The Effects of Sensory Training On Pain Modulation, Cognition and Time to Fatigue in Healthy Adults

April 23, 2020 updated by: Felipe Fregni, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
The study is a randomized clinical trial that is assessing the effects of sensory training on pain modulation, cognition, and physical endurance (time to fatigue) in healthy participants

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Network Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Able to perform physical activities such as cycling
  • 18-40 years old
  • BMI<27
  • Practice of moderate intensity aerobic physical activity less than 150 minutes per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Subjects with pacemakers, and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
  • History of asthma with active symptomatology in the past year, pulmonary disease or use of inhalers
  • Physical disability, neurological and/or psychological disorder that precludes safe and adequate testing
  • Conditions that may impair the ability to feel pain
  • Mental impairment with limited ability to cooperate
  • Uncorrected medical conditions, such as significant anemia, important electrolyte imbalance, or hyperthyroidism
  • Pregnancy or trying to become pregnant in the next 6 months
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months as self-reported
  • Epilepsy
  • Suffering from severe depression (with a score >30 in the Beck Depression Inventory)
  • History of unexplained fainting spells as self-reported
  • Head injury resulting in more than a momentary loss of consciousness
  • History of neurosurgery as self-reported
  • Use of antiepileptic and/or hypnotic medications like carbamazepine, valproate acid, gabapentin, zolpidem, etc.
  • Use of medication with potential cardiovascular influence
  • Active smoker, or history of smoking in the last 6 months
  • Skin lesion or open wounds around or in area of electrode application
  • Tattoos in upper limb or along the nerve tract

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active eMNS
Subjects with receive active eMNS for 20 minutes.
Each session will consist of right eMNS stimulation that will last 20-minutes. The frequency of stimulation will be random assigned using random frequency interval. The electrodes that will be used will be standard transcutaneous electrodes. The electrodes will be placed on the wrist.
Sham Comparator: sham eMNS
Subjects with receive sham eMNS for 20 minutes.
Each session of sham eMNS will be the same as active, except the device will be turned off. Similar parameters will be used (for 20 minutes and same electrode placement), except no stimulation will be delivered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PPT
Time Frame: Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Pain threshold as measured by Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) between Visits 2 and 3 (active stimulation and sham, order randomized).
Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
DNIC
Time Frame: Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Pain threshold as measured by Descending Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) between Visits 2 and 3
Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
VAS
Time Frame: Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Pain threshold as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between Visits 2 and 3
Between Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG
Time Frame: Visit 2 and Vist 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = stimulation visit, sham or active (about 1 week from visit 2)
Spontaneous oscillatory brain activity as measured by EEG using a wireless Enobio system (Neuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain).
Visit 2 and Vist 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = stimulation visit, sham or active (about 1 week from visit 2)
Attention Task
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Cognitive Performance (for attention) as measured by the Attention Network Task
Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
N Back test
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Cognitive Performance (for working memory) as measured by the
Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Time to fatigue
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Time to fatigue as measured by total cycling time at 80% of peak power.
Visit 2 and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Perception of physical exertion
Time Frame: Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Perception of physical exertion as measured by the 6-20 Borg Scale
Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Heart rate
Time Frame: Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Heart rate as measured by a standard electrocardiogram
Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)
Respiratory rate as measured by a belt transducer
Visit 1, 2, and 3...where Visit 1 = baseline, Visit 2 = stimulation visit, randomly assigned sham or active (about 2 days from baseline), and Visit 3 = other stimulation visit, sham or active - one not received before (about 1 week from visit 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD, MPH, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015P002574

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants

Clinical Trials on Active eMNS

Subscribe