examinations performed for each participating patient in each cohort. Perceptions of quality of vision and patient satisfaction will be captured by interviews with patients following each clinic visit; clinical impressions of physicians will be captured by a brief physician survey. Finally, the feasibility of recruiting patients, as measured by how many eligible patients are seen at each Wilmer satellite, how many patients agree to be randomized, how many patients follow-up, and the attrition rates at the 4 and 8-month outcome visits will be assessed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bel Air, Maryland, United States, 21014
        • Wilmer Eye Institute
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814
        • Wilmer Eye Institute
      • Columbia, Maryland, United States, 21044
        • Wilmer Eye Institute
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21702
        • Wilmer Eye Institute
      • Lutherville, Maryland, United States, 21093
        • Wilmer Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Established diagnosis of NVAMD in one or both eyes
  • Received 2 or more intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF therapy from the retinal physician during the prior 6 months
  • Need for more therapy on a near monthly basis is anticipated
  • Usual corrected visual acuity (UCVA) of at least one eye must be 20/200 or better
  • Must be physically able to cooperate with OCT and other diagnostic imaging procedures
  • Must be able to give informed consent and be able to complete telephone surveys

Exclusion criteria:

  • Systemic disease that can affect the peripheral retina (e.g., diabetes mellitus, sickle cell)
  • History of symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment, retinal tear, or retinal detachment
  • History of retinal surgery will not be enrolled.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: SOC Examination Based Cohort
Participants in this arm will receive standard of care (SOC) retinal examinations at each study visit.
Active Comparator: Physician-Guided Diagnostic
Participants in this arm of the study will only receive the physical standard-of-care retinal examination at the 4-month and -month office visits, unless requested by the Physician-Investigator or study participant. At each standard study visit, the physician will use diagnostic imaging to determine if the participant will receive the anti-VEGF injection.
NVAMD participants in the physician-guided diagnostic arm will have receive injections based on diagnostic imaging provided by optical coherence tomography and optional fluorescein angiography, those in this group will only receive retinal examinations at the 4- and 8-month clinic visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in visual acuity from baseline
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years
Change in OCT CSF from baseline
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
total encounter time for each arm
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections administered
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years
number of diagnostic tests performed
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years
number of retinal examinations performed
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Solomon, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Physician-guided diagnostic

Subscribe