Adaptive Recalibration of Prosthetic Leg Neural Control System

October 27, 2020 updated by: Levi Hargrove, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
The purpose of this study is for transfemoral amputees to walk with an experimental robotic prosthesis. Electric signals will be measured from their muscles and used to help control an artificial leg. The investigators will record from sensors placed on a prosthesis and electric signals measured from muscles in the participants leg to see if the investigators can develop better computer programs to help predict subject actions and prostheses function.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators propose to use a powered knee-ankle prosthesis that is not yet commercially available. The hierarchical control framework the investigators are developing will be equally applicable to any prosthetic leg that needs to be transitioned between ambulation modes, including microprocessor-controlled passive devices.

The overall objective is to develop and evaluate an adaptive framework for controlling lower limb prostheses that compensates for changes in EMG signals. When a participant walks on a lower limb prosthesis, the output of the high-level controller (or ambulation mode predictor) directly influences patterns generated by the participant. After the participant has completed the subsequent stride, a gait pattern estimator (GPE), will provide a label of what the participant actually did. This may differ from the ambulation mode predictor output if there was a misclassification. The label will then be used to update the ambulation mode predictor algorithm such that future steps are predicted with higher accuracies. Finally, the resulting system will be transferred to an embedded system and tested in real-time with transfemoral amputees and compared to a non-adaptive system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Amputee Subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lower Limb Amputees
  • K2/K3/K4 ambulators

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Over 250lbs body weight
  • Inactive, physically unfit
  • cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair their ability to give informed consent or to follow simple instructions during the experiments
  • Pregnant women
  • co-morbidity that interferes with the study (e.g. stroke, pace maker placement, severe ischemia cardiac disease, etc.)

Able-bodied Subjects:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • no injury on either lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inactive, physically unfit
  • over 250 lbs body weight
  • cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair their ability to give informed consent or impair their ability to follow simple instructions during the experiments
  • Pregnant women (status determined by self-reporting)
  • co-morbidity that interferes with the study (e.g. stroke, pace maker placement, severe ischemia cardiac disease, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Evaluate a real-time adaptive neural control system
The prosthesis will be tuned, for each subject: level-ground walking, walking up and down slopes and walking up and down stairs. We anticipate that participants will visit the laboratory approximately 6-9 times over 2 months (2-3 visits for socket duplications and modifications, 2-3 visits for control system tuning, and an additional 2-3 visits for practice using the tuned system). By the end of these visits, the goal is to have a properly fitting socket and for the subjects to ambulate proficiently with the powered prosthesis. After tuning, the subjects will complete 20 ambulation circuits (level ground walking, walking up and down slopes, up and down stairs). This will provide training data for our pattern recognition control systems.
A powered knee and ankle prosthesis developed by Vanderbilt University.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decreased error rates for pattern recognition system used to predict ambulation modes
Time Frame: Assessed at approximately 2 months and 6 months after enrollment
Pattern recognition algorithms have been used to allow seamless and automatic transitioning between ambulation modes. Classification errors result in the prosthesis predicting the wrong ambulation mode. A decrease in errors results in improved mode prediction by the prosthesis. EMG from the participant and mechanical sensor data from the prosthesis are processed with the use of a phase-based-dependent pattern recognition classification method. The data collection will yield three groups of 10 real-time trials. The investigators primary analysis will be a repeated measures ANOVA with a planned contrast between the groups. The investigators will also complete a secondary analysis using the data collected while the participants ambulated outside of the laboratory. The total number of misclassifications will be computed. This will allow the investigator to evaluate the rate at which the overall classification system adapted.
Assessed at approximately 2 months and 6 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00101767

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on Powered knee and ankle prosthesis

3
Subscribe