Integrated Primary Care for Chronic Lung Disease: PACK Brazil (PACKBrazilR)

April 26, 2018 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Integrated Primary Care for Chronic Lung Diseases in Less Developed Countries: Pragmatic Trial of the Practical Approach to Care Kit in Brazil (PACK Brazil)

This study will evaluate a complex intervention based on a patient management tool (PMT), combined with educational outreach to primary care doctors, nurses and other health workers, in the Brazilian city of Florianopolis. The intervention is aimed at improving the quality of respiratory care and respiratory health outcomes, and comorbid conditions, in adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The effectiveness of the intervention will be assessed by randomly allocating 48 primary care clinics to receive the intervention or not, and comparing patient and clinic level endpoints that reflect the health and quality of care provided over the following year. About 1250 patients known to have been diagnosed with asthma and 700 with COPD in participating clinics and will be included in the study. The primary endpoints for patients with asthma and COPD, respectively, will be composite scores indicating appropriate prescribing and diagnostic testing. The third primary endpoint, among all adult clinic users, will be rates of new diagnoses of asthma and COPD in each clinic. Secondary endpoints will include the individual components of the composite scores, health measures (hospital admissions and deaths), and indicators of appropriate management of comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular risk factors. Eligible patients will be identified and outcomes measured using electronic medical records.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Long-lasting lung diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) - collectively called chronic respiratory disease (CRD) - place a heavy and growing burden on people living in low and middle income countries. Many of them could be healthier if their disease was accurately diagnosed and correctly treated, but many are not. Doctors and nurses working in primary health care clinic are best placed people to diagnose and treat CRD, especially where local clinics are near and free. But this raises three questions: 1. How to ensure that CRDs get the priority they need in overloaded clinics? 2. How to train clinicians to diagnose and manage CRDs without special test equipment? 3. How to ensure rational evidence-based diagnosis and prescribing for CRD?

The investigators have developed a way of improving primary health care for people who have CRD, who often also have other long term health conditions. It is a patient management tool (PMT), that is, a printed manual of flowcharts taking doctors and nurses from symptoms to diagnoses to treatments, tests or referrals, with advice on how to make decisions along the way about diagnoses, tests, treatments and referrals. They are prompted to think of other diseases and health problems that might be undetected or neglected. The package also includes a method of training known as outreach education. First trainers are trained, then trainers train groups of doctors and nurses at their workplaces, showing them how to use the guidelines, and using their own patients and clinical problems as examples. This outreach training is repeated several times in short sessions. The investigators' research in Africa has shown that this approach can be effective, cost effective, feasible and sustainable. It has been rolled out throughout South Africa and other African countries. But it has have not yet been shown to be effective for this combination of diseases (CRDs together with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, tuberculosis and back pain). The investigators have also not tried or evaluate it in Latin American countries, which have different health systems, and have many more doctors providing primary health care. Now co-investigators in the Brazilian city of Florianopolis have decided to put this educational package in place throughout the city, and have agreed to do so as a randomised controlled trial. This will clearly show whether PACK Brazil is effective, cost effective and feasible under Brazilian conditions.

The core of the research will be the randomised controlled trial. 48 primary care clinics in the city will be randomly chosen either 1) to get the whole package of patient management tool plus training, or 2) only to get the patient management tool (which we expect will make little difference without training). The investigators will compare patients in these two groups of clinics to see the effects of the training. They will use the clinics' electronic medical records to identify about 2000 adults diagnosed with asthma or COPD. After the training starts they will follow these patients up for a year, and assess whether they are being appropriately treated and tested. They will also compare the rates of new diagnoses of asthma and COPD in each clinic, and various health indicators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1950

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Santa Catarina
      • Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 88.040-400

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of chronic lower respiratory diseases (ICD10: J40-J47) recorded in electronic medical records since January 1st 2010

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Doctors and nurses in each clinic will receive printed copies of the patient management tool (PMT) and outreach education training. First trainers will be trained, then trainers will train groups of doctors and nurses at their workplaces, showing them how to use the guidelines, and using their own patients and clinical problems as examples. This outreach training is repeated several times in short sessions.
Printed copies of the patient management tool (PMT) and outreach education training
Active Comparator: Control
Doctors and nurses in each clinic will receive printed copies of the patient management tool (PMT) but will not receive outreach education training.
Printed copies of the patient management tool (PMT) without outreach education training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma composite score
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
For participants with asthma the composite score will comprise points awarded for: i) a first prescription of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or ICS+ long-acting bronchodilator (LABA) combination, or a change in prescription, stepping up from short acting bronchodilator (SABA) to ICS or from ICS to long acting bronchodilator(LABA)+ICS combination; or stepping down from LABA+ICS to ICS, or from ICS to SABA (scoring one point if at least one of these occurs); and ii) request for spirometry (one point). The composite score will be the sum of these points, and will thus range from 0-2. The composite scores for each patient for all visits during the year will be averaged.
During first year of follow-up
COPD composite score
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
For participants with COPD the composite score with comprise points awarded for: i) a first prescription of SABA, ICS, or ICS+LABA; or a change in prescription, stepping up from SABA to LABA or LABA to ICS+LABA, or stepping down from LABA+ICS to LABA, or from LABA to SABA (scoring one point if at least one of these occurs) and ii) request for spirometry (one point). The composite score will be the sum of these, and will thus also range from 0-2.
During first year of follow-up
Asthma-or-COPD diagnosis rate
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Among all participants aged 18 years and over attending each clinic, the number of patients in whom either asthma or COPD is diagnosed for the first time
During first year of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital admission rate for asthma
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Hospital admission rate for asthma in each clinic
During first year of follow-up
Hospital admission rate for COPD
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Hospital admission rate for COPD in each clinic
During first year of follow-up
Cardiovascular disease diagnoses
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of patients with asthma or COPD in whom cardiovascular disease (ICD10 code I00-I99) is diagnosed for the first time
During first year of follow-up
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of patients with asthma or COPD in whom diabetes mellitus (ICD10 code E10-E14) is diagnosed for the first time
During first year of follow-up
Smoking cessation prescriptions
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of participants in whom nicotine replacement therapy, nortryptiline, or bupropion are prescribed
During first year of follow-up
CVD risk assessment
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of participants in whom blood pressure is recorded, or for whom cholesterol, glucose, or electrocardiogram tests are recorded
During first year of follow-up
Depression diagnosis
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of participants in whom depression (ICD10 code F32-F34) is diagnosed for the first time
During first year of follow-up
Depression treatment
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of participants in whom medication for depression (tricyclic and related antidepressants, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors) is prescribed for the first time
During first year of follow-up
Death
Time Frame: During first year of follow-up
Number of participants who died
During first year of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Max Bachmann, MBChB PhD, University of East Anglia
  • Principal Investigator: Eric Bateman, MBChB MD, University of Cape Town
  • Principal Investigator: Rafael Stelmach, MD PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PACKBrazil1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe