Evaluation of the Safety & Performance of 2 Intradermal Safety Devices

October 12, 2015 updated by: University of Surrey

A Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of Two Star Intradermal Safety Device (IDSD) Syringes in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Several vaccinations are administered by the intradermal (ID) method where the vaccine is injected between layers of skin. The current technique required to do this can be difficult to learn and perform accurately, is slower to deliver than subcutaneous or intramuscular injections, and there is a risk that the injection will be given to too-deep skin layers or to underlying tissues, which might change the immune response. There is increasing interest in using ID administration for vaccines as it may be possible to achieve the same immune response with a smaller dose of vaccine. This could increase access to vaccines that are expensive or are only available in small quantities and therefore could have global health benefit for vaccine programs for diseases such as yellow fever and polio.

Because of the potential global-health benefits of being able to give ID injections of vaccines easily, quickly and with relatively little training or experience, several novel devices are currently being developed to allow easy ID administration. Star Syringe have developed two novel intradermal safety devices that differ only in the length of the needle used. The current study will assess how the two new devices perform, compared to the traditional Mantoux test, using injections of saline into the upper arm. Twenty volunteers (18-60 years, male and female) will be recruited and attend a screening visit (1), an injection visit (2a) and have a follow up telephone call (2b). At the injection visit they will receive 3 injections in each arm (Mantoux and 2 device injections) and measurements will be performed.

A subset of volunteers will be invited back to attend an additional visit (3a) which will be a repeat of visit 2 but with an ultrasound image taken of each injection site. There will be a follow up telephone call 24 hours later (3b).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Volunteers will be asked to attend Surrey CRC for two visits with a follow up telephone call. A subset of volunteers will be aske to attend an additional visit and follow up call.

Visit 1 - Screening Visit (Day - 28 to -1) Visit 1 will take place up to 28 days prior to the injections being administered (Visit 2). At this visit consent will be taken and the following procedures performed: demography, medical history and concomitant medication, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature), symptoms-directed physical examination including assessment of deltoid area, measurement of height and weight, blood sample taken for haematology and coagulation screen, completion of a medical health questionnaire. Inclusion/exclusion criteria will be assessed and volunteers that continue to be eligible will be invited back to attend Visit 2a.

Visit 2a - Injection (Day 0) At Visit 2a, continuing eligibility will be assessed and both adverse events and concomitant medication will be recorded. Vital signs will be measured and if the volunteer is still eligible then they will be randomised onto the study.

The volunteer will receive a total of 6 injections, 3 in each upper arm. In each arm there will be one Mantoux injection and 2 device injections (the same device or different). In total they will receive 2 Mantoux injections and 2 injections from each device. To maintain the blind of the study the volunteers will be asked to wear a blindfold during the injections. After each injection a number of measurements will be performed including assessing wheal size and wetness at the injection site as well as subjectively assessing pain. In addition the devices will be weighed before and after use.

Following the injections, vital signs will be recorded again and volunteers will be discharged and provided with a diary card to complete over the following 24 hours. They should record side effects and any medications taken, including over the counter medications as well as any skin reactions.

Visit 2b - Mandatory Follow Up telephone call (Day 1) The volunteer will be telephoned by a member of the study team 24 hours after the injection visit and both adverse events and concomitant medication will be recorded. Volunteers will be asked to return their diary cards to the CRC in the mail.

A subset of volunteers will be invited back to attend Visits 3a and 3b.

Visit 3a - Injection (Within days 7 to 28) At Visit 3a, continuing eligibility will be assessed and both adverse events and concomitant medication will be recorded. Vital signs will be measured and if the volunteer is still eligible then they will be randomised onto the study.

The volunteer will receive a total of 6 injections, 3 in each upper arm. In each arm there will be one Mantoux injection and 2 device injections (the same device or different). In total they will receive 2 Mantoux injections and 2 injections from each device. To maintain the blind of the study the volunteers will be asked to wear a blindfold during the injections. After each injection a number of measurements will be performed including assessing wheal size and wetness at the injection site as well as subjectively assessing pain. At this visit, ultrasound echography will be performed for each injection site. In addition the devices will be weighed before and after use.

Following the injections, vital signs will be recorded again and volunteers will be discharged and provided with a diary card to complete over the following 24 hours. They should record side effects and any medications taken, including over the counter medications as well as any skin reactions.

