The Effectiveness of Double Incision Technique in Uterus Preserving Surgery for Placenta Percreta

March 2, 2016 updated by: Burak Yücel, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Placenta percreta is a life-threatening condition that patients are under risk of massive bleeding. It readily necessitates very complicated surgery even leads to mortality. Cesarean hysterectomy is the procedure that is acknowledged worldwide, however, recent studies discussing conservative treatment with segmental resections were published. Fetal extraction and segmental resection could be performed from same (single uterine incision) or two different (double uterine incision) incisions. In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the results of double uterine incision.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intraoperatively and pathologically confirmed diagnosis of placenta percreta

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The success of segmental resection (Uterus preserving surgery)
Time Frame: Postoperative one month
No need for hysterectomy due to massive hemorrhage or any other reason in postoperative one month
Postoperative one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe