San Francisco Health Plan Care Support Trial (SFHP_CBCM)

January 14, 2019 updated by: Maria Raven, MD, University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco Health Plan Care Support Intervention: A Randomized Trial

This study will expand and evaluate an existing pilot program to improve care for frequent users of acute emergency and inpatient services by providing care coordination and management for eligible San Francisco Health Plan members. SF Health Plan's Community-Based Care Management pilot program ("Program") known as "CareSupport" serves vulnerable SF Health Plan members who are high utilizers of hospital inpatient and emergency departments and at extremely high risk for mortality and morbidity due to factors such as housing instability, mental illness, and addiction. Care managers, called community coordinators, are trained bachelor-level social workers or outreach workers and each have a panel of 30-35 members who they directly engage in the community where the members tend to live or congregate (shelters, bus stops, coffee shops, community agencies, and by cell phone) to help them improve their health and navigate through the health care and social services systems. The number of San Francisco Health Plan members who would be eligible for Care Support services far outstrips the capacity the San Francisco Health Plan to provide these additional services, and the investigators will thus evaluate the intervention using a randomized trial design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Purpose: The purpose of the CareSupport intervention is to coordinate often-fragmented care for SFHP members with heavy use of acute health care services, reducing cost of care for the San Francisco safety net (the San Francisco Department of Health and San Francisco General Hospital) while increasing use of sustaining services including primary care.

The Program: The San Francisco Health Plan (SFHP) CareSupport program identifies high-utilizing SFHP members with high risk for mortality and morbidity due to factors that complicate underlying illness and care seeking patterns. These factors include housing instability, behavioral health issues, and complex medical illness. This population's medical, behavioral and social needs are not met by the existing delivery system, and while many issues they face may not be traditionally perceived as health care, they do impact this vulnerable population's health and care seeking patterns greatly.

CareSupport Community Coordinators each carry a caseload of 25-35 eligible members identified based on health services use in the prior 12 months. Each team of 5 Coordinators is supervised by a skilled master's level Social Worker. Community Coordinators outreach to eligible patients and conduct detailed assessments in order to develop a Care Plan that is then shared with other providers within and outside of SFHP. Community Coordinators provide patient-centered, community-based advocacy and navigation across systems of care, to improve coordination and unify health and treatment goals. The CareSupport program incorporates a focus on prevention and early intervention within a continuum of quality health care that includes disease management, advocacy, appointment reminders and accompaniment, home visits, and regular communication with primary care and other providers. Community Coordinators are accountable for coordinating and following through on all aspects of a member's needs, and their duties are as variable as reminder calls, accompaniment to medical appointments, assistance with housing placement, and help obtaining food and other services. Twice weekly team meetings involve complex case reviews and program troubleshooting as well as mini trainings led by social work supervisors. The staff is trained in trauma-informed care, motivational interviewing, harm reduction, and other areas of relevance to the intervention target population.

The investigators' composed of 3 groups of SFHP members, all of whom are heavy users of health care services: 1) members with a minimum of 2 hospitalizations in the year before enrollment 2) members with 5 ED visits and 1 hospitalization in the year before enrollment, and 3) members with 6 or more ED visits in the year before enrollment in the investigators' program.

The current CareSupport staff does not have the capacity to serve all SFHP members who are eligible for CareSupport. The investigators propose to ethically allocate limited resources and evaluate the impact of CareSupport using a randomly selected comparison group of non-enrolled, CareSupport eligible SFHP members.

Randomization

Randomization process: First, eligible members will be rank ordered by descending age, then based first on number of hospital admissions in the prior year, and finally by number of ED visits in the prior year. SFHP members falling into the CareSupport target population based on their utilization in the prior 12 months will be assigned using a standard "every other" technique to either the CareSupport program (the intervention) or to the comparison group that will not be offered enrollment. This technique will result in a "member pair," where one member from the pair will be randomly assigned to the CareSupport intervention and one member of the pair will be randomly assigned to the comparison group. For the purposes of the evaluation, the member pair will share the same engagement date (see below).