Visit 3b - Follow Up telephone call (24 h after Visit 3a) The volunteer will be telephoned by a member of the study team 24 hours after the injection visit and both adverse events and concomitant medication will be recorded. Volunteers will be asked to return their diary cards to the CRC in the mail.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Surrey
      • Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom, GU2 7XP
        • Surrey Clinical Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy male or female volunteers aged 18 to 60 years inclusive. Attempts will be made to achieve an equal gender ratio through appropriate screening procedures, but a failure to do so will not preclude analysis of the final data set.
  2. The volunteer is, in the opinion of the investigator, healthy on the basis of self-reported medical history, vital signs, a physical examination (including the skin overlying the deltoids of the upper arms), and the results of routine haematology and coagulation laboratory tests, with no active disease process that could interfere with the study endpoints.
  3. Body Mass Index ≥18.5 and <29.5.
  4. The volunteer is able to read and understand the Informed Consent Form (ICF), and understand study procedures.
  5. The volunteer has signed the ICF and is willing to comply with study procedures.
  6. Available for follow-up for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Clinically significant psychiatric, cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological (particularly myasthenia gravis), immunological, or haematological disease or abnormality, as determined by the study physician, which might interfere with consenting or self-recording of safety events.

    2. Presence of large or dark tattoos or other marking or abnormal variation in skin pigmentation in the area of the deltoids that would preclude measurement of six injection site wheals.

    3. Acute, self-reported needle phobia. 4. Regular use of anti-coagulant medication, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical or oral steroids, anti-histamines and opiates for longer than six months.

    5. Pregnant or lactating at any point during the study from screening to final follow up.

    6. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, compromises the volunteers' ability to meet protocol requirements or to complete the study.

    7. Unable to read and speak English to a fluency level adequate for the full comprehension of procedures required in participation and consent.

    8. Dermatological and other conditions likely to cause excessive soreness, bleeding or pain at the site of injection or subsequent scarring; these might include hyperkeratosis and bleeding disorders.

    9. Peripheral neuropathy, which might interfere with pain perception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Injections
  • Two injections of 0.1 ml sterile saline per injection using Star intradermal safety device 1.2mm needle length
  • Two injections of 0.1 ml sterile saline per injection using Star intradermal safety device 1.5mm needle length
  • Two injections of 0.1 ml saline per subject using Mantoux technique by N&S
Star Intradermal Safety Device 1.2mm needle length, Star Intradermal Safety Device 1.5mm needle length, Mantoux technique by N&S

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diameter of wheal following each injection
Time Frame: Within 2 minutes
To obtain data on wheal size for two versions of an investigational intradermal safety device and compare this to the 'gold-standard' of the Mantoux technique with needle and syringe (referred to as Mantoux N&S)
Within 2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of fluid on skin following each injection
Time Frame: Within 1 minute
To obtain data on 'wetness' of injection
Within 1 minute
Weight of syringes pre filling
Time Frame: Within 4 hours
To obtain data on pre- and post-injection weight of injectate in the injection devices.
Within 4 hours
Weight of syringes post filling
Time Frame: Within 2 hours
To obtain data on pre- and post-injection weight of injectate in the injection devices.
Within 2 hours
Weight of syringes post injections
Time Frame: Within 2 hours
To obtain data on pre- and post-injection weight of injectate in the injection devices.
Within 2 hours
Number of adverse events recorded
Time Frame: Within 24 hours
Local and systemic safety events recorded. Local safety events will be skin reactivity (redness, hardness, swelling).
Within 24 hours
Visual Analogue Score for Pain
Time Frame: Within 2 minutes of injections at visit 2a and visit 3a
Intensity of and comparative perceived pain during injection.
Within 2 minutes of injections at visit 2a and visit 3a
Least painful injection
Time Frame: Within 4 minutes
Following 3 injections on one arm the participant will be asked which was the least painful injection.
Within 4 minutes
Most painful injection
Time Frame: Within 4 minutes
Following 3 injections on one arm the participant will be asked which was the most painful injection.
Within 4 minutes
Ease of Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: Within 1 week
Limited qualitative data on ease of use from the research nurses.
Within 1 week

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depth of dermis
Time Frame: Within 10 mins
Ultrasound echography of the wheal depth and diameter for two versions of an investigational intradermal safety device, compared with Mantoux N&S
Within 10 mins
Thickness of dermis
Time Frame: Within 10 mins
Ultrasound echography of the wheal depth and diameter for two versions of an investigational intradermal safety device, compared with Mantoux N&S
Within 10 mins

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRC332

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe