Lung Cancer Nurse Model: a Phase II Study (LCN-II)

February 7, 2015 updated by: Dr Manuela Eicher, University of Freiburg

Development and Feasibility of a Lung Cancer Nurse Model During Early Treatment: a Phase II Study

Lung cancer patients experience significant physical symptoms, psychological distress and have many supportive care needs that impact on quality of life. Implementing the role of a Lung Cancer Nurse (LCN) is a response to meet the needs of patients and caregivers.

Primary aim is to assess the feasibility of a LCN intervention and feasibility to collect longitudinal patient self-assessment questionnaires at the Thoracic Cancer Centre of the University Hospital of Lausanne.

Secondary aims are: i) to describe self-reported changes in self-efficacy, symptoms and unmet supportive care needs across three time points during the first line therapy and ii) to explore professional acceptability of the new LCN model evaluating the perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the model by the LCN and the other multidisciplinary members of the comprehensive lung cancer care team.

An exact single-stage (no interim analysis) design will be applied to determine feasibility for further studies to be undertaken. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed descriptively at each data collection (Baseline, Time1, Time2) time point and professional acceptability will be explored by focus groups with selected members of the interdisciplinary team.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

To develop adequate self-care strategies, patients with lung cancer and their families are in need of emotional, informational and behavioural supportive care. Supportive care in cancer can reduce symptom burden and improve patients and their families self-management skills. As lung cancer incidence continues to rise, and increased attention is given to early diagnosis, research on early involvement of lung cancer nurse (LCN) in care, the feasibility and impact on patient outcomes is needed.

Primary aim is to assess the feasibility of a LCN intervention and feasibility to collect longitudinal (Baseline, Time1, Time2) patient self-assessment questionnaires at the Thoracic Cancer Centre of the University Hospital of Lausanne.

Secondary aims are: i) to describe self-reported changes in self-efficacy, symptoms and unmet supportive care needs across three time points during the first line therapy and ii) to explore professional acceptability of the new LCN model evaluating the perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the model by the LCN and the other multidisciplinary members of the comprehensive lung cancer care team.

An exact single-stage (no interim analysis) design will be applied to determine feasibility for further studies to be undertaken. Lung cancer patients with planned systemic therapy with or without radiotherapy will be recruited at the thoracic cancer center in a Swiss University Hospital. The LCN model of care consists of two face-to-face consultations alternating with two telephone consultations during systemic therapy. LCN consultations will comprise focused assessment of physical and psychological symptoms, information (printed and oral) about disease and its treatment, therapeutic education concerning strategies to manage physical and psychosocial symptoms and review of available support resources. Participants will be invited to complete the validated patient reported Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, Supportive Care Needs Screening Tool 9 and Self-Efficacy Scale for Lung Cancer. Study data will be collected at baseline (day 1 of systemic therapy), time 1 (week 3 of systemic therapy) and time 2 (week 11 of systemic therapy). Participants will be categorized as adherent if they complete all their scheduled LCN consultations and questionnaires. For a 5% probability of accepting a poor feasibility (alpha) and a 20% probability of rejecting an acceptable feasibility (beta) we then need to enroll 71 patients. Feasibility will be considered as acceptable for further studies if at least 36 patients will be compliant. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed descriptively for each variable (self-efficacy, symptoms and supportive care needs) across each time point. At the end of quantitative data collection, a focus group will be conducted to explore acceptability of the new role among health professionals working with the LCN in order to identify perceived barriers and facilitators for collaborative work with the new role.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

71

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1004
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Lausanne
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Lung cancer patients newly diagnosed receiving systemic therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients newly diagnosed lung cancer (NSCLC or SCLC)
  • Patients capable of speaking and writing in French
  • Patients undergoing programmed a systemic treatment (with or without radiotherapy treatment)
  • Estimated life expectancy more than 6-months
  • Signing the written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with lung cancer receiving only surgery treatment or only a radiotherapy treatment
  • Patients not physically or emotionally capable of participating in the trial as determined by their oncologist (existing mental illness or severe physical disability)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: 11 weeks
For a 5% probability of accepting a poor feasibility and a 20% probability of rejecting an acceptable feasibility we need to enroll 71 patients. Feasibility will be considered as acceptable for further studies if at least 36 patients reach the end of the study completing their scheduled Lung Cancer Nurse consultations and patients completed the three questionnaire at each data collect time (baseline, time 1 and time 2)
11 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung cancer symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline-Week 3- Week 11
Symptoms will be measured by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale .This inventory consists of 9 items relating to appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and pain related to lung malignancies and three summary items on symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global health-related quality of life. Each item is scored on a visual scale 0-100 (0=no symptom; 100 symptom as bad as can be).
Baseline-Week 3- Week 11
Unmet Supportive Care Need
Time Frame: Baseline-Week 3- Week 11
Unmet Supportive Care Needs will be measured by the the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool 9 (SCNS ST 9). The 9 items of the scale fall into five analytically derived factor domains: i) psychological, ii) health system and information, iii) physical and daily living, iv) patient care and support, and v) sexuality. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (not applicable=1; satisfied=2; low need=3; moderate need=4; High need=5).
Baseline-Week 3- Week 11
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline-Week 3- Week 11
Self-efficacy will be measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale for lung cancer. This scale is composed by 16 items regarding patients' perceived ability to manage a variety of symptoms on a scale of 10 (not at all certain) to 100 (completely certain). The instrument includes three subscale concerning: i) self-efficacy for managing pain, ii) self-efficacy for managing other symptoms, and iii) self-efficacy for functions.
Baseline-Week 3- Week 11

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Manuela Eicher, Dr, University of Freiburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on therapeutic education and psychological support

3
Subscribe