PROs in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Accompanying Lower Limb Pain (Neuropathic Component) Treated With Pregabalin (PRO)

Patient-reported-outcomes(PROs) in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Accompanying Lower Limb Pain (Neuropathic Component) Treated With Pregabalin in Primary Care Settings

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pregabalin comparing with the conventional analgesic care in chronic low back pain patients with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) treated in primary care settings under routine clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rational and background :

The care for low back pain associated with neuropathic pain is a problem often encountered in daily outpatient.

And the care effectiveness has been frequently evaluated by the patients directly, because the pain would be felt by patients themselves.

On the view of those, we decided to investigate the clinical treatment outcome of pregabalin or other analgesics medication for relief of pain and improvement of sleep interference and QOLs by Patient-reported outcomes.

Research question and objectives :

To evaluate the effect of pregabalin comparing with the conventional analgesic care in chronic low back pain patients with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) treated in primary care settings under routine clinical practice.

Study design:

This is an 8-week, multicenter prospective observational study. Subjects who have chronic low back pain patients with accompanying lower limb pain (with a neuropathic component) and meet all other entry criteria are enrolled at baseline in the duration of study. The analgesic treatment is determined by the clinical judgment of the physician in charge of patient management. This therapeutic choice is not related to the decision to take part in the study. All enrolled subjects will be received with analgesic treatment. The study requires 3 visits at least, baseline/enrollment visit, Week 4 visit and Week 8 visit (or discontinuation).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

331

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kagoshima, Japan
        • Nakamura Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Kagoshima, Japan
        • Showa-kai Clinic
      • Miyazaki, Japan
        • Clinic Ushitani
      • Miyazaki, Japan
        • Kohnan Matsumoto Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Saitama, Japan
        • Iwasaki Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
        • Kimura Clinic
    • Chiba
      • Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan, 272-0133
        • Jin Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
        • Satoh Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
        • Shiraishi Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Ota General Hospital
      • Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Aoki Orthpaedic Clinic
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Hiyoshi Hocho Clinic
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Yamamoto Memorial Hospital
    • Saitama
      • Ageo, Saitama, Japan
        • Ageo Medical Clinic
      • Fujimino, Saitama, Japan
        • Arai Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Tokyo
      • Adachi, Tokyo, Japan
        • Nakaicho Clinic
      • Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
        • Mitsuda Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Chuo, Tokyo, Japan
        • Kyobashi Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Edogawa, Tokyo, Japan
        • Morishima Clinic
      • Kita, Tokyo, Japan
        • Kita Akabane Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Kita, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeuchi Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
        • Tanaka Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Koto, Tokyo, Japan
        • Araki Clinic
      • Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
        • Kohsei Chuo General Hospital
      • Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
        • Meguro Seikeigeka Naika
      • Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
        • Meguro Yuai Clinic
      • Ohta, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takemoto Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan
        • Shiotani Pain Clinic
      • Toshima, Tokyo, Japan
        • Daido Hospital
      • Toshima, Tokyo, Japan
        • Senkawa Shinoda Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Toshima, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takahashi Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Yokohama
      • Kanazawa, Yokohama, Japan
        • Kanazawa Hospital
      • Tsurumi, Yokohama, Japan
        • Katayama Orthopaedic Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic low-back pain patients with neuropathic component will be treated with pregabalin or other analgesics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject who received the enough study information and signed informed consent form.
  2. Subject who had chronic low back pain accompanying with lower limb pain from the knee to the ankle.
  3. Subject is male or female patient ≥18 years old.
  4. Subject who has complained low back pain for 3 months or more before Visit 1.
  5. Subject who is refractory to prior analgesics for 3 months and more.
  6. Subject who is able and willing to complete all study related assessment and comply with the study schedule and clinical procedures at clinic.
  7. Subject whose pain Numeric Rating Scale(NRS) ≥ 5 at baseline (based on recall over the past week)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, was not likely to complete the trial for whatever reason.
  2. Subject who has been already treated by pregabalin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pregabalin
Patients will be treated for 8 weeks with pregabalin in primary care: no intervention
The study is observational
Usual care
Patients will be treated for 8 weeks with other analgesics in usual care: no intervention
The study is observational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Pain Related Sleep Interference Scale (PRSIS - Past Week Recall)
Time Frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 8)
The Pain Related Sleep Interference Scale (past week recall) consists of an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 (pain did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interfered with sleep). Change the rating scale from baseline to week 8 in each group. Subjects are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past week by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10.
Baseline, Final Visit (Week 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)-Total Score-
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The RMDQ is an index of how well patients with low back pain are able to function with regard to daily activities. The score for the index ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating better function.
Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)-Japanese Standardized Score-
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The RMDQ is an index of how well patients with low back pain are able to function with regard to daily activities. The score for the index ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating better function.
Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Pain NRS - Past Week Recall)
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The Pain NRS (past week recall) consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Subjects are asked to describe their average pain during the past week by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10.
Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Euro Qol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L)-QOL-Score-
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The EQ-5D-5L is a copyrighted, subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. The Health State Profile is designed to record the subject's level of current health for five domains comprising a health profile: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Responses from the five domains are used to calculate a single utility index value.; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 5 indicates worst health state (eg, "confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile; from 11111 to 55555. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.025 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Euro Qol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L)-Visual Analogue Scale -
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)

The EQ-5D-5L is a copyrighted, subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L: A Health State Profile and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Recent guidance suggests that the Health State Profile and VAS should be administered together.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to rate the subject's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Baseline, Visit2 (Week4), Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Time Frame: Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The CGIC assessment includes one question (1-7 scale) inquiring about the subject's improvement considering their current disease state.; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Patient Global Improvement of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
The PGIC is a subject-rated instrument that measures change in the subject's overall status on a 7-point scale. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI:LBP)
Time Frame: Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)

The WPAI: LBP is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities. Subscale scores include Percent work time missed due to pain (PWP), Percent overall work impairment (PWI), Percent work productivity impairment due to pain (PWPI), Percent overall activity impairment (PAI). Each subscale score is expressed as an impairment percentage (0-100) where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. Here, "n" signifies "Number of participants" for Baseline.

In this study, the WPAI: LBP will measure the effect of the patient's Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) on work productivity and regular activities.

Final Visit (Week8 or discontinuation)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Visit2(week4),Final Visit(Week8 or discontinuation)
Visit2(week4),Final Visit(Week8 or discontinuation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Koichi Fujii, MD, Director of Pain/Neuroscience Medical Affairs,Pfizer Japan Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A0081333

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe