Genetic Testing and Counseling to Reduce Diabetic Complications

March 6, 2022 updated by: Professor Ronald C.W. Ma, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare a Strategy Utilizing Genetic Testing and Personalized Risk Counseling With Standard Care on Patient Empowerment, Risk Factors Control and the Risk of Diabetic Complications

The risk of diabetic kidney complications includes non-modifiable risk factors such as genetic predictors, as well as modifiable risk factors such as hyperglycaemia, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and proteinuria. Genetic testing for personalized medicine is increasing in popularity, though evidence that genetic testing can empower patients to modify behaviour and reduce clinical risk remains lacking. In this project, the investigators aim to utilize a personalized risk counseling with genetic testing to evaluate its impact on risk factor control in diabetic patients. The investigators hypothesize that knowledge of genetic +/- clinical risk will empower patients and lead to improvement in the number of treatment targets achieved. The investigators will recruit 400 patients with diabetes. All subjects will undergo a comprehensive assessment of the risk of diabetic complications based on clinical risk factors. Half of the patients will be randomized to receive additional genetic testing of a panel of genetic markers proven to predict renal complications in our population: ACE I/D, aldose reductase (CA)n and PRKCB1 gene polymorphisms. The results of personalized risk assessment will be communicated by a health counsellor in the intervention arm. The impact of testing and patient knowledge of the result of genetic testing on achievement of treatment targets (A1c, BP, LDL-cholesterol, TG, use of ACEI/ARB) and patient behavior will be evaluated after 12 months. The other arm will receive results of the genetic testing at the completion of the study period. The study will help towards developing a strategy to empower patients through structured and personalized risk assessment will provide a novel approach to identify high-risk subjects for early intensive management, and may lead to reduction in long-term complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Asia is in the midst of an epidemic of diabetes. Approximately 1 in 10 people in China has diabetes [1]. Asian patients with diabetes are characterized by early age of onset and increased risk of kidney complications. Young age of onset and long disease duration will place Chinese diabetic patients at high risk for complications. In the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry, which includes more than 7000 patients with type 2 diabetes, we have reported a high risk of diabetic complications, with 30% having died or sustained a major clinical event within 10years after diagnosis, including 10% developing cardiovascular complications, and 10% developing end-stage renal disease [2] [3]. The medical costs for the diabetic patient with complication is 2.2-3.8 fold that of patients without complications, and patients with cardiorenal complications are the most costly to manage [4]. Using our registry, we have identified clinical risk predictors for developing renal complications as glycaemic control, elevated blood pressure, hyperlipidaemia, and albuminuria [2] [3, 5], and have derived clinical risk prediction algorithms and incorporated them into a patient management portal, which can generate a standardized report for risk counseling based on clinical risk factors [6, 7]. Furthermore, in a multi-centre study utilizing a multidisciplinary team, we found that intensive management aiming to achieve targets of A1c, lipids, BP can significantly reduce the risk of developing kidney complication [8]. Therefore, the ability to identify subjects at risk of complications, and to target and motivate them to optimize modifiable risk factors for diabetic complications will be of clinical benefit and potentially cost-saving.

There has been much recent interest in the use of genetic testing for personalized medicine [9]. Diabetic kidney complications has high heritability of around 40% and several genetic factors have been found to be associated with diabetic renal complications. Using candidate-gene approach, our group has identified several genetic markers for diabetic kidney complications [10, 11] [12]. These include the angiotensin converting enzyme deletion/ insertion (ACE D/I) polymorphism and the aldose reductase (ALR2) 5'-(CA) n microsatellite polymorphism, each being associated with 2-3 fold increased risk of diabetic cardio-renal complications in Chinese [10, 13]. More recently, we have found that carriers of risk alleles at the protein kinase C-β1 (PRKCB1) locus can have up to 6-fold increased risk of developing end-stage renal disease during follow-up, after adjusting for the effect of clinical risk predictors [12].

The recent increase in consumer-initiated genetic testing has been driven by direct-to-consumer genetic testing, which assumes that personal genetic information can motivate positive behavioural change in patients [14]. Interestingly, a recent survey of patients without type 2 diabetes suggests that genetic testing may be able to motivate patients, with 71% of respondents reporting that they would be "much more motivated" to make behavioural changes if they were informed to be of high genetic risk for diabetes [15]. Although evidence that genetic testing can lead to behavioural changes is still lacking, several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to examine the impact of genetic testing on behaviour to reduce risk of diabetes. Given the disabling consequences of diabetic complications, and the ability to predict those at risk of developing complications, we plan to examine the role of personalized risk counseling incorporating genetic markers, and to examine its role in patient empowerment and risk factor control, which may help to reduce the risk of developing complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

435

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults with type 2 diabetes aged 40-75 who can give informed consent
  2. Subjects with no known chronic kidney disease (CKD defined as eGFR<60ml/min at baseline)
  3. Suboptimal glucose control with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%
  4. Known history of hypertension including elevated BP ≥140/90 on more than one occasion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with known coronary artery disease or coronary revascularisation
  2. Subjects with previous history of cerebrovascular accident
  3. Subjects with known proliferative retinopathy or previous laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy
  4. Subjects with life-threatening conditions including malignancy
  5. Subjects with known psychiatric conditions including depression
  6. Subjects with significant renal impairment (eGFR<60ml/min at baseline) or non-diabetic renal disease (e.g. biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis or obstructive uropathy)
  7. Subjects with major physical disability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized risk counselling
Intervention includes risk counseling to patients with diabetes on future risk of diabetic complications based on an established genetic counseling framework for common polygenic disorders which will be delivered to patient in a counselling sesssion 6 weeks after genetic testing
Motivational message- towards lifestyle change, improved compliance and risk factors control Review overall control of clinical risk factors based on lab test results
Placebo Comparator: Normal usual care
Intervention includes normal usual care. General education on diabetes and diabetic complications
General education on diabetes and diabetic complications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of patients attaining ≥ 3 pre-defined treatment targets from the following treatment targets: 1) BP <130/80 mm Hg 2) HbA1c <7% 3) Calculated LDL-cholesterol <2.6mmol/l 4) Fasting TG <2mmol/l 5) Use of ACEI or ARB
Time Frame: At 1 year
primary outcome of 3 out of 5 targets achieved as defined above
At 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
microalbuminuria as a marker of degree of renal damage
Time Frame: At 1 year
new onset of microalbuminuria at 1 year follow-up
At 1 year
Patient empowerment as measured on the Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES)
Time Frame: At 1 year
Score on the DES
At 1 year
Patient behavior measured on the Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA)
Time Frame: At 1 year
Score of diabetes self-care as measured by the SDSCA
At 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ronald C Ma, MB BChir, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GEM Study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Complication

Clinical Trials on Personalized Risk Counselling

3
Subscribe