- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02702024
The Effectiveness of Double Incision Technique in Uterus Preserving Surgery for Placenta Percreta
March 2, 2016 updated by: Burak Yücel, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Placenta percreta is a life-threatening condition that patients are under risk of massive bleeding.
It readily necessitates very complicated surgery even leads to mortality.
Cesarean hysterectomy is the procedure that is acknowledged worldwide, however, recent studies discussing conservative treatment with segmental resections were published.
Fetal extraction and segmental resection could be performed from same (single uterine incision) or two different (double uterine incision) incisions.
In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the results of double uterine incision.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 45 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Intraoperatively and pathologically confirmed diagnosis of placenta percreta
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The success of segmental resection (Uterus preserving surgery)
Time Frame: Postoperative one month
|
No need for hysterectomy due to massive hemorrhage or any other reason in postoperative one month
|
Postoperative one month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
March 8, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 8, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2016
Last Verified
March 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DIforPP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.