The investigators will use an intention to treat framework: all SFHP members assigned to CareSupport or the comparison group will remain in those groups for the analysis.

Outcomes and Evaluation Methods As mentioned above, SFHP has enrollment, demographic and encounter/claims data for all SFHP members and these data will be used to conduct the investigators' analysis. The investigators' primary outcomes can be tracked based on administrative encounter data, and will include member services use across San Francisco rather than being limited to a single hospital or small network of clinics.

A central goal of the investigators' evaluation is to determine whether the CareSupport demonstration project generates more savings to the delivery system than it costs to implement and sustain. The ability of the CareSupport program to succeed in this goal will help determine whether it is sustainable and exportable to other sites. The investigators anticipate that the CBCM model will produce cost-savings both by employing less expensive, more appropriately-trained staff, as well as by connecting vulnerable members more effectively to primary and preventive care, and social and behavioral resources, thereby reducing their use of acute care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

292

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94105
        • San Francisco Health Plan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To be eligible, SFHP members must have one of three health service use patterns in the prior 12 months:

  • 2 or more hospital admissions
  • 5 ED visits and 1 hospital admission
  • 6 or more ED visits
  • Must be aged 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under age 18
  • Not a SFHP member

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Care Support Intervention
Eligible members are assigned a CareSupport Coordinator who carries a caseload of 25-35 members. A team of 5 Coordinators is supervised by a master's level Social Worker. Community Coordinators work with members to conduct standardized assessments to develop a Care Plan shared with other providers within and outside of SFHP. Coordinators provide members advocacy and navigation across systems of care, to improve coordination focus on treatment goals. Coordinator focus on prevention and early intervention around disease management, advocacy, appointment reminders and accompaniment, home visits, and regular communication with primary care and other providers. Coordinators are encouraged to be accountable for coordinating and following through on all aspects of a member's needs.
Case management and care coordination intervention delivered in person to SFHP members who are frequent users of emergency department and inpatient hospital services.
No Intervention: Usual Care
All eligible SFHP members randomized to usual care will receive medical and health plan by virtue of enrollment in the SFHP and Medi-Cal. Services include assignment to a primary care physician and access to all services available through Medi-Cal in the county of San Francisco.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ED visits
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Difference in the number of ED visits comparing intervention and usual care groups
9-18 months
Hospital admissions
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Difference in the number of hospital admissions comparing intervention and usual care groups
9-18 months
Hospital bed days
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Difference in the number of hospital bed days comparing intervention and usual care groups
9-18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary care visits
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Difference in the number of primary care visits comparing intervention and usual care groups
9-18 months
Cost of health care services
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Difference in costs associated with ED visits, hospital admissions, and primary care visits comparing intervention and usual care groups, using standard Medi-Cal reimbursement rates
9-18 months
Net program costs
Time Frame: 9-18 months
Comparative cost analysis that examines differences in Medi-Cal reimbursements in comparison to SFHP program costs (e.g. staffing, overhead). we plan to track not only the health service use costs outlined above (by assigning standard Medi-Cal reimbursement rates to each service), but also costs related to the CareSupport program such as staffing costs, supplies, and transportation via a comprehensive economic analysis.
9-18 months
Mental health
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled
Depression will be evaluated for the intervention group only, and will include depression based on the PHQ-2. Changes in scores will be assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up as a standard part of the CareSupport assessment and follow-up process conducted by the CareSupport Community Coordinators.
Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled
Satisfaction will be evaluated for the intervention group only, and will include depression based on the PHQ-9. Changes in scores will be assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up as a standard part of the CareSupport assessment and follow-up process conducted by the CareSupport Community Coordinators.
Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled
Self-reported health
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled
Self reported health will be evaluated for the intervention group only and will include a question from the SF-8.
Baseline, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow up if still enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Case Management

Clinical Trials on Care Support Intervention

Subscribe