Low InTensity Exercise Intervention in PAD (LITE)

October 18, 2021 updated by: Mary McDermott, Northwestern University
This proposed study will determine whether a home-based exercise intervention that avoids continuous supervision and exercise-related ischemic pain improves walking performance at 52-week follow-up in people with PAD, compared to an attention control group and compared to a high intensity exercise intervention. In our secondary aims, we will determine whether high intensity exercise improves six-minute walk distance as compared to the attention control group. In secondary aims, we will also determine whether low intensity exercise and high intensity home-based exercise, respectively, improve patient reported outcomes, physical activity, and treadmill walking performance compared to attention control. Our intervention directly addresses two aspects of current practice guidelines that are major barriers to exercise for patients with PAD: 1) the recommendation for supervised exercise and 2) the recommendation for high intensity ischemic-pain inducing walking exercise.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

We will randomize 305 PAD participants to one of three parallel arms: Group 1: Low-intensity, self-paced walking exercise; Group 2: Standard high intensity, ischemic pain-inducing walking exercise; Group 3: Non-exercising attention control group. The low and high intensity exercise groups will attend center-based exercise sessions once per week for four weeks followed by transition to an entirely home-based exercise program for an additional 48 weeks (52 weeks total). Coaches will contact participants weekly by telephone after the first four weeks of the intervention. The low and high intensity exercise interventions will use identical self-regulatory and support strategies. However, the low intensity exercise group will be instructed to exercise with minimal to no ischemic leg discomfort and the high intensity group will be instructed to exercise to maximal ischemic leg pain. These two distinct exercise prescriptions will be reinforced during 48 weeks of home-based exercise, using a well-validated behavioral coaching model that can be delivered by telephone once weekly. Our primary outcome is change in six-minute walk distance at 52-week follow-up. If our hypotheses are correct, millions of people with PAD will benefit from this alternative exercise regimen which will be accessible to most of the 8 million people in the U.S. who suffer from PAD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

