Southwest Health Extension Partnership to Enhance Research Dissemination

January 22, 2021 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
Heart disease and strokes cause one in three deaths reported each year in the United States. Primary care practices need to implement new research findings that help decrease patients' risk for heart disease and stroke. This project will help to build primary care practice capacity for quality improvement and change management in small and medium size primary care practices in Colorado and New Mexico. This project will also help practices implement patient-centered outcomes research findings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes one in three deaths reported each year in the United States. Strategies derived from patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) that address CVD risk factors can greatly reduce the burden of CVD. Primary care practices must transform to deliver a higher level of PCOR evidence-based prevention to decrease cardiovascular risk. PCOR interventions that emphasize patient-centered care including self-management support, team-based care, improved information systems, and active quality improvement have been shown to be effective. Practices often require assistance integrating new programs into clinical operations. Practice facilitation has been shown to enhance implementation of new programs for patients with chronic disease in primary care. Other methods of practice support, including academic detailing, collaborative learning sessions, and health information technology assistance, have also been shown to be effective, by themselves and in combination with practice facilitation. Patient involvement may also aid practice transformation. Increasingly, practices are actively including patients as part of the change process through the creation of patient advisory councils and including patients in practice quality improvement teams. Another method of patient involvement to inform implementation of evidence-based care is the Boot Camp Translation process, in which patients collaborate with primary care clinicians, staff members, and community members to translate best practices into culturally and community relevant implementation at the local level. However, while these efforts have had considerable success, no study has looked at the incremental value of adding patient engagement strategies to the more standard approaches to practice transformation listed above. This project would implement the Southwest Health Extension Program to Enhance Research Dissemination (SHEPERD) as a cooperative program to build primary care practice capacity for quality improvement, change management, and implementation of PCOR findings in small and medium size primary care practices in Colorado and New Mexico, with an initial focus on cardiovascular care. It also would conduct a cluster randomized trial with an external matched cohort control group to examine the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of two approaches to practice transformation to implement PCOR interventions for reducing cardiovascular risks in primary care practices, comparing the impact of 1) a standard practice transformation support intervention (including practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, HIT assistance, academic detailing, and collaborative learning sessions) to 2) an approach that adds patient engagement activities (including patient advisory councils and boot camp translation) as part of the practice transformation support. This project will provide critical information regarding the added value of patient engagement in practice transformation efforts and will also result in a network of practices across the region with increased capacity for practice transformation and implementation of PCOR findings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5508

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
        • University of Colorado, Denver

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be staff or clinicians (including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) in an enrolled primary care practice
  • Primary care practices must be family medicine or general internal medicine practices with a maximum of ten lead clinicians
  • Primary care practices must be either independent or, if part of a larger organization, demonstrate on careful screening that they do not receive significant quality improvement support from the larger organization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care practices with more than 10 lead clinicians
  • Non-independent primary care practices that receive significant quality improvement support from their system or organization
  • Clinicians and staff who do not speak or read English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard practice transformation support
Primary care practices will receive a cardiovascular care toolkit, practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, academic detailing, and periodic collaborative learning sessions
Experimental: Enhanced practice transformation support
Primary care practices will receive practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, academic detailing, and periodic collaborative learning sessions PLUS patient advisory council support and a modified cardiovascular care toolkit based on combined practice and patient input regarding the local context.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of documentation of aspirin therapy in patients with ischemic vascular disease.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 18 years and older with Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD) with documented use of aspirin or other antithrombotic. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
Change of documentation of blood pressure in patients with a diagnosis of hypertension.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 18 - 85 who had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) and whose blood pressure (BP) was adequately controlled (<140/90) during the measurement year. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
Change of documentation of blood pressure in patients with adequately controlled blood pressure.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 18 - 85 who had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) and whose blood pressure (BP) was adequately controlled (age 18-59 and/or people with diabetes or chronic kidney disease <140/90; age 60-85 <150/90) during the measurement year. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
Change of documentation of fasting LDL in patients with a fasting LDL at or below the LDL goal.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 20 - 79 who had a fasting LDL test performed and whose risk-stratified fasting LDL is at or below the recommended LDL goal. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
Change of documentation of patients who had a fasting LDL test performed and prescribed a statin based on risk.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 20 - 79 who had a fasting LDL test performed and who are prescribed a recommended dose of statin based on risk status if indicated. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
Change of documentation of patients screened about tobacco use.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline
The percent of patients aged 18 years or older screened about tobacco use one or more times within 24 months AND who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user. This is a practice-level indicator of documentation of care processes for cardiovascular disease.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the documentation in primary care practice's.
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 and 15 months from baseline
This primary care practice capacity to implement PCOR findings and improve quality and implementation of the planned comprehensive approach. The measure is based on practice-level scores of change process capacity, adaptive reserve, clinician experience and implementation of patient-centered medical home components.
Baseline, 9 and 15 months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: W. Perry Dickinson, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-0403

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Standard practice transformation support

Subscribe