- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03732573
Can Brief Text Messages Promote Cycling?
Can Brief Text Messages Based on Control Theory Promote the Use of Bike Share Schemes?
Study Overview
Detailed Description
BCTs have been used to promote many different behaviours including physical activity. Reviews show that the most effective techniques for promoting physical activity are self-monitoring, intention formation, feedback on performance, and goal setting. These techniques are also the core tenets of control theory, which suggests that setting, monitoring, and operating on goals are central to self-control.
To date, most of the intervention studies targeting psychological predictors of behaviour have used one-to-one communication by professionals, counselling, incentives etc. However, such methods may be difficult and costly to implement on a large scale. The proposed research therefore tests whether delivering these techniques via a convenient method (i.e. SMS text messages) is effective in promoting use of bike share schemes. We will also test whether the strength of participants' intentions to use bike share schemes moderates the effects of the intervention.
Participants will be randomly allocated into one of two groups (one experimental and control group). Participants in the control group will receive no messages. Participants in the intervention group will receive text messages prompting goal-setting (e.g. "How many times can you use a shared bike scheme over the next week? Set yourself a goal and challenge yourself!"), goal operating (e.g. "Make plans about when you could use a shared bike scheme, such as at a particular time or for a particular journey next week."), and self-monitoring (e.g. "Studies show that keeping track of progress can help people to achieve their goals. This is what the apps provided by the shared bike schemes can do for you!"). The messages will comprise of 160 characters at most and participants in the intervention group will receive three messages per week.
One month after taking the baseline survey, participants will be asked to fill in a follow-up survey which will ask them how many times they have used bike share schemes in total during the past month. This information is provided in the apps in "My Trips" section and participants will be asked to count the number of individual trips that they have taken since they completed the baseline survey. It is hypothesized that participants in the intervention group will use bike share schemes more frequently than those in the control group and that the intervention effect will be moderated by the strength of participants' initial intentions.
Mixed-measures (condition x time) ANOVA will be used to test for differences in shared bike use between the groups between baseline and follow-up. A moderation analysis will also be conducted to test whether the effect of the text messages on bike scheme use differs by intention strength.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults who live in a city with a bike share
- Owns a smart phone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who cannot ride a bicycle
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
This group will receive 9 text messages over 3 weeks.
Messages will be based on goal-setting in the first week, goal-operating in the second week, and self-monitoring in the third week.
|
Text messages conveying 3 specific behaviour change techniques
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in this group will receive no messages during the intervention period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in total number of times bike share schemes used before and after the intervention
Time Frame: One month
|
Participants will be asked to count number of times they used bike share schemes, which are recorded by phone apps automatically.
This will be asked at baseline and follow up questionnaires one month apart.
|
One month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of bike schemes in the past seven days
Time Frame: One week
|
Participants will be asked to count number of times they used bike share schemes over the last week (will be asked in the follow up questionnaire which will be send 1 month after the baseline questionnaire).
As our intervention takes three weeks and our follow up will be at the end of the month, we wanted to specify use of bike share schemes in the last week without any messages sent.
|
One week
|
|
Change in total number of times participants used their own bike in the past month
Time Frame: One month
|
Participants will be asked how many times they used their own bikes in the past month.
We want to measure how our intervention affects use of personal bikes.
This will be compared with baseline scores for those who reports owning a bicycle.
|
One month
|
|
Use of one's own bike in the past seven days
Time Frame: One week
|
Participants will be asked how many times they used their personal bicycles in the past seven days.
Similar to use of bike share schemes in the past week, we also want to control for personal bike use in the past week (after all our messages will be sent).
|
One week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
- Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701. doi: 10.1037/a0016136.
- Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982 Jul;92(1):111-35. No abstract available.
- Bird EL, Baker G, Mutrie N, Ogilvie D, Sahlqvist S, Powell J. Behavior change techniques used to promote walking and cycling: a systematic review. Health Psychol. 2013 Aug;32(8):829-38. doi: 10.1037/a0032078. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
- Rose T, Barker M, Maria Jacob C, Morrison L, Lawrence W, Strommer S, Vogel C, Woods-Townsend K, Farrell D, Inskip H, Baird J. A Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Improving the Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors of Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- University of Sheffield
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sedentary Lifestyle
-
Eindhoven University of TechnologyCompletedLifestyle | Lifestyle, Healthy | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Lifestyle, SedentaryBelgium
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, San DiegoCompleted
-
Loughborough UniversityBritish Heart FoundationCompletedSedentary Lifestyle | Sedentary Behavior | Diet Habit
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalRecruitingLifestyle, SedentaryTaiwan
-
Brandeis UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
University of MiamiCompletedSedentary LifestyleUnited States
-
University of PrimorskaInnorenew CoEUnknown
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompletedVirtual Trainer System (3rd Version) for Physical Activity Promotion in Middle-aged Hong Kong AdultsSedentary LifestyleHong Kong
-
VakgroepBewegingsEnSportwetenschappenUniversity GhentCompleted
Clinical Trials on Text messages
-
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergPhilipps University Marburg Medical CenterCompleted
-
Duquesne UniversityUniversity of California, San Diego; West Penn Allegheny Health System; El Centro... and other collaboratorsTerminated
-
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of MinnesotaHealthPartners InstituteUnknownAsthmaUnited States
-
Duke UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedSmoking | PregnancyUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaRoswell Park Cancer InstituteCompleted
-
Auburn UniversityCompleted
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthHealth CanadaCompleted
-
Imperial College LondonBarts & The London NHS Trust; Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust; Royal... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedAtopic DermatitisUnited States