305

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Baptist, Tulane University
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All participants will have PAD. PAD will be defined as follows. First, an ABI < or = 0.90 at the baseline study visit is a well-accepted standard for the diagnosis of PAD and will be an inclusion criterion. Second, people with an ABI of >0.90 and < or = 1.00 who experience a 20% ankle systolic pressure drop after the heel-rise test will also be included. Third, potential participants with an ABI > 0.90 who have vascular lab evidence of PAD or angiographic evidence of PAD who have ischemic symptoms during the six-minute walk and/or treadmill exercise stress test will be eligible. In addition to meeting a criterion for PAD, all participants must be symptomatic, defined by one of the following criteria:; a) ischemic leg symptoms (primarily assessed with the San Diego Claudication Questionnaire); b) report ischemic leg symptoms at the end of the six-minute walk; c) report ischemic leg symptoms at the end of the baseline treadmill stress test; d) walking impairment questionnaire results, e) interview with the potential participant about the presence and nature of leg symptoms during walking activity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Above or below knee amputation, critical limb ischemia, wheelchair confinement, or foot ulcer.
  2. Individuals whose walking is limited by a condition other than PAD.
  3. > Class II NYHA heart failure or angina. Increase in angina, angina at rest, or abnormal baseline treadmill stress test.
  4. Major surgery including lower extremity revascularization or orthopedic surgery during the prior three months or anticipated in the next twelve months.
  5. Major medical illness including renal disease requiring dialysis, lung disease requiring oxygen other than at night, or cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) requiring treatment in the prior three years. Potential participants may still qualify if they have had treatment for early stage cancer in the previous three years and the prognosis is excellent.
  6. Mini-mental status examination score <23, dementia, or psychiatric illness including severe depression or anxiety. Investigator discretion may be used to allow some people with an MMSE below 23 to participate if the investigator determines there is another reason for their lower score, including lack of sufficient familiarity with the English language or lack of sufficient education to achieve a score of 23 or higher.
  7. Currently walking regularly for exercise at a level comparable to the amount of exercise prescribed in the intervention.
  8. Current or recent (within 3 months) participation in another clinical trial or cardiac rehabilitation. For a clinical trial of a stem cell or gene therapy intervention, potential participants will be potentially eligible immediately after the final study visit for the clinical trial, so long as long as at least six months has passed since the participant received their final treatment in the stem cell or gene therapy intervention. For a clinical trial involving open-label therapy in which the treatment is not related to functional performance and will not change during the LITE Trial, participants may still qualify for the LITE Trial based on investigator discretion.
  9. Individuals with PAD who have a history of lower extremity revascularization and have a normal ABI.
  10. Individuals who are not able to walk for exercise at a sufficiently slow pace to avoid ischemic leg symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Low-intensity, self-paced walking exercise. Home based exercise.
Participants in one of the exercise intervention groups will attend once weekly sessions at the medical center for the first four weeks of the study (Weeks 1-4, Phase I). During weeks 5-52 (Phase II), they will receive weekly telephone calls from a study coach.
Experimental: Group 2
Standard high intensity, ischemic pain-inducing walking exercise. Home based exercise.
Participants in one of the exercise intervention groups will attend once weekly sessions at the medical center for the first four weeks of the study (Weeks 1-4, Phase I). During weeks 5-52 (Phase II), they will receive weekly telephone calls from a study coach.
Active Comparator: Group 3
Non-exercising attention control group. Contact with staff at same frequency as exercise groups, but staff deliver information on health not related to exercise.
Our attention control group controls for the possibility that regular contact with the study team may improve outcomes in participants randomized to the intervention. Participants randomized to the control group will attend weekly one-hour educational sessions at Northwestern University for the first four weeks of the intervention (Phase I). These sessions are on topics of interest to the typical PAD patient and are led by physicians and other health care workers. Topics include Medicare Part D, nutritional supplements, and cancer screening. During Phase II (weeks 5-52), the attention control group will receive weekly telephone calls, lasting 5-15 minutes, with information on a health-related topic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 52
In the six-minute walk, participants walk back and forth along a 100-ft hallway for six minutes after standardized instructions to complete as many laps as possible. Distance covered in six minutes is recorded.
change from baseline to week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 26
In the six-minute walk, participants walk back and forth along a 100-ft hallway for six minutes after standardized instructions to complete as many laps as possible. Distance covered in six minutes is recorded.
change from baseline to week 26
Maximal Treadmill Walking Time
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 52
In the treadmill walking test, participants walk on either a gardner or modified gardner protocol until they stop the test. Time walked is recorded
change from baseline to week 52
Physical Activity Levels
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 52
ActiGraph measured physical activity
Change from baseline to week 52
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) Distance and Speed Score.
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 52
The WIQ is a well validated questionnaire that measures patient-reported walking limitations in distance and speed.
change from baseline to week 52
Health-related Quality of Life Measure
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 52
The SF-36 physical functioning score will be used to measure quality of life.
change from baseline to week 52
Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: from baseline to week 52
Adherence is defined as the proportion achieving at least 80% of the prescribed exercise frequency and duration during the final month of the intervention.
from baseline to week 52
Change in Muscle Biopsy Measures of Mitochondrial Oxidative Metabolism and Oxidative Stress.
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 52
Muscle tissue will be collected at baseline and follow up to measures Change in muscle biopsy measures of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and oxidative stress.
change from baseline to week 52

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative Assessment
Time Frame: At 52 week follow up
We will use qualitative methods to explore participants' perceptions of the exercise interventions in the high and low-intensity exercise groups, respectively.
At 52 week follow up
Physical Activity Levels Over Seven Days
Time Frame: 26 week follow-up.
ActiGraph
26 week follow-up.
WIQ Distance and Speed Score
Time Frame: 26 week follow-up
The WIQ is a well validated questionnaire that measures patient-reported walking limitations in distance and speed.
26 week follow-up
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 26 weeks
SF-36 physical functioning score.
26 weeks
Adherence to Assigned Intervention
Time Frame: 26 weeks.
Adherence is defined as the proportion achieving at least 80% of the prescribed exercise frequency and duration during the final month of the intervention.
26 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary McDermott, MD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe