First-time Parents Physical Activity Intervention

December 10, 2020 updated by: Ryan Rhodes, University of Victoria

This study will be investigating whether a theory-based physical activity intervention can maintain/improve moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity measured via accelerometry of new parents over the eight months of having a child compared to a control group of new parents.

Hypothesis: The theory-based condition will change salient underlying motives (theory of planned behaviour constructs) for physical activity. Health-related fitness and quality of life will also be higher for this condition in comparison to the control condition. (Note: improvements in both groups of mothers may occur due to recovery from pregnancy, but our hypotheses will still hold). All outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months in the theory-based condition compared to the standard condition

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clearly the prevention of chronic disease through physical activity promotion is an important research area. Identifying critical life transitions in people's physical activity behaviours may illuminate the most opportune intervention apertures for chronic disease prevention. A substantive evidence base now indicates that parenthood is one of these critical transition points for physical activity decline. Our proposed study will examine whether a brief, theory-based, and cost-effective intervention can help maintain/improve the physical activity behaviours of new parents in their first eight months of the parenthood experience. The study represents the first couple-based physical activity initiative in the parenthood literature; prior research has only focused on mothers and has shown short-term changes in physical activity that return to baseline levels after approximately one month. In light of the potential for couples to provide important sources of social support for the other parent within the household, it would seem remiss not to consider parenting interventions that are directed and evaluated at the dyadic level. Furthermore, couple-based interventions in other populations and other health behaviour domains have been shown as more effective than individual-level intervention. The long-term impact of this study, if the results support our hypotheses, has utility to prevent or curb the decline of physical activity habits based on our findings. This research has the clear potential to be applied to population-level knowledge translation sources such as prenatal classes, physician offices, and other early parent learning/counselling avenues.

Parents will be measured at baseline (2 months post partum) with two assessment points at six weeks (3.5 months post partum) and three months (5 months post partum) and a final follow-up assessment six months later (8 months post partum). The content of the theory-based intervention was derived from the results of our prior CDA and SSHRC-funded longitudinal trial of new parents using the theory of planned behaviour to predict changes in physical activity, the content used in prior pilot-level studies that has already been successful in changing short-term physical activity in mothers 26-30, and the content of our current CIHR-funded study of physical activity goal planning.

Primary Research Question

1) Does the theory-based condition improve adherence to regular physical activity among new parents when compared to those in the control condition at eight months after the birth of their first child? Hypothesis: Adherence will be higher for parents in the theory-based condition in comparison to parents in the control condition after controlling for possible confounds. The adherence effect may wane over time from the initial measurement period of two months after the onset of parenthood but all outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months.

Secondary Research Questions

  1. Does the theory-based condition improve motivational, health-related quality of life, and health-related fitness outcomes among new parents when compared to those in the control condition at eight months after the onset of parenthood? Hypothesis: The theory-based condition will change salient underlying motives (theory of planned behaviour constructs) for physical activity because its basis is from the key results of our prior longitudinal trial of new parents. Health-related fitness and quality of life, will also be higher for this condition in comparison to the control condition, (footnote: improvements in both groups of mothers may occur due to recovery from pregnancy, but our hypotheses will still hold). All outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months in the theory-based condition compared to the standard physical activity education group.

  2. Can group differences among new parents with regard to these motivational, behavioural, and health-related fitness outcomes be explained through a mediation model?

    Hypothesis: The covariance of the assigned conditions (theory-based, standard) on adherence will be explained by changes in the salient underlying motives for physical activity (i.e., manipulation check). In turn, the covariance between these salient underlying motives and health-related outcomes will be explained by physical activity adherence among conditions.

  3. Can motivational variables predict adherence? Do these differ by condition?

    Hypothesis: The approach will test Ajzen's 39 theory of planned behavior. Affective attitude and perceived behavioural control will predict intention, intention will predict adherence across conditions similar to our prior study with this population 41.

  4. Is there a seasonal, initial physical activity status, mental health or gender difference across primary outcomes by assigned condition?

Hypothesis: No differences in gender or season are hypothesized based on our lack of evidence in the prior trial41, but these are exploratory research questions because there is limited research at present to make any definitive statement. The examination of whether the intervention affects maintenance or increases in baseline physical activity via stratification of baseline values will also be explored as will the assessment of baseline depression and anxiety.

Recruitment: We began feasibility recruitment and procedures last year in order to establish our protocol, and pilot our intervention material. Based on this feasibility study, participant recruitment is being achieved with both active (pregnancy class visits) and passive recruitment techniques (notice of research and poster). The active recruitment is being conducted through community organizations offering prenatal classes and programming for first-time parents. The project coordinator and research assistants associated with this project are the main point of contact for potential participants. Organizations are contacted by the research coordinator and asked if they are interested in giving 10 minutes of time (prenatal class, workshop).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8P-5C2
        • University of Victoria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Married or common law couples
  • Living in Greater Victoria
  • Expecting first child
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger than 18
  • Expecting second or third child

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Theory-based group
The theory-based intervention group will receive strategies based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour to help increase physical activity among couples. Parents will receive materials on how to work together.
Behavioral: Theory-based group
Workbooks and mini-counselling sessions will be provided to participants in this group.
No Intervention: Information group
The information group will serve as the control group and will receive informational materials on the benefits of physical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Objective and Self-report Physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, and 6 months
Physical activity will be measured objectively for 7 consecutive days using the wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor combined with self-report of PA using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (LSI) at each time period.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic information
Time Frame: Baseline
Basic information on gender, age, ethnicity, income, education level will be gathered.
Baseline
Health measures
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Information on leave status, child care status, diet, sleep (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) and breastfeeding status, smoking, alcohol consumption will be included in this assessment.
Baseline and 6 months
Motivation for physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
Motivation will be measured using the constructs of the theory of planned behaviour. Items will measure all components of the model (affective attitude, instrumental attitude, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, perceived control, planning) including behavioural, normative, and control beliefs.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
Health related quality of life/psychosocial distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
This will be assessed with parents using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. In addition, we will assess depressive and anxiety symptoms with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which also has sound reliability and validity compared to similar instruments.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
Health related fitness
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We will assess the key components of health-related physical fitness including body composition, aerobic fitness and musculoskeletal fitness which are valid for males and females.
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Victoria

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ryan Rhodes, PhD., University of Victoria
  • Study Director: Mark Beauchamp, PhD, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Chris Blanchard, PhD, Dalhousie
  • Study Director: Darren Warburton, PhD, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Danielle Downs, PhD, Penn State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 133614

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Theory-based group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Sweden

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe