- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02554877
A 12-week Study To Evaluate PF-06291874 Once a Day in Adults With T2DM Inadequately Controlled On Metformin
July 5, 2017 updated by: Pfizer
A 12-week, Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Once Daily Pf-06291874 Administration In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin
The purpose of this study is to determine whether PF-06291874 is effective in the treatment T2DM
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This will be a randomized, double blind, stratified, placebo controlled, parallel group study conducted in T2DM subjects receiving background metformin therapy.
Subjects will complete screening procedures to determine eligibility, followed by an 8 week metformin stabilization period prior to randomization.
In addition, subjects taking other OADs, in combination with metformin, will undergo a washout during this period, in which non metformin OAD medications will be temporarily discontinued for the duration of the trial.
Following confirmation of study eligibility criteria at randomization, subjects will be stratified into 2 groups based on the use of concomitant statin therapy.
Each stratum will be randomized across treatment groups, such that the number of subjects taking concomitant statin therapy and those not taking statin therapy will be approximately balanced across treatment groups.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
206
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6T 0G1
- Aggarwal and Associates Limited
-
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada, L4J 8L7
- LMC Clinical Research Inc. (Thornhill)
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4G 3E8
- LMC Clinical Research Inc. (Bayview)
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M9W 4L6
- Manna Research
-
-
Quebec
-
Lévis, Quebec, Canada, G6W 0M6
- Manna Research Inc.
-
Mirabel, Quebec, Canada, J7J 2K8
- Omnispec Clinical Research, Inc.
-
-
-
-
California
-
Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
- Anaheim Clinical Trials, LLC
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90057
- National Research Institute
-
Orange, California, United States, 92868
- NRC Research Institute
-
Roseville, California, United States, 95661
- Sierra Clinical Research
-
Spring Valley, California, United States, 91978
- Encompass Clinical Research
-
Upland, California, United States, 91786
- Empire Clinical Research
-
Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
- Diablo Clinical Research, Inc
-
-
Florida
-
Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
- Clinical Research of South Florida
-
DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
- Avail Clinical Research, LLC
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33135
- Suncoast Research Group, LLC
-
South Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
- QPS-MRA, LLC (Miami research Associates)
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
- Palm Beach Research Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States, 30328
- WR-Mount Vernon Clinical Research, LLC
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96814
- East-West Medical Research Institute
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Midwest Institute for Clinical Research
-
-
Louisiana
-
Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
- Crescent City Clinical Research Center, LLC
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
- St. Louis Clinical Trials, LC
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89120
- ALAS Science Clinical Research
-
-
New Jersey
-
Berlin, New Jersey, United States, 08009
- Comprehensive Clinical Research
-
Eatontown, New Jersey, United States, 07724
- Clinilabs Inc.
-
Marlton, New Jersey, United States, 08053
- Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Inc.
-
Trenton, New Jersey, United States, 08611
- TLB Research
-
-
North Carolina
-
Asheboro, North Carolina, United States, 27203
- Randolph Medical Associates
-
High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27265
- High Point Clinical Trials Center, LLC
-
-
North Dakota
-
Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58103
- Lillestol Research, LLC
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43213
- Aventiv Research
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77081
- Texas Center for Drug Development, Inc.
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
- Juno Research, LLC
-
Katy, Texas, United States, 77450
- Juno Research, LLC
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.
-
Schertz, Texas, United States, 78154
- Northeast Clinical Research of San Antonio, LLC
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23294
- National Clinical Research - Richmond, Inc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or non-childbearing potential females between the ages of 18 (or the minimum country specific age of consent if >18) and 70 years, inclusive, at the screening visit (V1) with the diagnosis of T2DM;Female subjects who are not of childbearing potential
- Subjects who have been on a stable dose of metformin either alone or in combination with one additional acceptable OAD
- HbA1c at the Screen Visit (V1), as assessed by study specific central laboratory, is 7-11% if on metformin monotherapy; is 6.5-9.5% if on dual combination therapy (metformin plus 1)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary forms of diabetes;
- Fasting plasma glucose levels >270 mg/dL (15.0 mmol/L) at the screening and run in visit, (as assessed by study specific central laboratory) confirmed by a single repeat, if deemed necessary
- History of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arterial revascularization, stroke, New York Heart Association Functional Class III IV heart failure, or transient ischemic attack within 6 months of screening;
- Any medical condition possibly affecting study drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy or any area of intestinal resection, active inflammatory bowel disease or pancreatic insufficiency
- Subjects with a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min as determined by the Cockcroft Gault equation (listed below) using serum creatinine measured at screening, confirmed via a single repeat, if deemed necessary
- Subject with a positive result for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibodies (HBc Ab) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies
- Screening seated systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >105 mm Hg after at least a 5 minute rest. Blood pressure determined as the mean of triplicate measurements collected with approximately 2 minutes of rest between measurements
- Screening supine 12 lead ECG demonstrating a corrected QT (QTc) >470 msec; or a QRS interval >120 msec. If QTc exceeds 470 msec or QRS exceeds 120 msec, the ECG may be repeated 2 more times with an interval of 2-4 minutes between each measurement and the mean of the 3 values used to determine the subject's eligibility
- Subjects with an arm circumference >52 cm measured at the midpoint of the length of the upper arm;
- History (within the last 6 months) of regular alcohol consumption exceeding 14 drinks per week for men and 7 drinks a week for women. (1 drink = 5 ounces of wine (150 mL) or 12 ounces (360 mL) of beer or 1.5 ounces (45 mL) of hard liquor);
- Treatment with thiazolidinediones (TZDs), or subcutaneously administered anti diabetic agents (eg, insulin, exenatide, liraglutide, pramlintide) within 6 weeks prior to V1;
- Subjects with a known hypersensitivity or intolerance to a glucagon receptor antagonist, or known prior participation in a trial involving PF 06291874;
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
oral tablet
|
|
Experimental: PF-06291874, 30 mg
|
study drug to be given as an oral tablet at 30, 60 or 100 mg
|
|
Experimental: PF-06291874, 60 mg
|
study drug to be given as an oral tablet at 30, 60 or 100 mg
|
|
Experimental: PF-06291874, 100 mg
|
study drug to be given as an oral tablet at 30, 60 or 100 mg
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) at Week 12 as Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
HbA1c was a form of hemoglobin which was measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time.
Baseline was defined as the last pre-dose measurement prior to first double blind dosing for the study.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8
|
HbA1c was a form of hemoglobin which was measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time.
Baseline was defined as the last pre-dose measurement prior to first double blind dosing for the study.
n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2,4,8 and 12
|
Fasting plasma glucose response changed from baseline at Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. Baseline was defined as the average of the measurements obtained during Day 14 visit window and Day 1 pre-dose measurement.
n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2,4,8 and 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% as Well as <6.5% at Week 12.
Time Frame: Week 12
|
HbA1c was a form of hemoglobin which was measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time.
|
Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to 98 days
|
The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was assessed.
Clinical laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry, urinalysis, and some other tests.
|
Baseline up to 98 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline and Absolute Values in 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Meeting Categorical Summarization Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 98
|
ECG criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization (QRS interval): >=140 milliseconds (msec); >=50% increase from baseline; 2), the interval between the start of the P wave and the start of the QRS complex, corresponding to the time between the onset of the atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization (PR interval): >=300 msec; >=25 percent (%) increase when baseline >200 msec; or increase >=50% when baseline less than or equal to (<=)200 msec; 3), time from ECG Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval): absolute value >=450 - <480 msec, >=480-<500 msec, >=500 msec; increase from baseline >=30 - <60, >=60 msec.
|
Baseline up to Day 98
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline and Absolute Values in Vital Signs Meeting Categorical Summarization Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 98
|
Vital signs included seated supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate.
Vital signs criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), BP: systolic (SBP) greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from baseline, systolic less than (<) 90 mm Hg; diastolic BP (DBP) >=20 mm Hg change from baseline, diastolic <50 mm Hg; 2), pulse rate <40 or greater than (>) 120 beats per minute (bpm).
|
Baseline up to Day 98
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Hypoglycemic Adverse Events (HAEs).
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 119
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reasons: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect.
An HAE was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels.
Any events occurring following start of treatment (defined as blinded therapy, including single blind placebo administration on Day 14) or increasing in severity were counted as treatment emergent AE.
|
Baseline up to Day 119
|
|
Percent Changes From Baseline for Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
Fasting low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) percent change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) at Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
|
Percent Changes From Baseline for Triglycerides at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
Triglycerides percent change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) at Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
Triglycerides MMRM was not appropriate as the data were very skewed and not normally distributed, therefore per SAP non-parametric analysis were reported, presenting medians and CIs for medians, instead.
If the data had many outliers even after the log transformation the following non parametric analysis was presented instead of the MMRM.
An outlier was defined as any data point falling outside of 3.5 x standard deviations the median.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
|
Percent Changes From Baseline for Total Cholesterol at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
Total cholesterol percent change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) on Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
|
Percent Changes From Baseline for High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
High density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) percent change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) at Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
|
Percent Changes From Baseline for Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
Non-HDL-C percent change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) on Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
The body weight change from baseline (defined as the mean of Day 14 and Day 1 pre-dose) at Weeks 2,4,8 and 12. n represented the available number of participants for analysis at post-baseline days.
|
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 18, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 7, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 5, 2017
Last Verified
July 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B4801010
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Nutrition | Diabetes Type 2 | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | Diabetes Mellitis | T2DM | Diabetes EducationUnited States
-
ENBIOSIS BIOTECHNOLOGIESAydin Adnan Menderes University; Izmir University of Economics; Buca Seyfi Demirsoy... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion...Active, not recruiting
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes | Type2diabetes
-
University of SalamancaUniversity of Salamanca; Instituto Piaget; Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde...Enrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Aging | Hyperglycemia Due to Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPortugal
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type2Diabetes
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type I | Diabetes Mellitus Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) | Diabetes Type 2 on Insulin | Diabetes, Type IIUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanenteThe Permanente Medical GroupEnrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)United States
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type 2 Diabetes, Insulin RequiringAustria
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States